Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Compliance by Indian OERs: An Empirical Study of Swayam and E-PG Pathshala
Description
Open Educational Resources (OERs) improves the quality of teaching and learning with the increased availability of quality, relevant, less costly learning materials (access). This paper describes the accessibility results of two Indian OER initiatives: e-PG Pathshala (ePGP) (OCW) and SWAYAM (SwM) (MOOC) by using TAW accessibility checker. A targeted web-page of the websites is validated for errors, warnings and not reviewed under AAA conformance level of WCAG 2.1 guidelines. The outcomes are tabulated beginning with POUR (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable & Robust) principle following their guidelines where the accessibility of ePGP and SwM was compared. The statistical result shows that the overall number of problems appeared in the case of SwM is higher (i.e. 110) than ePGP (i.e. 101). Again, the results of the descriptive statistics revealed Mean =2.806 (ePGP) & 3.056 (SwM). The SD obtained were 3.241 (ePGP) & 4.472 (SwM). The Shapiro-Wilk Test for normality of data revealed non-normal data while the WCAG 2.1 POUR parameters were found to be positively correlated for ePGP and SwM (rs = 0.67, p <0.001).
Files
2. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Compliance by Indian OERs -- An Empirical Study of SWAYAM and E-PG Pathshala.pdf
Additional details
References
- Abdul Aziz, M., Wan Mohd Isa, W. A., & Nordin, N. (2010). Assessing the accessibility and usability of Malaysia Higher Education Website, International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr). https://doi.org/10.1109/iuser.2010.5716752
- Adepoju, S. A., & Shehu, I. S. (2014). Usability evaluation of academic websites using automated tools, 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr). https://doi.org/10.1109/iuser.2014.7002700
- Al-Khalifa, H. S. (2012). The accessibility of Saudi Arabia government Web sites: an exploratory study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0215-7
- Angkananon, K., Wald, M., & Ploadaksorn, P. (2020). Development and testing of a thai website accessibility evaluation tool. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10(5), 4900. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4900-4909
- Bakhsh, M., & Mehmood, A. (2012). Web Accessibility for Disabled: A Case Study of Government Websites in Pakistan, 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/fit.2012.68
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 145–175). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Conover, W. J., & Iman, R. L. (1981). Rank Transformations as a Bridge Between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics. The American Statistician, 35(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683975
- Csontos, B., & Heckl, I. (2020). Accessibility, usability, and security evaluation of Hungarian government websites. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00716-9
- Fundacion CTIC. (2020). TAW | Web accessibility and W3C standardization services. Retrieved November 2, 2020 from https://www.tawdis.net/
- E-PG Pathshala. (n.d.). Library and Information Science. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/Home/ViewSubject?catid=21
- Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four 'R's of openness and ALMS analysis: frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510903482132
- Internet World Stats. (2019). World Internet Users Statistics and 2019 World Population Stats. Retrieved November 4, 2020, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
- Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2016). Accessibility analysis of North Eastern India Region websites for persons with disabilities, International Conference on Accessibility to Digital World (ICADW). https://doi.org/10.1109/icadw.2016.7942530
- JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.12.2.0) [Computer Software]
- Jeba, M. T., Sadia, F., Rahman, T., Hossain, K. M. I., & Bhuiyan, T. (2019). Usability and Accessibility Testing: A Study on Public Sector and Government Websites of Bangladesh. Proceedings of ICETIT 2019, 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30577-2_59
- Noh, K., Jeong, E., You, Y., Moon, S., & Kang, M. (2015). A study on the current status and strategies for improvement of web accessibility compliance of public institutions, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0001-0
- OER Congress. (2017). WOERC Action Plan and Ministerial Statement – 2nd World OER Congress. Retrieved November 7, 2020, from https://www.oercongress.org/woerc-actionplan/
- Panda, S., & Chakravarty, R. (2020). Evaluating the web accessibility of IIT libraries: a study of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Performance Measurement and Metrics, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-02-2020-0011
- Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. (2014, July 2). India becomes the first country to ratify the Marrakesh treaty. Retrieved November 8, 2020 from https://pib.gov.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=106012
- Shah, B. P., & Shakya, S. (2007). Evaluating the web accessibility of websites of the central government of Nepal. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '07. https://doi.org/10.1145/1328057.1328154
- Swayam. (n.d.). Library automation and digitisation. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from https://swayam.gov.in/nd2_nou20_lb01/preview
- UNESCO. (2017, July 20). Open Educational Resources (OER). Retrieved November 7, 2020, from https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer