Published August 26, 2022 | Version v1

APPLICATION FEATURES OF SINGLE-LIFT UNITS FOR DUAL COMPLETION OF FACILITIES OF MIDDLE AND LOWER CARBONIC STRATA

  • 1. Deputy Head of Geological and Hydrodynamic Modeling and Development Department No. 4 PJSC TATNEFT, Almetyevsk, Russia
  • 2. PJSC TATNEFT, Almetyevsk, Russia
  • 3. Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of Department of Exploration and Development of Oil and Gas Fields Ufa State Petroleum Technical University (Oktyabrsky Branch), Oktyabrsky, Russia Head of the department for organization of enhanced oil recovery operations PJSC TATNEFT, Almetyevsk, Russia

Description

Abstract

More efficient technologies should be introduced when developing mature fields to maintain the profitability of oil production. This article considers a unit for dual completion of several facilities, which makes it possible to develop strata, the individual exploitation of which is unprofitable. The considered unit also makes it possible to develop multilayer facilities in a single grid. Today there are many different types of dual completion units, the application of which depends on geological and physical characteristics of the facility and technical characteristics of the well. By design, dual completion units can be divided to single-lift and dual-lift units. The advantage of the dual-lift scheme is the ability to obtain direct information on the flow rate, water cut of the strata being developed and the bottom hole pressure of the upper stratum. During the application of the single-lift scheme, there is no possibility to directly determine the performance of each facility. The need to use single-lift schemes for dual completion is determined by the fact that small-diameter well technologies are actively used today. In a number of cases, when connecting the productive stratum with the implementation of single-lift dual completion, it was not possible to achieve an increase in the flow rate. The performed studies showed that the predicted oil flow rate was not achieved due to the decrease in productivity of the upper horizon and lack of bottom hole pressure control in the lower facility, as well as a requirement for the presence of differential pressure between the facilities for the correct work of equipment. One of the solutions to this problem is the introduction of more advanced units for dual completion.

Files

NJD_91-9-14.pdf

Files (827.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:5da6eba2df185c20b0432b6e148032d9
827.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. M. R. Arisar, M. Z. Hingoro, F. Abro, S. Nawab, I. A. Hullio Optimizing the Production from a Multizone Well by Selecting Appropriate Completion for a Well of Tal Block Pakistan / Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 3, 2019, 4108-4111 https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2677.
  • 2. S. Hamid, Ricki Jannise, G. Garrison, M. Coffin New Technology Provides Zonal Pressure Maintenance in Single Trip Multizone Completions / SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, October 2017. Paper Number: SPE-187221-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187221-MS.
  • 3. T. Grigsby, Ricki Jannise, A. Goodman, B. Techentien, Michael Schexnailder, Guy Navaira The Successful Development and Installation of a New Single-Trip Multizone Completion System Developed for the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Lower Tertiary Formation / Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 2016. Paper Number: OTC-27222-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/27222-MS
  • 4. S. Jacob, Khalid M. Naimi Advanced Well Completion Designs to Meet Unique Reservoir and Production Requirements / Paper presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, April 2014. Paper Number: SPE-172215-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/172215-MS.
  • 5. K. Muradov, E. Eltaher, D. Davies Reservoir simulator-friendly model of fluid-selective, downhole flow control completion performance / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Volume 164, May 2018, Pages 140-154.
  • 6. Babichev, I.N., Fattakhov, I.G., Kuleshova, L.S., Zaripov, L.F., Morozov, M.A. Potential for the wellbore zone development using the dynamic impact / IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 378(1), 012111.
  • 7. Nurgaliev, R.Z., Kozikhin, R.A., Fattakhov, I.G., Kuleshova, L.S., Gabbasov, A.Kh. Prospects for the use of new technologies in assessing the impact of geological and technological risks / IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 378(1), 012117.
  • 8. Nurgaliev, R.Z., Kozikhin, R.A., Fattakhov, I.G., Kuleshova, L.S. Application prospects for new technologies in geological and technological risk assessment / Gornyi Zhurnal, 2019, (4), p. 36–40.
  • 9. Kozikhin, R.A., Daminov, A.M., Fattakhov, I.G., Kuleshova, L.S., Gabbasov, A.K. Identifying the efficiency factors on the basis of evaluation of acidizing of carbonate reservoirs / IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 194(6), 062013.
  • 10. Bahtizin, R.N., Nurgaliev, R.Z., Fattakhov, I.G., Andreev, V.E., Safiullina, A.R. On the question of the efficiency analysis of the bottom-hole area stimulation method / International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 2018, 9(6), p. 1035–1044.
  • 11. Аминев, М.Х. Скважинное оборудование для ОРЭ: новые разработки, внедрение, сервис / М.Х. Аминев // Инженерная практика. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 28-35.
  • 12. Гарифов, К.М. История и современное состояние техники и технологии ОРЭ пластов в ОАО «Татнефть» / К.М.Гарифов // Инженерная практика. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 19-29.
  • 13. Гарифов, К.М. Применение одновременно-раздельной эксплуатации пластов в ОАО "Татнефть" / К.М. Гарифов, А.В. Глуходед, Н.Г. Ибрагимов, В.Г. Фадеев, Р.Г. Заббаров // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2010. - № 7. - С. 55-57.
  • 14. Дияшев, Р.Н. Особенности разработки многопластовых объектов / Р.Н. Дияшев и др. - Экспресс-информ. ВНИИОЭНГ. Сер. «Нефтепромысловое дело»,1987. - 203 с.
  • 15. Емельянов, А.В. Скважинные компоновки для одновременной добычи и обработки ПЗП / А.В. Емельянов // Инженерная практика. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 58-62.
  • 16. Мищенко, И.Т. Скважинная добыча нефти / И.Т. Мищенко. – М.: «Нефть и газ», 2003.– 816с.
  • 17. Ибрагимов, Н.Г. Новые технические средства одновременно-раздельной эксплуатации, разработанные в ОАО "Татнефть" / Н.Г. Ибрагимов, В.Г. Фадеев, Р.Г. Заббаров, Р.Н. Ахметвалиев, К.М. Гарифов, А.Х. Кадыров // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2008. - № 7. - С. 79-81.
  • 18. Хисамов, Р.С. Особенности геологического строения и разработки многопластовых нефтяных месторождений / Р.С. Хисамов. – Казань: изд-во «Мониторинг», 1996.- 288 с.
  • 19. Егорова Ю.Л., Низаев Р.Х., Иванов А.Ф., Фаттахов И.Г. Использование геологического и гидродинамического моделирования для изучения пространственного ориентирования трещин в карбонатных коллекторах на основе трассерных методов исследования / Нефтяная провинция. № 1(17) 2019, стр. 116-125.
  • 20. Фаттахов И.Г., Кулешова Л.С., Якубова Д.И., Мурдашева Л.В., Гафаров Р.Р., Шайдуллин Р.Р. Оценка эффективности водоизоляции на основе модельных исследований / Материалы 45-й научно-технической конференции молодых ученых, аспирантов и студентов. – Уфа: Изд-во УГНТУ, 2018. – С. 180–182.