Data set of two dual-task paradigms to measure listening effort in cochlear implant users
Authors/Creators
- 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Description
This data set presents the data from the paper by Hendrikse, Dingemanse, & Goedegebure (2022). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using listening effort to measure relatively small differences in SNR, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. Listening effort was chosen, because there are indications in literature that listening effort may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures. Two behavioral listening effort tests were performed at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) where the intelligibility was high. A sentence final word identification and recall test (SWIRT), and a sentence verification test (SVT) were compared with a group of 18 Dutch CI users. SWIRT measured the ability to recall the final words of sentences after a list of five or seven sentences was presented. The SVT measured the ability and reaction time to determine whether a sentence was true or false. Both tests were conducted in background noise at SNRs +4 dB and +8 dB above the 50% speech perception threshold. The structure of the data files is explained in the README file.
Notes
Files
LECI_SRT50.csv
Files
(448.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0ca6d3cffa52f9049c34ca3b8ef54510
|
989 Bytes | Preview Download |
|
md5:f57a171822665c7265814cb685095f92
|
141.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:2ad7015739d8fca57d8343752aa5c169
|
136.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:a620b57e58a76e38a82b6669ca473219
|
1.8 kB | Download |
|
md5:1082ebcf126b47bafad4a4f39021da18
|
141.6 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:43c47a96b318aa575b66080b3f87294d
|
5.4 kB | Download |
|
md5:178b670e8e305bc2468dbd00e519de10
|
6.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:832d916262e8e9a1209ea1e1e3578003
|
5.0 kB | Download |
|
md5:8210d2656cc0f75870fd94ebc522d0e3
|
9.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.7022067 (DOI)
Funding
References
- Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2009). Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 126(5), 2649-2659. doi:10.1121/1.3216914
- Hendrikse, M. M. E., Dingemanse, G., & Goedegebure, A. (2022). On the Feasibility of Using Behavioral Listening Effort Test Methods to Evaluate Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users. preprint. Erasmus MC. Zenodo.
- Janse, E., & Adank, P. (2012). Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 65(8), 1563-1585. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658822
- Versfeld, N. J., Daalder, L., Festen, J. M., & Houtgast, T. (2000). Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107(3), 1671-1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451