Published May 25, 2022 | Version v1

Risk Identification and Assessment of Mega Industrial Projects in Egypt

  • 1. PHD Candidate Faculty of Engineering at Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • 2. Associate professor of construction Engineering and Project Management, faculty of engineering at Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.

Description

Abstract: Owners tend to use (custom) contracts to suit their project needs and specifications, and they often assign excessive risks to contractors.  The current paper's goal is to look into the current risk distribution in Mega industrial projects in Egypt. Where correctly identifying, assessing, and allocating risks in contracts can improve project performance. Based on an extensive literature review, the study identified 70 risk factors that are divided into nine groups. The respondents were asked to estimate the probability, impact, and way to control these risk factors. The results indicate that there is a problem in allocating risks in these projects and the top-ranked risk factors are procurement Problems, subcontractors' failure to comply with the schedule, unclear responsibility matrix, indecisive management, compliance risks (H&SE), and delay due to permit and consent from statutory bodies. These risk factors demonstrated that the current risk allocation practice in construction projects is inefficient and led to several other problems, such as claims, disputes, and aggressive relationships. The research is divided into two papers, Paper II will discuss how to mitigate these problems by redistributing risks equitably in a balanced construction contract to eliminate conflicts and adversarial relationships. The study's findings may help practitioners in allocating risks to partners who are better able to assess, control, and manage them. The risk ranking that was produced can be used to evaluate risks for contingency planning.

Keywords: Risk allocation, Relative Importance Index, Frequency-Adjusted Frequency Index, Risk identification, optimal risk, risk management.

Title: Risk Identification and Assessment of Mega Industrial Projects in Egypt

Author: Mona Abdel Hamid Hassanen, Ahmed Mohammed Abdelalim

International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations 

ISSN 2348-7585 (Online)

Vol. 10, Issue 1, April 2022 - September 2022

Page No: 187-199

Research Publish Journals

Website: www.researchpublish.com

Published Date: 25-May-2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6579176

Paper Download Link (Source):

https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/risk-identification-and-assessment-of-mega-industrial-projects-in-egypt

Notes

International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, ISSN 2348-7585 (Online), Research Publish Journals, Website: www.researchpublish.com

Files

Risk Identification-25052022-1.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size
md5:03ef9039a098f075958a8cac676a3e2c
1.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
Journal article: https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/risk-identification-and-assessment-of-mega-industrial-projects-in-egypt (URL)
Is published in
Journal article: 2348-7585 (ISSN)

References

  • [1] Abdullah, M.S., Alaloul, W.S., Liew, M.S. and Mohammed, B.S., 2018. Delays and cost overruns causes during construction of palm oil refinery projects. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 203, p. 02004). EDP Sciences.
  • [2] Adam, A., Josephson, P.E. and Lindahl, G., 2015. Implications of cost overruns and time delays on major public construction projects. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 747-758). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • [3] Andersson, C. and Gunnarsson, P., 2002. Contract Management: A Way of Increasing Profit in Construction Projects? Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
  • [4] ARCADIS, 2017, Construction disputes in the Middle East being resolved quicker than before
  • [5] ARCADIS, 2019, Construction disputes in the Middle East being resolved quicker than before
  • [6] Assaad, R., A. Elsayegh, G. Ali, M. Abdul Nabi, and I. H. El-adaway. 2020b. "Back-to-back relationship under standard subcontract agreements: Comparative study." J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 04520020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170 .0000406.
  • [7] Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020c. "Enhancing the knowledge of construction business failure: A social network analysis approach." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 04020052. https://doi.org/10.1061 /(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001831.
  • [8] Boateng, P., Chen, Z. and Ogunlana, S.O., 2015. An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp.1795-1811.
  • [9] Chang, C.Y., 2014. Principal-agent model of risk allocation in construction contracts and its critique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1), p.04013032.
  • [10] Dastyar, B., Esfahani, A.F., Askarifard, M. and Abbasi, A.M., 2018. Identification, Prioritization and Management of Construction Project Claims. Journal of Engineering, Project & Production Management, 8(2).
  • [11] El-sayegh, S. M. (2008). Risk Assessment and Allocation in the UAE Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, 431-438
  • [12] Eskander, R.F.A., 2018. Risk assessment influencing factors for Arabian construction projects using analytic hierarchy process. Alexandria engineering journal, 57(4), pp.4207-4218.
  • [13] Gandhi, M. and Dey, A., 2017. Avoiding an arbitration dispute. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, (09).
  • [14] GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES REPORT 2016. Contract Solutions DON'T GET LEFT BEHIND
  • [15] Groton, J., and Smith, R. J. (2010). "Realistic risk allocation: Allocating each risk to the party best able to handle it." Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)-International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution Research Rep., New York.