Rating the best cell phones with multi-criteria analysis tools (CRITIC and AHP)
Authors/Creators
Description
Abstract The present research work applies different methods ofmulti-criteria analysis, to identify which is the best cell phone manufactured by thebest companies worldwide, in the year 2021. The methods applied are: a) Quantitativemethod AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) in Spanish Hierarchical Analytical Process proposed by Thomas Saaty in 1980. b) METHOD CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation). The work in question will be divided into four sections, the first is the Introduction, where it will be quickly addressed what is intended to be done in the research. In the Theoretical Framework section, the research related to the subject is explained. As a third point the Methodology, the way to apply the methodologies and the results obtained in this study is explained. To finalize the Results and Discussion, the results obtained will be analyzed, such as the differences between each model.
Files
CRITIC- AHP English.pdf
Additional details
References
- Aznar, J., & Guijarro, F. (2012). NEW VALUATION METHODS MULTICRITERIA MODELS. https://institutodevaluacion.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/06/NUEVOS-ME%CC%81TODOS-DEVALORACIO%CC%81N-MODELOS-MULTICRITERIO.pdf
- Fontalvo, R., Traeger, W., & Guevara, Y. (2018, March). Application of AHP and PL methodology for the purchase of a cell phone. working paper. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323825817_Application_of_AHP_and_P L_methodology_for_the_purchase_of_a_cell_phone_working_paper
- Ho, F., Wang, C. N., Ho, C. T., Chiang, Y. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2016). Evaluation of Smartphone feature preference by a modified AHP approach. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016- January, 591–594. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2015.7385716
- Jankowski, P. (1995). Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(3), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799508902036
- Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., & Bakar, E. M. N. E. A. (2015). A Short Survey on the Usage of Choquet Integral and its Associated Fuzzy Measure in Multiple Attribute Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 59, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2015.07.560
- Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R., & Ghazali, M. F. (2021). A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria. Symmetry, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060973
- Marković, V., Stajić, L., Stević, Ž., Mitrović, G., Novarlić, B., & Radojičić, Z. (2020). A Novel Integrated Subjective-Objective MCDM Model for Alternative Ranking in Order to Achieve Business Excellence and Sustainability. Symmetry 2020, Vol. 12, Page 164, 12(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12010164
- Martí, A. (2022, January 17). The best mobiles of the year (2021): their analysis and videos are here. Engadget. https://www.xataka.com/analisis/mejores-moviles-ano2021-analisis-videos
- Md Saad, R., Ahmad, M. Z., Abu, M. S., & Jusoh, M. S. (2014). Hamming distance method with subjective and objective weights for personnel selection. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/865495
- Moreno, M. (n.d.). THE HIERARCHICAL ANALYTICAL PROCESS (AHP). FUNDAMENTALS, METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~nbaloian/DSSDCC/ExplanationMethodAHP(ve%20rpaginas11-16).pdf
- OE. (2022). What are the best brands of cell phones in this 2022? OEchsle. https://www.oechsle.pe/inspira/marcas-de-celulares-2021/
- Okfalisa, O., Rusnedy, H., Iswavigra, D. U., Pranggono, B., Haerani, E. H., & Saktioto, S. (2020). DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SMARTPHONE RECOMMENDATION: THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY ANP IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING. SINERGI, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22441/SINERGI.2021.1.013
- Parameshwaran, R., Praveen Kumar, S., & Saravanakumar, K. (2015). An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria. Applied Soft Computing, 26, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2014.09.025
- Peaw, T. L., & Mustafa, A. (2006). Incorporating AHP in DEA Analysis for Smartphone Comparisons.
- Piasecki, M., & Kostyrko, K. (2020). Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method. Energies 2020, Vol. 13, Page 3120, 13(12), 3120. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN13123120
- Rodriguez, E. (2022, July 15). In search of the best mobiles MODEL 5: buying guide depending on budget, tastes and quality price. Engadget. https://www.xataka.com/seleccion/busca-mejores-moviles-Modelo 5-guide-buyfunction-budget-tastes-quality-pric
- Saaty, T., & Kearns, K. (1985). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Analytical Planning, 19–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8
- Sarmiento, L. E. (2014). Analysis and study of cellular mobile devices through selection, evaluation and prospecting methodologies to support new cellular mobile digital content, cellular mobile applications and cellular mobile services for the Colombian case [National University of Colombia]. In Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/55551
- Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J. J., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2018.12.001
- Vujičić, M. D., Papić, M. Z., & Blagojević, M. D. (2017). Comparative analysis of objective techniques for criteria weighing in two MCDM methods on example of an air conditioner selection. Tehnika, 72(3), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.5937/TEHNIKA1703422V
- Yerlikaya, M. A., Tabak, Ç., & Yıldız, K. (2019, July 15). Logistic Location Selection with Critic-Ahp and Vikor Integrated Approach. Data Science and Applications. http://jdatasci.com/index.php/jdatasci/article/view/22
- Zolfani, S. H., Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A. E., & Derakhti, A. (2020). Application of a Gray-Based Decision Support Framework for Location Selection of a Temporary Hospital during COVID-19 Pandemic. Symmetry 2020, Vol. 12, Page 886, 12(6), 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12060886