Identification of clinical and radiological predictors of outcome in head trauma patients in the emergency department
Authors/Creators
- 1. Emergency Department Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria, Egypt
- 2. Neuro-Surgery Department, University of Alexandria, Egypt
Description
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this investigation was to identify the clinical and radiological predictors of outcome including (age, GCS, RTS, GAP, CT finding, systemic injuries, mode of trauma and pupil reactivity) in patients with isolated head trauma presented to the Emergency Department at Alexandria Main University Hospital. Mortality rate is higher in older age group above of 60 (83%) it was highly significant (<0.001*). In patients having only tSAH (34% of total), 75 patients (62.5%) had poor outcome. patients had a GCS score 8 or less (72.72%) had GOS V score. Mortality rate is higher in patients with both dilated pupils (70%). There is a highly significant relation between hypotension and the outcome (p=<0.001*), 20%of patients were hypotensive when they presented in casualty, (78.5%) of them had poor prognosis. 81.25% of patients who had hypoxia at the time of presentation had unfavorable outcome. GAP and RTS score were high significantly associated with adverse outcome both of them with p value (<0.001*).
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, outcome, prediction.
REFERENCES
- Agrawal A1 et al : Characteristics of patients who died from traumatic brain injury in two rural hospital emergency departments in Maharashtra, India, 2007-2009.Int J CritIllnInj Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec; 4(4):293-7.doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.147521
- Asher SR et al Survival advantage and PaO2 threshold in severe traumatic brain injury: J NeurosurgAnesthesiol. 2013 Apr; 25(2):168-73 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318283d350.
- Bajracharya A, Agrawal A, Yam B, Agrawal C, Lewis O. Spectrum of surgical trauma and associated head injuries at a university hospital in eastern Nepal. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2010; 1:2–8.
- Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME, A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma1989, 29:623-629.
- Deepak Agrawal, Shejoy P Joshua, Deepak Gupta, Sumit Sinha, GD Satyarthee
Department of Neurosurgery, JPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India22-Apr-2011 - George K. C et al , Neurological outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury and its relationship with computed tomography patterns of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage; J Neurosurg 114:1510–1515, 2011
- Gupta Prashant K1 et al, CT Scan Findings and Outcomes of Head Injury Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. October-December, 2011.
- Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. Major causes of death. World Health Organization. Media Center Fact Sheets. [Last downloaded on 2013 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index2.html.
- Hoffmann M et al, Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow Coma Scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality, Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99 Supple 1:122-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7707.
- Hukkelhoven CW1 et al, Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients’ Neurosurg. 2003 Oct; 99(4):666-73.
- Hyun Soo Oh et al Comparisons of the Prognostic Predictors of Traumatic Brain Injury According to Admission Glasgow Coma Scale Scores - Based on 1- and 6-month Assessments ,Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (2006) Vol. 36, No. 4, 621 629.
- Jaspal Singh, Evaluation of trauma and prediction of outcome using TRISS method, 24-Oct-2011.
- Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1: 480–484.
- Lee Macon and Elizabeth Boskey, PHD Head injury:Published on August 15, 2012
- London School of Hygiene, Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury; BMJ 2008; 336-425.
- Lu HY1, Predicting long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury using repeated measurements of glasgow coma scale and data mining methods.J Med Syst. 2015 Feb; 39(2):14.doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0187-x.
- Miguel Rodríguez MD, Predicting Mortality from Head Injury: Experience of Sancti Spíritus Province, Cuba. MEDICC Review, July 2013, Vol 15, No 3
- Moamena El-Matbouly (67) Traumatic Brain Injury in Qatar: Age Matters—Insights from a 4-Year Observational StudyThe Scientific World Journal. 2013; 2013:354920.
- Molly McNett, A Review ofthe Predictive Ability of Glasgow Coma Scale Scores in Head-Injured Patients.J NeurosciNurs. 2007; 39(2):68-75.
- S C Ohaegbulam,Using the Revised Trauma Score to Predict Outcome in Severely Head Injured Patients in a Developing Nation – A Pilot Study,Journal of College of Medicine Vol. 12 (2) 2007: pp. 51-55.
- Stocchetti N, Pagan F, Calappi E, et al. Inaccurate early assessment ofneurological severity in head injury. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1131–40.
- TumulChowdhury,Pre-hospital and initial management of head injury patients: Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan-Mar; 8(1): 114–12081.