ENERGY EFFICIENT CLUSTER-HEAD SELECTION BASED RESIDUAL ENERGY FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK
Authors/Creators
- 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vivekanandha College of Technology for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamilnadu
- 2. UG Students, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vivekanandha College of Technology for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamilnadu
Description
Wireless sensor networks (WSN) groups specialized transducers that give seeing services to Internet of Effects (IoT) bias with limited energy and storehouse offers Since relief or recharging of batteries in detector bumps is nearly insolvable, power consumption becomes one of the pivotal design issues in WSN. Clustering algorithm plays an important part in power conservation for the energy constrained network. Choosing a cluster head can meetly balance the cargo in the network thereby reducing energy consumption and enhancing continuance. Improved leach algorithm is used as the proposed algorithm to provide the best accuracy and involve high iteration. The algorithm evaluate initial energy, residual energy and an optimum value of cluster heads to select the next group of cluster heads for the network that suits for IoT implementation such as environmental protection, smart cities, and systems. LEACH algorithm improves the lifetime of the network in comparison to direct or multi-hop transmission but still has many obstacles. The choice of cluster heads is done randomly which does not ensure proper allocation and optimal solution.
Files
234.pdf
Files
(272.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:753868d3bf65b7c661c4a8ba0a5aa113
|
272.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. D. Bandyopadhyay and J. Sen, "Web of things: Applications and difficulties in innovation and normalization", Wirel. Pers. Communication., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 49-69, 2019. 2. L. Tan and N. Wang, "Future web: The web of things," in 2010 third International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), 2019, vol. 5, pp. V5- - 376. 3. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, "Web of Things (IoT): A dream, building unit, and future bearings," Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645-1660, 2018. 4. W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, "An application-explicit convention design for remote micro sensor networks," IEEE Trans. Wireless. Communication, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 660-670, 2020. 5. B. Bhuyan, H. K. D. Sarma, N. Sarma, A. Kar, and R. Shopping center, "Nature of administration (QoS) arrangements in remote sensor organizations and related difficulties," Wirel. Sens. Netw., vol. 2, no. 11, p. 861, 2018. 6. Y. K. Chen, "Difficulties and chances of the web of things," in seventeenth Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2012, pp. 383-388. 7. Q. Jing, A. V Vasilakos, J. Wan, J. Lu, and D. Qiu, "Security of the Internet of Things: viewpoints and difficulties," Wirel. Networks, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2481-2501, 2015. 8. W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, "Energy efficient correspondence convention for remote microsensor networks," in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, , p. 10 pp. vol.2-. 9. M. Chatterjee, S. K. Das, and D. Turgut, "An on-request weighted bunching calculation (WCA) for impromptu organizations," in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2000. GLOBECOM'00. IEEE, Vol. 3, pp. 1697-1701. 10. J. Xu, N. Jin, X. Lou, T. Peng, Q. Zhou, and Y. Chen, "Improvement of LEACH convention for WSN," in Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2012 ninth International Conference on, 201