Published November 21, 2022 | Version v1

Value of internal juguler vein distensability and carotid artery Doppler in assessment of fluid responsiveness in sever sepsis and septic shock patients

  • 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt

Description

ABSTRACT

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is becoming the choice of hemodynamic assessment tool in many intensive care units. It has been gaining popularity due to its noninvasiveness where the benefit far outweighs the risk.  The Doppler study of carotid artery circulation and internal juguler vein ultrasound are simple and overpasses this common limit among intensive patient. Moreover, it showed to be an easy-learning tool. Transthoracic echocardiography provides an accurate and noninvasive measurement of cardiac output. Measurements of VTI and its variations are directly correlated with variations in cardiac output. The standard definition of volume responsiveness is a >15% increase in cardiac output in response to volume expansion.

Key Words: Carotid artery, Internal juguler vein, sever sepsis and septic shock, TTE

REFERENCES

  1. Torio CM, Andrews RM. National inpatient hospital costs: the most expensive conditions by payer, 2011.Statistical Brief#160. Healthcare cost and Utilization Project (HUCP) Statistical Briefs. August 2013.
  2. Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR, Wunsch H, Kahn JM. Population burden of long-term survivorship after severe sepsis in older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc.2012;60(6):1070-1177.
  3. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, kallan MJ, Carr BG. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med.2013;41(5):1167-1174.
  4. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committte Including the Pediatric Subgroup.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign international guidelines for management of sever sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580-637.
  5. Rhee C, Gohil S, Klompas M. Regulatory mandates for sepsis care_reasons for caution. N Engl J Med.2014;370(18):1673-1676.
  6. Vincent J-L, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, et al; ICON Investigators. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380-386.
  7. Fleischmann  C, Scherag  A, Adhikari  NK, et al; International Forum of Acute Care Trailists. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis: current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015.
  8.  Mervyn Singer, Clifford S. Deutschman, Christopher Warren Seymour,  et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-810.
  9. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE: The pathophysiology and          treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:138-150. 
  10. Cohen J: The immunopathogensis of sepsis. Nature 2002, 420:885-891. 
  11. Vincent JL, Gerlach H. Fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Critical care medicine. 2004;32(11 Suppl):S451-4. Epub 2004/11/16.
  12. Dinh VA, Ko HS, Rao R, Bansal RC, Smith DD, Kim TE, Nguyen HB (2012) Measuring cardiac index with a focused cardiac ultrasound examination inthe ED. Am J Emerg Med 30:1845–51
  13. Huttemann E (2006) Transoesophageal echocardiography in critical care. Minerva Anestesiol 72:891.
  14. Song Y, Kwak YL, Song JW, Kim YJ, Shim JK (2014) Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth113:61–6
  15. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC (2009) Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 13(5):R142.
  16. Chisholm CB, Dodge WR, Balise RR, Williams SR, Gharahbaghian L, Beraud AS (2013) Focused cardiac ultrasound training: how much is enough? JEmerg Med 44:818–22
  17. Yong Y, Wu D, Fernandes V, Kopelen HA, Shimoni S, Nagueh SF, Callahan JD, Bruns DE, Shaw LJ, Quinones MA, Zoghbi WA (2002) Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of cardiac function in technically very difficult patients in the intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol 89:711–8
  18. Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F(2011) The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg113:523–8
  19. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot FR, Vallet B (2006) Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 907:808–16
  20. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Esposito DC, PasqualicciMde O, Damasceno MC, Schultz MJ (2012) Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.JAMA 308:1651–9.
  21. Porika Raju and Estari Mamidala (2015). Anti-diabetic activity of compound isolated from
    Physalis angulata fruit extracts in alloxan induced diabetic rats. The Ame J Sci & Med Res,
    2015,1(1); Pages 1 -6. doi:10.17812/ajsmr2015.11.1
  22. Pinsky MR, Payen D: Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005,9:566–572.
  23. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008, 134:172–178.
  24. Prekker ME, Scott NL, Hart D, Sprenkle MD, Leatherman JW: Point-of-care ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure: a comparison of three techniques. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:833–841.
  25. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring--a consensus of 16. Critical care (London, England). 2011;15(4):229. Epub 2011/09/03.    
  26. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134(1):172-8. Epub 2008/07/17.
  27. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Critical care medicine. 2006;34(5):1333-7. Epub 2006/03/25.
  28. Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B, Network CU-R. Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Rea Network. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2003;168(2):165-72. Epub 2003/07/10.
  29. Papadopoulos MC, Davies DC, Moss RF, Tighe D, Bennett ED. Pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy: a review. Critical care medicine. 2000;28(8):3019-24. Epub 2000/08/31
  30. Miguel Á Ibarra-Estrada Ibarra-Estrada et al. Critical Ultrasound Journal (2015) 7:12DOI 10.1186/s13089-015-0029-1
  31. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, Ronan A, Shah D, Vasaiwala S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2007;20(7):857-61. Epub 2007/07/10.
  32. Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Critical care (London, England). 2012;16(5):R188. Epub 2012/10/10.

Files

44.02n.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size
md5:72c570cf5281ef8d0ca9d9ec7c739345
1.5 MB Preview Download