Published July 20, 2022 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

ACTUALIZAREA STANDARDELOR TEXTUALITĂȚII ÎN CADRUL DISCURSULUI PUBLICITAR

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Universitatea de Stat din Moldova

Description

The discourse analysis, linguistic or non-linguistic, verbal or non-verbal, is a complex, profound and varied study. One of the aspects of text and/or discourse analysis is the textuality and the principles/standards underlying textuality defined by R. De Beaugrande and D. Dressler (1981), later updated by J.-M. Adam (2001): cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativeness, situationality, intertextuality, context and cotext. Textuality is the property of a text not being reduced to a simple juxtaposition of sentences, which ensures the unity and irreducible singularity of a text. Based on the same textuality criteria, advertising discourse can also be analyzed. In this regard, we will try, in the following, to demonstrate the applicability of some of the criteria mentioned in the case of advertising. 

Files

Veste L. ACTUALIZAREA STANDARDELOR TEXTUALITĂȚII ÎN CADRUL DISCURSULUI PUBLICITAR.pdf

Files (569.7 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Adam J.-M. Linguistique textuelle. Des genres de discours aux textes. Paris : Nathan, coll. FAC, 1999. 208 p.
  • 2. Austin J.L. How to Do Thinks With Words. Second edition, Harvard University Press, 1975. 192 p.
  • 3. Byrne B. Relevance Theory and the language of advertising. CLS Occasional Paper No. 31, Trinity Coll., Dublin (Ireland). Centre for Language and Communication Studies, 1992. 80 p.
  • 4. Charaudeau P. "Des conditions de la "mise en scène" du langage." In : Decrosse A., L'esprit de la société, Liège, Mardaga, 1993. pp. 27-65.
  • 5. Charolles M. "Études sur la cohérence et l'interprétation des discours". In : L'information grammaticale, N. 27, 1985. pp. 37-38.
  • 6. Coșeriu E. Lingvistica generală (interviu cu Eugen Coșeriu realizat de Nicolae Saramandu), București, Editura Fundației Culturale Române, 1996. 184 p.
  • 7. Coșeriu E. Lecții de lingvistică generală. Chișinău : Editura ARC, 2000. pp. 233-284.
  • 8. Coșeriu E. Omul și limbajul său. Studii de filozofie a limbajului, teorie a limbii și lingvistică generală. Iași: Editura Universității "A. I. Cuza", 2009. 458 p.
  • 9. Eluerd R. Langue et littérature : Grammaire, Communication et Techniques littéraires, Nathan. 1992. 448 p.
  • 10. Guțu, I. "La dimension axiologique du niveau métatextuel : approche herméneutique complexe". In : Probleme de lingvistică generală şi romanică. Actele colocviului ştiinţific cu participare internaţională in memoriam Grigore CINCILEI, Chişinău, 14 decembrie, 2012, tomul III. Coord. A. Lenţa, I. Guţu : Chişinău : CEP USM, 2013. pp. 73-48.
  • 11. Hansson S. "Calculated overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irelevance and repetition in administrative language". In : Journal of Pragmatics. Volume 84, Jully 2015. pp. 172-188.
  • 12. Henry P. "Constructions relatives et articulations discursives". In: Langages, no 37, 1975. pp. 81-98.
  • 13. Jollin-Bertocchi S., Les niveaux de langage, Paris : Hachette Supérieur, 2003. 127 p.
  • 14. López Díaz M. "L'hétérogénéité du discours publicitaire". In : Langage et Société, 2006/2, n° 116. p. 129-145.
  • 15. Maingueneau D., "Interdiscours". In: Charaudeau P. & Maingueneau D., Dictionnaire d'analyse du discours. Paris: Seuil, 2002. pp. 324-326.
  • 16. Mazzarella D. "The Deployment of Sophisticated Interpretative Strategies". In: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XV, No. 44, 2015. pp. 138-199.
  • 17. Millogos L. Introduction à la lecture sémiotique. Paris : L'Harmattan, 2007. 290 p.
  • 18. Noh E.-J. Metarepresentation. A Relevance-Theory Approach. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2000. 242 p.
  • 19. Origgi G. Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. In: Social Epistemiology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 26(2), 2013. pp. 221-235.
  • 20. Padilla Cruz M. "Pragmatic failure, epistemic injustice and epistemic vigilance". In : Language & Communication. Volume 39, November, Elsevier, 2014. pp. 34-50.
  • 21. Padilla Cruz M., "Vigilance Mechanism in Interpretation : Hermeneutical Vigilance". In : Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133, 2016. 11 p.
  • 22. Schott-Bourget V. Approches de la linguistique. Paris : Nathan, 2003. 128 p.
  • 23. Searle R.J. Les actes de langage. Essai de philosophie du langage. Paris : Hermann, 1972. 260 p.
  • 24. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd edition, 1995. 338 p.
  • 25. Sperber D. "Understanding verbal understanding". In: J. Khalfa (ed.). What is intelligence? Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 179-198.
  • 26. Sperber D. et alii. "Epistemic Vigilance". In: Mind & Language 25 (4), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2010. pp. 359-393.
  • 27. Topoliceanu H. "Discursul repetat în publicistica românească și italiană. Preliminarii pentru un studiu privind discursul repetat în textul jurnalistic italian". In: D. Irimia (coordonator), Limba română azi, Iași: Editura Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2007. pp. 457-458.
  • 28. Wilson D. "Metarepresentation in linguistic communication". In: UCL Working Papers in Linguistic 11, 1999. pp. 127-161.
  • 29. Глазков А. В. Внешняя. Прагматика Нарратива (Птолемей И Прагматика Текста), Вестник ПСТГУ III : Филология, Вып. 2 (42), 2015. с. 33–43.