Published October 15, 2022 | Version v1

Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) male defensive behavior against Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Description

Mortezapour, Kiana, Golpayegani, Azadeh Zahedi, Saboori, Alireza, Mohammadi, Helen (2022): Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) male defensive behavior against Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Persian Journal of Acarology 11 (4): 671-680, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v11i4.70423

Files

source.pdf

Files (393.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f1dee17375e3d43c10633d8532566cb5
393.3 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFDEE173FFE3D43C1063FF853256FFB5

References

  • Carvalho, M.J.A. & Mirth, C.K. (2015) Coordinating morphology with behavior during development: an integrative approach from a fly perspective. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 5. DOI: 103389/fevo.2015.00005
  • Choh, Y., Ignacio, M., Sabelis, M.W. & Janssen, A. (2012) Predator prey role reversals, juvenile experience and adult antipredator behavior. Scientific Reports, 2: 728.
  • Choh, Y., Takabayashi, J., Sabelis, M.W. & Janssen, A. (2014) Witnessing predation can affect strength of counterattack in phytoseiids with ontogenetic predator-prey role reversal. Animal Behavior, 93: 9-13.
  • Clouche, G., Yano, A., Akino, T. & Amano, H. (2014) Chemical investigation of aggregation behavior in the two spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 63: 377-387.
  • Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, B, 205: 489-511.
  • Dias, C.R., Bernado, A.M.G., Mencalha, J., Freitas, C.W.C., Sarmento, R.A., Pallini, A. & Janssen, A. (2016) Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 69: 263-276. DOI: 10.1007/ s10493-016-0042-5
  • Dittmann, L. & Schausberger, P. (2017) Adaptive aggregation by spider mites under predation risk. Scientific Reports, 7: 10609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10819-8
  • Faraji, F., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M.W. (2001) Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 25: 613-623.
  • Fathipour, Y., Ahmadi, M. & Kamali, K. (2006) Life table and survival rate of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on different bean varieties. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37(1): 65-71.
  • Ferrari, M.C.F. & Schausberger, P. (2013) From repulsion to attraction: species- and spatial context- dependent threat sensitive response of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae to predatory mite cues. Naturwissenschaften, 100: 541-549. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1050-5
  • Gotoh, T., Sugimoto, N., Pallini, A., Knapp, M., Hernandez-Suarez, E., Ferragut, F., Ho, C.C., Migeon, A., Navajas, M. & Nachman, G. (2010) Reproductive performance of seven strains of the tomato red spider mite Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) at five temperatures. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 52: 239-259.
  • Gyuris, E., Szep, E., Kontschan, J., Hettyey, A. & Toth, Z. (2017) Behavioural responses of twospotted spider mites induced by predator-borne and prey-borne cues. Behavioural Processes, 144: 100-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.002
  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964) The genitical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1): 17- 52.
  • Humphreys, R.K. & Ruxton, G.D. (2020) The dicey dinner dilemma: Asymetry in predator-prey risk taking, a broadly applicable alternative to the life-dinner principle. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 33(3): 377-383.
  • Ito, K. (2019) Lethal attack of Schizotetranychus brevisetosus Ehara (Acari: Tetranychidae) on predatory midge larvae. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 24(2): 187-192.
  • Janssen, A., Faraji, F., van der Hammen, T., Magalhahes, S. & Sabelis, M.W. (2002) Interspecific infanticide deters predators. Ecological Letters, 5: 405-494.
  • Magalhahes, S., Janssen, A., Montserrat, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (2005) Prey attack and predators defend: counterattacking prey trigger parental care in predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 272(1575): 1929-1933.
  • McMurtry, J., De Moraes, G. J. & Sourassou, N. F. (2013) Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 18(4): 297-320.
  • Mirth, C.K. & Shingleton, A.W. (2012) Integrating body and organ size in Drosophila: recent advances and outstanding problems. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 3: 49. DOI: 10.3389/fendo. 2012.00049
  • Moghadasi, M., Zahedi Golpayegani, A., Saboori, A., Allahyari, H. & Dehghani Tafti, H. (2019) Tetranychus urticae changes its oviposition pattern in the presence of the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Typhlodromus bagdasarjani. Acta Biologica, 26: 65-81. DOI: 10.18276/ab.2019.26-07
  • Mori, K. & Saito, Y. (2004) Nest size variation reflecting anti-predator strategies in social spider mites of Stigmaeopsis (Acari: Tetranychidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56: 201- 206.
  • Murase, A., Fujita, K. & Yano, S. (2017) Behavioural flexibility in spider mites: oviposition sites shifts based on past and present stimuli from conspecifics and predators. Royal Society Open Science, 4: 170328. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170328
  • Overmeer, W.P.J. (1985) Rearing and handling. In: Sabelis, M.W. (Ed.), Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control. Vol. 1B. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 161- 170.
  • Palomares, F. & Caro, T.M. (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. American Nturalists, 153: 492-508.
  • Potter, D.A., Wrensch, D.L. & Johnston, D.E. (1976) Guarding, aggressive behavior and mating success in male two-spotted spider mites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 69: 707-711.
  • Sabelis, M.W. (1985) Reproductive strategies. In: Helle, W. & Sabelis, M.W. (Eds.), Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Vol. 1A. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 265-278.
  • Saito, Y. (1986) Biparental defence in a spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) infesting Sasa bamboo. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18: 377-386.
  • Saito, Y. (1990) Harem and non-harem type mating systems in two species of subsocial spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Population Ecology, 32(2): 263-278.
  • Saito, Y. (2010) Plant mites and sociality: Diversity and evolution. Tokyo, Springer, 187 pp. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-99456-5
  • Saito, Y., Chittenden, A.R. & Kanazawa, M. (2011) Counterattack success of a social spider mite against two predominant phytoseiid predator species. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 55(3): 249-258.
  • Saito, Y. & Takada, T. (2009) Conditions under which male-to-male aggression compromises cooperation in a game without learning. The Open Evolution Journal, 3: 1-8
  • Saito, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2017) Locking out predators by silk, a new counterattack behavior in a social spider mite. Ecological Entomology, 42(4): 422-429.
  • Santamaria, M.E., Arnaiz, A., Rosa-Diaz, I., Gonzalez-Melendi, P., Romero-Hernandez, G., Ojeda- Martinez, D.A., Garcia, A., Conteras, E., Martinez, M. & Diaz, I. (2020) Plant defenses against Tetranychus urticae: Mind the Gaps. Plants, 9(4): 464. DOI: 10.3390/plants9040464
  • Sato, Y., Tsuda, Y., Sakamoto, H., Egas, M., Gotoh, T., Saito, Y., Zhang, Y.X., Lin, J.Z., Chao, J. T. & Mochizuki, A. (2019) Phylogeography of lethal male fighting in a social spider mite. Ecology and Evolution, 9(4): 1590-1602.
  • Schausberger, P. & Hoffmann, D. (2008) Maternal manipulation of hatching asynchrony limits sibling cannibalism in the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(6): 1109-1114.
  • Schausberger, P. & Sato, Y. (2019) Parental effects of male alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) on ARTs of haploid sons. Functional Ecology, 33(9): 1684-1694.
  • Yano, J., Saito., Y., Chittenden, A.R. & Sato, Y. (2011) Variation in counterattack effect against a phytoseiid predator between two forms of the social spider mite, Stigmaeopsis miscanthi. Journal of Ethology, 29(2): 337-342.