Published October 14, 2022 | Version v1

Model development for microchannel reactor systems for the production of hydrogen by methanol steam reforming

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2000 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, P.R. China

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2000 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, P.R. China

Description

The present study is directed to the model development for a parallel reaction system, especially a chemical processing micro-system, which can simultaneously carry out exothermic and endothermic reactions in separate micro-channels and simultaneously adjust feed composition and flow rates. Specifically, the present study relates to the model development for a catalytic process of steam-methanol reforming for the production of hydrogen in a microchannel heterogeneous reaction system. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed with respect to various factors pertaining to microchannel reactor systems. Steady-state analyses are carried out to investigate the effects of various key parameters on processes such as chemical reactions or heat and mass transfer in the system. To facilitate computational modeling of transport phenomena and chemical kinetics in the flowing system of complex chemical reactions involving gas-phase and surface species, steady-state analyses are performed and computational fluid dynamics is used. The boundary conditions relate macroscopic fluid flow at a catalytically active surface to the rates of surface reactions. Chemical reactions involving surface species significantly influence the boundary conditions. The mass fluxes of gas-phase species at the phase boundaries are balanced by the production rates of gas-phase species by surface reactions. The heat release and consumption due to a surface reaction must be included in the model. Endothermicity or exothermicity of surface reactions contribute to the energy balance at an interface. Heat fluxes in the solid phase are balanced by chemical heat release at the surface. The porous media model is applied to the computational domains of the catalytically active layers. The porous media involve surface reactions. Each porous medium is modeled by adding a momentum source term to the standard momentum conservation equations and by the modification of a heat conduction flux term to the standard gas phase energy balance equation. The predictions are in satisfactory agreement with the data obtained from experimental measurements.

Contributor: Junjie Chen, ORCID: 0000-0002-5022-6863, E-mail address: koncjj@gmail.com, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2000 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, P.R. China

Declaration of competing interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Files

Manuscript.pdf

Files (285.1 kB)

Name Size
md5:a30ed45ae188b74d2f846876e0d946ed
285.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] J.J. Lerou, A.L. Tonkovich, L. Silva, S. Perry, and J. McDaniel. Microchannel reactor architecture enables greener processes. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 65, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 380-385.
  • [2] M.T. Kreutzer, F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, and J.J. Heiszwolf. Multiphase monolith reactors: Chemical reaction engineering of segmented flow in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 60, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 5895-5916.
  • [3] A. Rouge, B. Spoetzl, K. Gebauer, R. Schenk, and A. Renken. Microchannel reactors for fast periodic operation: the catalytic dehydration of isopropanol. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 56, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 1419-1427.
  • [4] A.Y. Tonkovich, S. Perry, Y. Wang, D. Qiu, T. LaPlante, and W.A. Rogers. Microchannel process technology for compact methane steam reforming. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 59, Issues 22-23, 2004, Pages 4819-4824.
  • [5] B. Yang, T. Yuschak, T. Mazanec, A.L. Tonkovich, and S. Perry. Multi-scale modeling of microstructured reactors for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 135, Supplement 1, 2008, Pages S147-S152.
  • [6] A.L. Tonkovich, K. Jarosch, R. Arora, L. Silva, S. Perry, J. McDaniel, F. Daly, and B. Litt. Methanol production FPSO plant concept using multiple microchannel unit operations. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 135, Supplement 1, 2008, Pages S2-S8.
  • [7] A.L.Y. Tonkovich, B. Yang, S.T. Perry, S.P. Fitzgerald, and Y. Wang. From seconds to milliseconds to microseconds through tailored microchannel reactor design of a steam methane reformer. Catalysis Today, Volume 120, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-29.
  • [8] A. Tonkovich, D. Kuhlmann, A. Rogers, J. McDaniel, S. Fitzgerald, R. Arora, and T. Yuschak. Microchannel technology scale-up to commercial capacity. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Volume 83, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 634-639.
  • [9] K. Venkataraman, J.M. Redenius, and L.D. Schmidt. Millisecond catalytic wall reactors: dehydrogenation of ethane. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 57, Issue 13, 2002, Pages 2335-2343.
  • [10] S.K. Ajmera, C. Delattre, M.A. Schmidt, and K.F. Jensen. Microfabricated differential reactor for heterogeneous gas phase catalyst testing. Journal of Catalysis, Volume 209, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 401-412.
  • [11] G. Kolb, R. Zapf, V. Hessel, and H. Löwe. Propane steam reforming in micro-channels-results from catalyst screening and optimization. Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 277, Issues 1-2, 2004, Pages 155-166.
  • [12] A. Beretta and P. Forzatti. Partial oxidation of light paraffins to synthesis gas in short contact-time reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 99, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 219-226.
  • [13] I. Aartun, T. Gjervan, H. Venvik, O. Görke, P. Pfeifer, M. Fathi, A. Holmen, and K. Schubert. Catalytic conversion of propane to hydrogen in microstructured reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 101, Issues 1-3, 2004, Pages 93-99.
  • [14] D.W. Flick and M.C. Huff. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over a Pt-coated monolith versus Pt-loaded pellets: Surface area and thermal effects. Journal of Catalysis, Volume 178, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 315-327.
  • [15] M. Zanfir and A. Gavriilidis. Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 58, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 3947-3960.
  • [16] H. Butcher and B.A. Wilhite. Enhancing catalyst effectiveness by increasing catalyst film thickness in coated-wall microreactors: Exploiting heat effects in catalytic methane steam micro-reformers. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 143, 2016, Pages 47-54.
  • [17] G.D. Stefanidis and D.G. Vlachos. Intensification of steam reforming of natural gas: Choosing combustible fuel and reforming catalyst. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 65, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 398-404.
  • [18] V. Dupont, A.B. Ross, E. Knight, I. Hanley, and M.V. Twigg. Production of hydrogen by unmixed steam reforming of methane. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 63, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2966-2979.
  • [19] M. Zanfir and A. Gavriilidis. An investigation of catalytic plate reactors by means of parametric sensitivity analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 57, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 1653-1659.
  • [20] M. Zanfir and A. Gavriilidis. Modelling of a catalytic plate reactor for dehydrogenation-combustion coupling. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 56, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 2671-2683.
  • [21] J.R. Rostrup-Nielsen and I. Alstrup. Innovation and science in the process industry: Steam reforming and hydrogenolysis. Catalysis Today, Volume 53, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 311-316.
  • [22] D.L. Trimm. Coke formation and minimisation during steam reforming reactions. Catalysis Today, Volume 37, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 233-238.
  • [23] C.T. Goralski and L.D. Schmidt. Modeling heterogeneous and homogeneous reactions in the high-temperature catalytic combustion of methane. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 54, Issue 24, 1999, Pages 5791-5807.
  • [24] L.D. Pfefferle. Heterogeneous-homogeneous reactions and transport coupling for catalytic combustion systems: A review of model alternatives. Catalysis Today, Volume 26, Issues 3-4, 1995, Pages 255-265.
  • [25] R.L. Keiski, O. Desponds, Y.-F. Chang, and G.A. Somorjai. Kinetics of the water-gas shift reaction over several alkane activation and water-gas shift catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 101, Issue 2, 1993, Pages 317-338.
  • [26] J.A. Rodriguez. Gold-based catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction: Active sites and reaction mechanism. Catalysis Today, Volume 160, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-10.
  • [27] A. Brucato, M. Ciofalo, F. Grisafi, and R. Tocco. On the simulation of stirred tank reactors via computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 55, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 291-302.
  • [28] J.A.M. Kuipers and W.P.M.V. Swaaij. Computational fluid dynamics applied to chemical reaction engineering. Advances in Chemical Engineering, Volume 24, 1998, Pages 227-328.