Legality of US Drone Strikes
Description
The fundamental principles of international law are the apex legal definitions that sit at the very top of the legal theory. Professor Alain Pellet has highlighted the distinction between the fundamental principles of international law and the general principles of international law.1Pellett (2000) states that the general principles are reflected in the municipal laws as various subsets of international law principles such as adherence to the universal human rights as part of the municipal legislation for human rights. The ‘fundamental’ nature is derived from international treaties that are the underline body giving it the credence as the apex body of law. These fundamental principles of international law are, for example, the principle of equality and sovereignty of nations, the principle of the prohibition on the use of force, the principle of the threat to the use of force, the principle of human dignity etc. The United States (US) ha
Files
4146574916.pdf
Files
(314.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:57b092b7aa488eece3cc8a9c53d982b6
|
314.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Becker, John D. ―The Continuing Relevance of Article 2 (4): A Consideration of the Status of the UN Charter's Limitations of the Use of Force.‖ Denv. J. Int'l L. &Pol'y 32 (2003): 583.
- Bowcott, Owen. ―Drone Strikes Threaten 50 Years of International Law, Says UN Rapporteur.‖ The Guardian 21 (2012): 2012.
- ―US Drone Strikes in Pakistan ‗Carried out without Government's Consent.'‖ The Guardian, 2013, sec. World news. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/15/us-drone-strikes-pakistan
- Boyle, Michael J. ―The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare.‖ International Affairs 89, no. 1 (2013): 1–29.
- Brunstetter, Daniel R., and Arturo Jimenez-Bacardi. ―Clashing over Drones: The Legal and Normative Gap between the United States and the Human Rights Community.‖ The International Journal of Human Rights 19, no. 2 (2015): 176–98.
- ] Crawford, James, and Crawford James. The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries. Cambridge University Press, 2002.