Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 1, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Ontogeny of the skeleton of Moenkhausia pittieri (Ostariophysi: Characiformes) with discussion on functional demands and ossification patterns in the Characidae

Authors/Creators

Description

Marinho, Manoela M F (2023): Ontogeny of the skeleton of Moenkhausia pittieri (Ostariophysi: Characiformes) with discussion on functional demands and ossification patterns in the Characidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197 (2): 474-513, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac029, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/197/2/474/6601381

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/7609400">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:3161FFF0786C1B629340F009FFB1FF8B

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609402 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/118E6616786F1B6193D1F0CDFD1EFF51 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609405 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609407 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609409 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609411 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609413 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609415 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609417 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609419 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609421 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609423 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609425 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609427 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609429 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609431 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609433 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609435 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609437 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7609441 (DOI)

References

  • Abrahao VP, Pastana M, Marinho MMF. 2019. On a remarkable sexual dimorphic trait in the Characiformes related to the olfactory organ and description of a new miniature species of Tyttobrycon Gery (Characiformes: Characidae). PLoS One 14: e0226130.
  • Adriaens D, Verraes W. 1998. Ontogeny of the osteocranium in the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus Burchell (1822) (Siluriformes: Clariidae): ossification sequence as a response to functional demands. Journal of Morphology 235: 183-237.
  • Alberch P, Blanco MJ. 1996. Evolutionary patterns in ontogenetic transformation: from laws to regularities. International Journal of Developmental Biology 40: 845-858.
  • Arratia G, Schultze HP. 1990. The urohyal: development and homology within osteichthyans. Journal of Morphology 203: 247-282.
  • Azevedo MA. 2010. Reproductive characteristics of characid fish species (Teleostei, Characiformes) and their relationship with body size and phylogeny. Iheringia, Serie Zoologia 100: 469-482.
  • Bird NC, Mabee PM. 2003. Developmental morphology of the axial skeleton of the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae). Developmental Dynamics 228: 337-357.
  • Block AJ, Mabee PM. 2012. Development of the mandibular, hyoid arch and gill arch skeleton in the Chinese barb Puntius semifasciolatus: comparisons of ossification sequences among Cypriniformes. Journal of Fish Biology 81: 54-80.
  • Britz R, Conway KW. 2009. Osteology of Paedocypris, a miniature and highly developmentally truncated fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae). Journal of Morphology 270: 389-412.
  • Buckup PA. 1998. Relationship of the Characidiinae and phylogeny of characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZMS, Lucena CAS, eds. Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, 123-144.
  • Buhrnheim CM, Carvalho TP, Malabarba LR , Weitzman SH. 2008. A new genus and species of characid fish from the Amazon Basin: the recognition of a relictual lineage of characid fishes (Ostariophysi: Cheirodontinae: Cheirodontini). Neotropical Ichthyology 6: 663-678.
  • Calcagnotto D, Schaefer SA, DeSalle R. 2005. Relationships among characiform fishes inferred from analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 135-153.
  • Camelier P, Dagosta FCP, Marinho MMF. 2018. New remarkable sexually dimorphic miniature species of Hyphessobrycon (Characiformes: Characidae) from the upper Rio Tapajos Basin. Journal of Fish Biology 92: 1149-1162.
  • Carter DR, Van der Meulen MCH, Beaupre GS. 1996. Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. Bone 18: S5-S10.
  • Carvalho M, Bockmann FA, Carvalho MR. 2013. Homology of the fifth epibranchial and accessory elements of the ceratobranchials among Gnathostomes: insights from the development of ostariophysans. PLoS One 8: e62389.
  • Carvalho M, Vari RP. 2015 . Development of the splanchnocranium in Prochilodus argenteus (Teleostei: Characiformes) with a discussion of the developmental patterns in the Otophysi. Zoology 118: 34-50.
  • Clark CT, Smith KK. 1993. Cranial osteogenesis in Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae) and Macropus eugenii (Macropodidae). Journal of Morphology 215: 119-149.
  • Conway KW, Britz R. 2007. Sexual dimorphism of the Weberian apparatus and pectoral girdle of Sundadanio axelrodi (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae), a miniature cyprinid from South East Asia. Journal of Fish Biology 71: 1562-1570.
  • Cubbage CC, Mabee PM. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in the zebrafish Danio rerio (Ostariophysi, Cyprinidae). Journal of Morphology 229: 121-160.
  • Datovo A, Castro RMC. 2012. Anatomy and evolution of the mandibular, hyopalatine, and opercular muscles in characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zoology 115: 84-116.
  • Datovo A, Vari RP. 2014. The adductor mandibulae muscle complex in lower teleostean fishes (Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii): comparative anatomy, synonymy, and phylogenetic implications. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171: 554-622.
  • Ferreira KM, Mirande JM, Quagio-Grassiotto I , Santana JCO, Baicere-Silva CM, Menezes NA. 2021. Testing the phylogenetic hypotheses of Stevardiinae Gill, 1858 in light of new phenotypic data (Teleostei: Characidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 59: 2060-2085.
  • Fink SV, Fink WL. 1981. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 297-353.
  • Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Van der Laan R. 2021. Eschmeyer's catalog of fishes. Available at: http:// researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/ catalog/fishcatmain.asp
  • Galis F, Terlouw A, Osse JWM. 1994. The relation between morphology and behavior during ontogenetic and evolutionary changes. Journal of Fish Biology 45: 13-26.
  • Gery J, Uj A. 1987. The ember tetra: a new pygmy characid tetra from the Rio das Mortes, Brazil, Hyphessobrycon amandae sp. n. (Pisces, Characoidei). Tropical Fish Hobbyist 35: 58-61.
  • Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Green MH, Ho KH, Hale ME. 2011. Movement and function of the pectoral fins of the larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) during slow swimming. The Journal of Experimental Biology 214: 3111-3123.
  • Hall BK. 2015. Bones and cartilage: developmental and evolutionary skeletal biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Academic Press.
  • Hanken J, Hall NK. 1984. Variation and timing of the cranial ossification sequence of the oriental fire-bellied toad, Bombina orientalis (Amphibia: Discoglossidae). Journal of Morphology 182: 245-255.
  • Hanken J, Wake DB. 1993. Miniaturization of body size: organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 24: 501-519.
  • Hoffmann M, Britz R. 2006. Ontogeny and homology of the neural complex of otophysan Ostariophysi. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 301-330.
  • Langeani F, Serra JP. 2010. Coptobrycon bilineatus (Ellis, 1911) (Characiformes: Characidae): redescription and comments on its phylogenetic relationships. Neotropical Ichthyology 8: 727-736.
  • Lauder GV. 1979. Feeding mechanics in primitive teleosts and in the halecomorph fish Amia calva. Journal of Zoology 187: 543-578.
  • Lauder GV, Liem KF. 1980. The feeding mechanism and cephalic myology of Salvelinus fontinalis: form, function, and evolutionary significance. In: Balon EK, ed. Salmonid fishes of the genus Salvelinus. The Hague: W. Junk, 365-390.
  • Lima FCT, Caires RA, Conde-Saldana, Mirande JM, Carvalho FR . 2021 . A new miniature Pristella (Actinopterygii: Characiformes: Characidae) with reversed sexual dimorphism from the Rio Tocantins and Rio Sao Francisco basins, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology 99: 339-348.
  • Lima FCT, Gerhard P. 2001. A new Hyphessobrycon (Characiformes: Characidae) from Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil, with notes on its natural history. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 12: 105-114.
  • Mabee PM, Karen L, Cubbage CC. 2000. An experimental study of intraspecific variation, developmental timing, and heterochrony in fishes. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 56: 2091-2106.
  • Mabee PM, Trendler TA. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Betta splendens (Teleostei: Percomorpha): intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. Journal of Morphology 227: 249-287.
  • Malabarba LR, Weitzman SH. 2003. Description of a new genus with six new species from southern Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina, with a discussion of a putative characid clade (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). Comunicacoes do Museu de Ciencias e Tecnologia da PUCRS 16: 67-151.
  • Marinho MMF, Bastos DA, Menezes NA. 2013. New species of miniature fish from Marajo Island, Para, Brazil, with comments on its relationships (Characiformes: Characidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 11: 739-746.
  • Marinho MMF, Ohara WM, Dagosta FCP. 2021. A new species of Moenkhausia (Characiformes: Characidae) from the Rio Madeira Basin, Brazil, with comments on the evolution and development of the trunk lateral line system in characids. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e200118.
  • Mattox GMT, Britz R, Toledo-Piza M. 2014. Skeletal development and ossification sequence of the characiform Salminus brasiliensis (Ostariophysi: Characidae ). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 25: 103-158.
  • Mattox GMT, Britz R, Toledo-Piza M. 2016. Osteology of Priocharax and remarkable developmental truncation in a miniature Amazonian fish (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). Journal of Morphology 277: 65-85.
  • Mattox GMT, Britz R, Toledo-Piza M, Marinho MMF. 2013. Cyanogaster noctivaga, a remarkable new genus and species of miniature fish from the Rio Negro, Amazon Basin (Ostariophysi, Characidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwater 23: 297-318.
  • Mattox GMT, Souza CS, Toledo-Piza M, Oliveira C. 2021. A new miniature species of Priocharax (Characiformes: Characidae) from the upper Rio Ipixuna, Purus drainage, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e210048.
  • Mattox GMT, Toledo-Piza M. 2012. Phylogenetic study of the Characinae (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165: 809-915.
  • Melo BF , Sidlauskas BL , Near TJ , Roxo FF , Ghezelayagh A, Ochoa LE, Stiassny ML, Arroyave J, Chang J, Faircloth BC, MacGuigan DJ. 2022. Accelerated diversification explains the exceptional species richness of tropical characoid fishes. Systematic Biology 71: 78-92.
  • MenezesNA,WeitzmanSH. 2009. SystematicsoftheNeotropical fish subfamily Glandulocaudinae (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 7: 295-370.
  • Mirande JC. 2010. Phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes), from characters to taxonomy. Neotropical Ichthyology 8: 385-568.
  • Mirande JC. 2018. Morphology, molecules and the phylogeny of Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes). Cladistics 35: 282-300.
  • Moreira CR. 2005. Xenurobrycon coracoralinae, a new glandulocaudine fish (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) from central Brazil. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 118: 855-862.
  • Netto-Ferreira AL, Birindelli JLO, de Sousa LM, Mariguela TC, Oliveira C. 2013. A new miniature characid (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae), with phylogenetic position inferred from morphological and molecular data. PLoS One 8: e52098.
  • Oliveira C, Avelino GS, Abe KT, Mariguela TC, Benine RC, Orti G, Vari RP, Castro RMC. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 275.
  • Orti G, Meyer A. 1997. The radiation of characiform fishes and the limits of resolution of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Biology 46: 75-100.
  • Pastana MNL, Bockmann FA, Datovo A. 2019. The cephalic lateral-line system of Characiformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi): anatomy and phylogenetic implications. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189: 1-46.
  • Pastana MNL, Dagosta FCP, Esguicero AHL. 2017. A new sexually dichromatic miniature Hyphessobrycon (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae) from the Rio Formiga, upper Rio Juruena Basin, Mato Grosso, Brazil, with a review of sexual dichromatism in Characiformes. Journal of Fish Biology 95: 1301-1318.
  • Patterson C, Rosen DE. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158: 81-172.
  • de Pinna MCC, Zuanon J, Py-Daniel LR, Petry P. 2017. A new family of neotropical freshwater fishes from deep fossorial Amazonian habitat, with a reappraisal of morphological characiform phylogeny (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 182: 76-106.
  • Roberts TR. 1967. Tooth function and replacement in characoid fishes. Stanford Ichthyological Bulletin 8: 231-247.
  • Roman-Valencia C, Garcia-Alzate CA, Ruiz-C RI, Taphorn DC. 2012. A new species of Tyttocharax (Characiformes: Characidae: Stevardiinae) from the Guejar River, Orinoco River Basin, Colombia. Neotropical Ichthyology 10: 519-525.
  • Rombough P. 2002. Gills are needed for ionoregulation before they are needed for O2 uptake in developing zebrafish, Danio rerio. The Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 1787-1794.
  • Rosen DE, Greenwood PH. 1970. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. American Museum Novitates 2428: 1-25.
  • Sidlauskas B, Vari RP. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 70-210.
  • Smith KK. 2002. Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development. Journal of Morphology 252: 82-97.
  • Standen EM. 2008. Pelvic fin locomotor function in fishes: three-dimensional kinematics in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The Journal of Experimental Biology 211: 2931-2942.
  • Starks EC. 1926. Bones of the ethmoid region of the fish skull. Stanford: Stanford University Publications.
  • Taylor WR, Van Dyke GC. 1985. Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study. Cybium 9: 107-119.
  • Toledo-Piza M, Mattox GMT, Britz R. 2014. Priocharax nanus, a new miniature characid from the Rio Negro,Amazon Basin (Ostariophysi: Characiformes), with an updated list of miniature Neotropical freshwater fishes. Neotropical Ichthyology 12: 229-246.
  • Trapani J, Yamamoto Y, Stock DW. 2005. Ontogenetic transition from unicuspid to multicuspid oral dentition in a teleost fish: Astyanax mexicanus, the Mexican tetra (Ostariophysi: Characidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 145: 523-538.
  • Vandewalle P, Focant B, Huriaux F, Chardon M. 1992. Early development of the cephalic skeleton of Barbus barbus (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Journal of Fish Biology 41: 43-62.
  • Vandewalle P, Germeau G, Besancenet P, Parmentier E, Baras E. 2005. Early development of the head skeleton in Brycon moorei (Pisces, Ostariophysi, Characidae). Journal of Fish Biology 66: 996-1024.
  • Vari RP. 1979. Anatomy, relationships and classification of the families Citharinidae and Distichodontidae (Pisces, Characoidea). London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).
  • Vari RP. 1995. The neotropical fish family Ctenoluciidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes): supra and intrafamilial phylogenetic relationships, with a revisionary study. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 564: 1-97.
  • Walter BE. 2012. Cranial skeletogenesis and osteology of the redeye tetra Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae. Journal of Fish Biology 82: 69-95.
  • Weitzman SH. 1962. The osteology of Brycon meeki, a generalized characid fish, with an osteological definition of the family. Stanford Ichthyological Bulletin 8: 1-77.
  • Weitzman SH, Fink WL. 1983. Relationships of the neon tetras, a group of South American freshwater fishes (Teleostei, Characidae), with comments on the phylogeny of New World characiforms. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150: 339-395.
  • Weitzman SH, Malabarba LR. 1999. Systematics of Spintherobolus (Teleostei: Characidae: Cheirodontinae) from eastern Brazil. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 10: 1-43.
  • Weitzman SH, Vari RP. 1988. Miniaturization in South American freshwater fishes: an overview and discussion. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 101: 444-465.
  • Zanata AM, Vari RP. 2005. The family Alestidae (Ostariophysi, Characiformes): a phylogenetic analysis of a trans-Atlantic clade. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 145: 1-144.