Published November 9, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Dataset related to article "Anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 biologic drugs for scalp psoriasis: A single-center retrospective comparative study "

  • 1. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20072 Rozzano (Mi) - Italy
  • 2. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56,20089 Rozzano (Mi) - Italy AND Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy

Description

This record contains raw data related to article “Anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 biologic drugs for scalp psoriasis: A single-center retrospective comparative study"

Abstract

Scalp is a frequent localization of psoriasis that has a massive impact on patient's quality of life. Managing this psoriasis' manifestation is often challenging, thus biologic drugs are widely used as a treatment option in refractory scalp psoriasis. The aim of our study is to retrospectively compare the efficacy of anti-interleukin (IL) 23 drugs (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab) and anti-IL17 or anti-IL17RA biologics (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) in real-life patients affected by scalp psoriasis. One hundred twenty-seven patients with a clinical diagnosis of scalp psoriasis and a baseline scalp Physician Global Assessment ≥3 were enrolled; 65 patients were treated with anti-IL23 and anti-IL62 with anti-IL17 or anti-IL17RA. Statistical analysis trough χ2 test was performed in order to evaluate the percentage of response among the two groups of patients. Responders' percentage of patients under anti-IL23 was 41.5%, 75.4%, 88.1%, 87.5%, 93.7%, and 100% at Week 4, 16, 48, 96, and 144, respectively. In the group on anti-IL17 was 62.9%, 90.3%, 91.2%, 97.3%, 96.9%, and 95.2% at Week 4, 16, 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Both anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 appeared to be effective on scalp psoriasis; in particular patients treated with anti-IL17 drugs reached a faster significant reduction of the lesions; on the other hand, anti-IL23 monoclonal antibodies were slightly superior in maintaining the clinical improvement through the follow-up.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

This set of raw data is accessible under request because they include sensitive data.

Please write your request at biblioteca@humanitas.it

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Journal article: 34820969 (PMID)
Journal article: 10.1111/dth.15228 (DOI)