Development and Psychometric Validation of the Nursing Self-Efficacy Scale for Managing Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiotoxicity: An Exploratory Mixed-Method Study.
Authors/Creators
- 1. Researcher, Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
- 2. Nursing Scholar, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
- 3. Researcher, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
- 4. Researcher, Centre for Excellence in Nursing Scholarship, OPI of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- 5. Researcher, Centre for Excellence in Nursing Scholarship, OPI of Rome, Rome, Italy; Researcher, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
- 6. Researcher, Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: rosario.caruso@grupposandonato.it.
Description
Magon A, Conte G, Arrigoni C, Dellafiore F, de Maria M, Pittella F, Rocco G, Stievano A, Ghizzardi G, Caruso R. Development and Psychometric Validation of the Nursing Self-Efficacy Scale for Managing Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiotoxicity: An Exploratory Mixed-Method Study. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2022 Nov 18:151367. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151367. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36411124.
Abstract
Objective: Assessing nursing self-efficacy could be strategic to sustain nursing competence. This study aimed to develop and validate the nursing self-efficacy scale for managing cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity (NSS-CTC).
Data sources: An exploratory mixed-method study was performed by including two main phases. The first comprised the developmental tasks to generate the initial pool of items, including a literature review and a consensus meeting based on a nominal group technique. The second phase initially involved an external panel of experts in assessing the content validity of the novel scale, followed by a cross-sectional data collection to perform exploratory factor analysis by employing a multicenter and convenience sampling approach. The most plausible psychometric structure derived from the exploratory factor analysis was tested with a confirmatory factor analysis using a second data collection round on another sample enrolled with a multicenter and convenience sampling approach. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alfa.
Conclusion: The NSS-CTS is a novel 15-item self-report measure for assessing nurse self-efficacy in dealing with cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity. Its two plausible domains were labeled knowledge-related self-efficacy (Cronbach's α = 0.924) and practice-related self-efficacy (Cronbach's α = 0.937); the factor analyses in both samples showed adequate fit to sample statistics. Future studies are necessary to corroborate its construct validity and assess its measurement invariance across various country contexts.
Implications for nursing practice: Assessing nursing self-efficacy for managing cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity is a promising approach for identifying educational gaps and promoting nursing competency in this particular area of cancer care.