Published September 29, 2022 | Version Published

IN-SITU SPINALIZATION ROLE PLAYED BY ZnO AND MgO ON Al2O3-BASED CASTABLES

  • 1. Federal University of Sao Carlos, Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering, Brazil
  • 2. RHI Magnesita, Research and Development Center, Praça Louis Ensch, 240, Contagem, MG, Brazil

Description

Due to its suitable mechanical, chemical and thermo-mechanical properties, MgO-containing refractories have been extensively investigated during the last decades, however, the likelihood of applying alternative chemical elements to induce in-situ spinalization in refractory castables remains underexplored. In this regard, zincite (ZnO) seems to be a promising alternative as it can react to alumina at intermediate temperatures (~ 800 ºC), giving rise to the spinel ZnAl2O4 (also known as gahnite), which is nontoxic, has high refractoriness (> 1900 ºC), low coefficient of thermal expansion, and suitable corrosion resistance. In this work, the addition of ZnO (zincite) in alumina-based castables was assessed and compared with its MgO counterparts with the same volumetric amount of spinel-like phase formed. In-situ Young’s modulus (E) measurements, and assisted sinterability (AS) pointed out that gahnite formation takes place at lower temperatures (~ 1100 ºC) than the spinel MgAl2O4 (~ 1300 ºC). On one hand, this lower formation temperature induces anticipated mechanical strengthening, giving rise to the possibility of firing the ZnO-containing compositions at inferior temperatures. On the other, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) highlighted that this faster kinetics of ZnAl2O4 formation leads to remarkable changes in the morphology of the pores generated during the firing process, which is assigned to the Kirkendall effect. In contrast to MgO-containing compositions, the pores created by ZnAl2O4 formation are preferentially located at the interface of the alumina aggregates, inducing their partial detachment, which impacts some key properties of the castable as thermal shock damage resistance and cold modulus of rupture.

Notes

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - finance code 001; and by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – Brazil (FAPESP) – process number 2021/00114-2. Additionally, the authors are thankful for the support of RHI Magnesita and FIRE (Federation for International Refractory Research and Education).

Files

ICR 2022 - Borges et al - v3 - Zenodo.pdf

Files (567.0 kB)

Name Size
md5:aeee261306bc3a7ad75a9a70099fecc6
567.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.08.030 (DOI)