History as a Cultural Process in the Methodology of the Annales' "New Historical Science"
Description
The purpose of the article is to characterise history as a cultural process, relying on the historiography of the Annales school and periodicals that continue the ideas of the Annalist historians. The research methodology is related to the use of an interdisciplinary approach in cultural studies in combination with the systematic method as a key research methodology, and the following research methods are also used: deductive and inductive, dialectical, as well as abstraction, and generalisation. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the consideration of the “new historical science” or “new intellectual history” of the Annales school as a factor that influenced the development of cultural studies. Conclusions. The article describes the Annales school and provides an analysis of its role in the development of the historiographic trend in cultural research. In particular, the paper distinguishes between historiography and history. The former is based on the study of the historical literature of a particular subject and is synonymous with historical literature, and the latter appears both as a science of the past and as a set of facts of the past. The Annales school is considered a breakthrough in the field of historiography and history. It was a reaction to the crisis that gripped the humanities in the 19th century. The Annales school is associated with the concept of “new history”: a total, comprehensive, problematic, and human-centred history, immersed in everyday life. Traditionally, there are four generations of the Annales school: the first generation includes M. Bloch and L. Febvre, the second — F. Braudel and E. Labrousse, the third — G. Duby, J. Le Goff, P. Aries, and E. Le Roy Ladurie, finally, the fourth — B. Lepetit, J. Revel and J. C. Schmitt.
Files
History_as_a_Cultural_Process_in_the_Methodology_of_the_Annales_New_Historical_Science.pdf
Files
(777.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:55496019343837843af49ebca34209d2
|
777.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Anheim, É. (2012). L'historiographie est-elle une forme d'histoire intellectuelle? La controverse de 1934 entre Lucien Febvre et Henri Jassemin [Is Historiography a form of Intellectual History? The 1934 Controversy Between Lucien Febvre and Henri Jassemin]. Revue D'histoire Moderne & Contemporaine, 5(59-4bis), 105–130 [in French].
- Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales (Annales HSS). (n. d.). http://annales.ehess.fr/ [in French].
- Bushkovskaia, E. A. (2010). Fenomen mezhdistsiplinarnosti v zarubezhnykh issledovaniya [The Phenomenon of Interdisciplinarity in Foreign Research]. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Narodnoe Obrazovanie. Pedagogika, 330, 152–155 [in Russian].
- Fournier, M. (2007). La nouvelle histoire. L'explosion du territoire historien [The New Story. The Explosion of the Historical Territory]. Sciences Humaines, 6. https://www.scienceshumaines.com/la-nouvelle-histoire-l-explosion-du-territoire-historien_fr_21380.html [in French].
- Genin, Ch. (2006). Les études culturelles: une résistance française? [Cultural Studies: a French Resistance]. MEI, 24–25 ("Études culturelles/Cultural Studies"), 43–55 [in French].
- Hartley, J. (2003). A Short History of Cultural Studies. SAGE Publications Ltd [in English].
- Huppert, G. (1982). Lucien Febvre and Marc Bloch: The Creation of the Annales. The French Review, 55, 510–513 [in English].
- Kolchinskii, E. I. (2008). Nauka, vlast' i obshchestvo v periody krizisov: istoriko-sravnitel'nyi analiz [Science, Power and Society in Times of Crisis: Historical and Comparative Analysis]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 15(1), 132–148 [in Russian].
- Krushelnytska, O. V. (2006). Metodolohiia i orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen [Methodology and Organisation of Scientific Research]. Kondor [in Ukrainian].
- Müller, B. (2022, April 4). Histoire (Histoire et historiens). Courants et écoles historiques [History (History and Historians). Trends and historical schools]. Encyclopædia Universalis. https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/histoire-histoire-et-historienscourants-et-ecoles-historiques/ [in French].
- Nosenok, B. E. (2021). Ukrainskyi proekt kulturalnykh studii: adaptatsiia ukrainskoho dosvidu [Ukrainian Project of Cultural Studies: Adaptation of the Ukrainian Experience]. Issues in Cultural Studies, 36, 137–147 [in Ukrainian].
- Revel, J. (1979). Histoire et sciences sociales: les paradigmes des Annales. Revue des Annales [History and Social Sciences: the Paradigms of the Annales. Review of the Annales]. Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 6, 1360–1376 [in French].
- Revue de Synthèse. (n. d.). Retrieved April 4, 2022, from https://synth.revuesonline.com/accueil.jsp [in French].
- Saetzianova, G. D. (2011). Filiatsiya idei vo frantsuzskoi istoricheskoi antropologii: ot Zh. Le Goffa k Zh.-K. Shmittu [Filiation of Ideas in French Historical Anthropology: from J. Le Goff to J.-C. Schmitt]. In Itogovaya nauchno-obrazovatel'naya konferentsiya studentov Kazanskogo universiteta 2011 goda [Final Scientific and Educational Conference of Students of Kazan University in 2011] (pp. 70–73). Kazan University [in Russian].
- Saveleva, I. M., & Poletaev, A. V. (2009). Klassika i klassiki v sotsial'nom i gumanitarnom znanii [Classics and Classics in Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].