Published July 19, 2022 | Version v1

Off-Stage Ecosystem Service Burdens: A Blind Spot for Global Sustainability

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Cranfield University/UK

Description

Abstract: The interdependence of social and ecological systems has never been more apparent than it is in today's globalized society. Environmental problems can be addressed more effectively using a science–policy framework that considers ecosystem services. Such analyses, on the other hand, frequently fail to take into account the repercussions that are difficult to see up close but are crucial for long-term global stability. Environmental stewardship, which we call "ecosystem service burdens," has off-stage implications on biodiversity as well as ecosystem services that need to be better understood by ecosystem-services scientists. These are especially relevant since they are frequently unfavorable and can have a considerable impact on decisions about ecosystem management. Scientists can better understand the off-stage implications of ecosystem services by including new analytical methods, such as life cycle assessment or risk-based techniques into their work. Both the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and also the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change must consider off-stage ecosystem service burdens in their evaluations of ecosystem health. In order to fully understand cross-scale interactions, it is essential to investigate off-stage loads more thoroughly.

Keywords: ecosystem services, biodiversity, global sustainability, environmental policy, off-stage repercussions, ecology burdens, accountability, climate change.

Title: Off-Stage Ecosystem Service Burdens: A Blind Spot for Global Sustainability

Author: Nikolaos N. Toumasis

International Journal of Novel Research in Civil Structural and Earth Sciences

ISSN 2394-7357

Vol. 9, Issue 2, May 2022 - August 2022

Page No: 16-20

Novelty Journals

Website: www.noveltyjournals.com

Published Date: 19-July-2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6861339

Paper Download Link (Source)

https://www.noveltyjournals.com/upload/paper/Off-Stage%20Ecosystem%20Service-19072022-8.pdf

Notes

International Journal of Novel Research in Civil Structural and Earth Sciences, ISSN 2394-7357, Novelty Journals, Website: www.noveltyjournals.com

Files

Off-Stage Ecosystem Service-19072022-8.pdf

Files (700.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:f45705bcf0bc7164d0ccb1ab57b6330f
700.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Journal article: 2394-7357 (ISSN)
Journal article: https://www.noveltyjournals.com/upload/paper/Off-Stage%20Ecosystem%20Service-19072022-8.pdf (URL)

References

  • [1] Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T., & Puma, M. J. (2017). Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature, 543(7647), 700-704.
  • [2] Geneletti, D. (2013). Sustainability assessment. Pluralism, practice and progress.
  • [3] Harfoot, M., Tittensor, D. P., Newbold, T., McInerny, G., Smith, M. J., & Scharlemann, J. P. (2014). Integrated assessment models for ecologists: the present and the future. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(2), 124-143.
  • [4] Hilborn, R. (2013). Environmental cost of conservation victories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9187-9187.
  • [5] Hoekstra, A. Y., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 3232–3237.
  • [6] Jackson, J. B., Kirby, M. X., Berger, W. H., Bjorndal, K. A., Botsford, L. W., Bourque, B. J., ... & Warner, R. R. (2001). Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. science, 293(5530), 629-637.
  • [7] Liu, J., Yang, W., & Li, S. (2016). Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(1), 27-36.
  • [8] Mace, G. M., Hails, R. S., Cryle, P., Harlow, J., & Clarke, S. J. (2015). Towards a risk register for natural capital. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(3), 641-653.
  • [9] Naeem, S., Ingram, J. C., Varga, A., Agardy, T., Barten, P., Bennett, G., ... & Wunder, S. (2015). Get the science right when paying for nature's services. Science, 347(6227), 1206-1207.
  • [10] Othoniel, B., Rugani, B., Heijungs, R., Benetto, E., & Withagen, C. (2016). Assessment of life cycle impacts on ecosystem services: promise, problems, and prospects. Environmental science & technology, 50(3), 1077-1092.
  • [11] Perrings, C. (2016). Options for managing the infectious animal and plant disease risks of international trade. Food Security, 8(1), 27-35.
  • [12] Scholes, R. J., Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Spierenburg, M. J., & Duriappah, A. (2013). Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 16-25.
  • [13] Schröter, M., Albert, C., Marques, A., Tobon, W., Lavorel, S., Maes, J., ... & Bonn, A. (2016). National ecosystem assessments in Europe: a review. BioScience, 66(10), 813-828.
  • [14] Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., ... & Simon, D. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(20), 7687-7692.
  • [15] Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223).
  • [16] WAVES partnership (2015) Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) Annual Report, Washington, DC: World Bank
  • [17] Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 112(20), 6271-6276.