Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published January 15, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors?

Authors/Creators

Description

Bohloolzadeh, Mehdi, Zahedi-Golpayegani, Azadeh, Saboori, Alireza, Allahyari, Hossein (2018): Reciprocal intraguild predation between Neoseiulus barkeri and Amblyseius swirskii (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): Does experience affect anti-intraguild predation behaviors? Persian Journal of Acarology 7 (1): 61-74, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v7i1.33806

Files

source.pdf

Files (868.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:15b790719a8cfb84f9aa172c9d2840fd
868.0 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFB79071FF8CFF84FFAA172C9D28FFFD

Cites
Publication: 10.1038/srep00728 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173727 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173731 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173733 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173735 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173737 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7173741 (DOI)

References

  • Abad-Moyano, R., Urbaneja, A. & Schausberger, P. (2010) Intraguild interactions between Euseius stipulatus and the candidate biocontrol agents of Tetranychus urticae in Spanish clementine orchards: Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 50(1): 23-34.
  • Abad-Moyano, R., Urbaneja, A., Hoffmann, D. & Schausberger, P. (2010) Effects of Euseius stipulatus on establishment and efficacy in spider mite suppression of Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis in clementine. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 50(4): 329- 341.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2008) Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions. Ecology, 89(6): 1640-1649.
  • Almeida, A. & Janssen, A. (2013) Juvenile prey induce antipredator behaviour in adult predators. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 59(3): 275-282.
  • Bernays, E.A. & Funk, D.J. (1999) Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266(1415): 151 -156.
  • Blackwood, J., Schausberger, P. & Croft, B. (2001) Prey-stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environmental Entomology, 30(6): 1103-1111.
  • Cakmak, I., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M.W. (2006) Intraguild interactions between the predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 38(1): 33-46.
  • Chase, J.M. (1999) Food web effects of prey size refugia: variable interactions and alternative stable equilibria. The American Naturalist, 154(5): 559-570.
  • Choh, Y., Ignacio, M., Sabelis, M.W. & Janssen, A. (2012) Predator-prey role reversals, juvenile experience and adult antipredator behaviour. Scientific Reports, 2: 728. DOI:10.1038/srep00728
  • Dicke, M. & Grostal, P. (2001) Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32: 1-23.
  • Faraji, F., Hajizadeh, J., Ueckermann, E.A., Kamali, K. & McMurtry, J.A. (2007) Two new records for Iranian phytoseiid mites with synonymy and keys to the species of Typhloseiulus Chant and McMurtry and Phytoseiidae in Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Acarology, 33: 231-239.
  • Gerson, U., Smiley, R.L. & Ochoa, R. (2008) Mites (Acari) for pest control. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 560 pp.
  • Hatherly, I.S., Bale, J.S. & Walters, K.F.A. (2005) Intraguild predation and feeding preferences in three species of phytoseiid mite used for biological control. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 37(1): 43-55.
  • Janssen, A., Faraji, F., van der Hammen, T., Magalhaes, S. & Sabelis, M.W. (2002) Interspecific infanticide deters predators. Ecology Letters, 5(4): 490-494.
  • Kats, L.B. & Dill, L.M. (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience, 5(3): 361-394.
  • Lima, S.L. & Dill, L.M. (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68(4): 619-640.
  • Mahjoori, M., Hajizadeh, J. & Mozhdehi, M.R.A. (2015) A checklist and a key for the phytoseiid and blattisociid mites (Acari: Phytoseioidea) associated with olive orchards in Guilan Province Iran. Entomofauna, 36(8): 97-108.
  • Maleknia, B., Fathipour, Y. & Soufbaf, M. (2016) Intraguild predation among three phytoseiid species, Neoseiulus barkeri, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 21(4): 417-426.
  • McMurtry, J.A. & Croft, B.A. (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 42(1): 291-321.
  • Montserrat, M., Bas, C., Magalhaes, S., Sabelis, M.W., de Roos, A.M. & Janssen, A. (2007) Predators induce egg retention in prey. Oecologia, 150(4): 699-705.
  • Montserrat, M., Magalhaes, S., Sabelis, M.W., de Roos, A.M. & Janssen A. (2012) Invasion success in communities with reciprocal intraguild predation depends on the stage structure of the resident population. Oikos, 121: 67-76.
  • Papaj, D.R. & Vet, L.E. (1990) Odor learning and foraging success in the parasitoid, Leptopilina heterotoma. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16(11): 3137-3150.
  • Rahmani, H., Kamali, K. & Faraji, F. (2010) Predatory mite fauna of Phytoseiidae of northwest Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 34: 497-508.
  • Schausberger, P. (1997) Inter- and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 21(3): 131-150.
  • Schausberger, P. & Croft, B. (2000) Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 24(9): 709-725.
  • Seelmann, L., Auer, A., Hoffmann, D. & Schausberger, P. (2007) Leaf pubescence mediates intraguild predation between predatory mites. Oikos, 116: 807-817.
  • Van der Hammen, T., de Roos, A.M., Sabelis, M.W. & Janssen, A. (2010) Order of invasion affects the spatial distribution of a reciprocal intraguild predator. Oecologia, 163(1): 79-89.
  • Walzer, A., Paulus, H. & Schausberger, P. (2006) Oviposition behavior of interacting predatory mites: response to the presence of con- and heterospecific eggs. Journal of Insect Behavior, 19(3): 305-320.
  • Walzer, A. & Schausberger, P. (2011). Threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predation behaviour: maternal strategies to reduce offspring predation risk in mites. Animal Behaviour, 81(1): 177-184.