Published July 31, 2020 | Version v1

Report on barriers to implementing E1st in the EU-28

  • 1. BPIE (Buildings Performance Institute Europe)
  • 2. IEECP (Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy)
  • 3. RAP (Regulatory Assistance Project)

Description

This report is focused on barriers to implementing “Energy Efficiency First” (EE1st) in the EU in several policy areas that are linked to energy use in the buildings sector (such as network codes, renewable energy policy, building regulations and others). These range from legal and regulatory, institutional and organizational capacity-related barriers, which consider the way that energy planning and policy operate including multilevel governance, to economic and social/cultural barriers (in relation to buildings, heating systems, etc.). The scope is deliberately wider than just buildings policy; for example, deciding whether to invest in energy network upgrades or demand-side responses is an application of the EE1st principle that also relates to the building sector.
The EE1st concept is still recent, so there is not yet a developed literature that specifically analyses the related barriers. This report thus begins by considering underlying barriers related to the key components that form the EE1st principle: barriers to demand-side resources (end-use energy efficiency in buildings and demand-response) and barriers to decision or planning frameworks (IRP – Integrated Resource Planning, or LCP – Least Cost Planning) that can ensure a level playing field for the comparison of demand-side and supply-side resources. These targeted literature reviews were used to draw a typology of barriers to prepare an online survey and structure the analysis of the 45 answers received from various stakeholders, with a larger representation from demand-side experts (energy efficiency or building experts) as this is the focus of the project.
The main messages from this survey are that:

 Political barriers are the category most frequently mentioned by respondents, suggesting that implementing the EE1st principle would be first and foremost a political decision.
 A majority of respondents stressed the lack of expertise, knowledge, awareness or understanding, which suggests that a proactive dissemination of good practices and case studies is important.
 Implementing EE1st can work only if every actor understands what it means for them: making E1st a common practice implies making EE1st part of everyone’s work.
 Multiple benefits of EE1st need to be considered and communicated more effectively among stakeholders, in line with one key element of the EE1st principle: using a broader scope in cost-benefit analysis.
 Making EE1st a common practice would require a cultural change along the whole chain of actors.
 Cultural barriers are related to actors’ own habits and practices as well as about breaking silo thinking.
 Other barriers specific to EE1st relate to possible reasons why supply-side options might be given priority, disregarding demand-side options: these aspects are at the core of the EE1st principle and complement the analyses done earlier on the background and definitions of EE1st by emphasising why we need to think beyond existing energy efficiency policies.

Files

ENEFIRST_D2-4_Barriers_to_EE1st.pdf

Files (2.0 MB)

Name Size
md5:897b2a09da27fce373ce8d311163e22d
2.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
ENEFIRST - Making Energy Efficiency First principle operational 839509