Coffee and Tea? A diachronic corpus-based, collocation and colligation analysis of the words coffee and tea
Description
This paper aims to analyze the absolute and relative frequencies of the words coffee and tea in the COHA corpus and to conduct collocational and colligational analysis using log-likelihood ratio (LLR) (Gries. 2009; Bybee et al. 2001), pointwise mutual information (PMI) (Evert et al. 2016; Church et al. 1990), as well as KWIC (Keyword in Context) methods. The frequency analysis uses a diachronic approach, and collocation and colligation analysis is conducted using a synchronic approach. A sample language dataset of 3.6 million words is collected from the COHA (Corpus of Historical American English) website and analyzed using the Python programming language. The frequency analysis suggests that coffee occurs 46.67% more often than tea and that coffee is gaining more popularity while tea sees the opposite. The collocational and colligational analysis reveals that coffee collocates more diversely than tea in all categories, including verbs, adjectives, and nouns. Moreover, coffee and tea is frequently used in the context of social interaction, as well as in the sense of social gathering (instead of a beverage). They often collocate and are used with other food-and-drink-related words. The dominant constructions identified are possessive noun phrases and direct objects. Lastly, coffee is specifically found to be used in the domain of commercialization.
Files
Coffee and Tea_ A diachronic corpus-based, collocation and colligation analysis of the words coffee and tea.pdf
Files
(845.2 kB)
Additional details
References
- Barnbrook, Geoff, David Mason & Roland Krishnamurthy. 2017. Collocation: applications and implications. Routledge.
- Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery & Susan Wattam. 2015. Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. Routledge.
- Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. English Historical Semantics and the Lexicon. In Tea and Coffee: How New Beverages Acquired English Names, 146-168. Edinburgh University Press.
- Bybee, Joan L. & Paul J. Hopper. 2001. Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins Publishing.
- Church, Kenneth W. & Hanks, Patrick. 1990. Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29.
- Collins English Dictionary. (n.d.). Tea definition. Retrieved March 18, 2023, from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/tea
- de Bolla, Peter, Etienne Jones, Paul Nulty, Giacomo Recchia & James Regan. 2016. The Idea of Liberty, 1600–1800: A Distributional Concept Analysis. Stanford University Press.
- Evert, Stefan & Andrew Hardie. 2010. Twenty-first century Corpus Workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference, 183-193.
- Evert, Stefan & Krennmayr, Tina. 2016. Methods for corpus linguistics. In J. Conzett & S. Mair (Eds.), Methods in Contemporary Linguistics (pp. 1-25). De Gruyter Mouton.
- Firth, John Rupert. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1-32.
- Gries, Stefan Th. 2009. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: further explorations. Language and Computers, 69-80.
- Gries, Stefan Th. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Routledge.
- Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Walter de Gruyter.
- Gabrielatos, Costas. 2007. Keyness Analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. University of Lancaster.
- Manning, Christopher D. & Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press.
- Oktavia, Mutia Dewi. 2019. A Corpus-Based Study of English Loanwords in Indonesian. International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 5(2), 123-136.
- Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- van Eijnatten, Joris & Peter Huijnen. 2021. Something Happened to the Future: Reconstructing Temporalities in Dutch Parliamentary Debate, 1814-2018. Brill.