There is a newer version of the record available.

Published July 29, 2022 | Version 1

Merging Predictions from Cell Morphology and Chemical Fingerprint Models by Leveraging Similarity to Training Data

Description

The applicability domain of machine learning models trained on structural fingerprints for the prediction of biological endpoints, is often limited by the diversity of chemical space of the training data. In this work, we developed “similarity-based merger models” which combined the output of  individual models trained on cell morphology (based on Cell Painting) and chemical structural (based on chemical fingerprints). Using a combination of a decision tree and logistic regression models on the structural versus morphological feature space of the training data, which leveraged the similarity of test compounds to training compounds, the similarity-based merger models used logistic equations to weight individual model outputs We applied these models to predict assay hit calls of 92 assays from ChEMBL and PubChem and 89 anonymised assays released by the Broad Institute, where the required Cell Painting annotations were available. We found that, for the 181 assays used in this study the similarity-based merger model improved AUC in relative terms by 16.3% compared to the models using chemical structure alone (mean AUC of 0.75 vs. 0.64), and by 21.3% compared to the models using Cell Painting data alone (mean AUC of 0.62). Our results demonstrate that similarity-based merger models combining structure and cell morphology models can more accurately predict a wide range of biological assay outcomes and expand the applicability domain by better extrapolating to new structural and morphology spaces.

Notes

Release dataset

Files

broad_data_CP_filtered_16170.csv

Files (1.2 GB)

Name Size
md5:7ed168b6d0c1cdc2975f3fdc0156736b
63.1 MB Preview Download
md5:c22bcb45789de24e40ccf19c61400868
7.2 MB Preview Download
md5:b17de9bf28aee3ea84b00a949aaea862
11.9 MB Preview Download
md5:635daafefd295b1a48aeb19fc7674d55
1.1 GB Preview Download
md5:435810ea404aff77695a82fabb96c5d1
38.3 MB Preview Download
md5:be9cf4356e207aaa739681e878a7af60
3.1 MB Preview Download
md5:5dcd7fbd2c6320c5c060bcef2e6176d9
4.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Bray, M. A.; Gustafsdottir, S. M.; Rohban, M. H.; Singh, S.; Ljosa, V.; Sokolnicki, K. L.; Bittker, J. A.; Bodycombe, N. E.; Dančík, V.; Hasaka, T. P.; Hon, C. S.; Kemp, M. M.; Li, K.; Walpita, D.; Wawer, M. J.; Golub, T. R.; Schreiber, S. L.; Clemons, P. A.; Shamji, A. F.; Carpenter, A. E. A Dataset of Images and Morphological Profiles of 30 000 Small-Molecule Treatments Using the Cell Painting Assay. Giga-Science. 2017, pp 1–5.
  • Moshkov, N.; Moshkov, T.; Yang, K.; Horvath, P.; Dancik, V.; Wagner, B. K.; Clemons, P. A.; Singh, S.; Carpenter, A. E.; Caicedo, J. C. Predicting Compound Activity from Phenotypic Profiles and Chem-ical Structures. bioRxiv 2022, 2020.12.15.422887