Published May 17, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT OBTURATION TECHNIQUES USING CBCT: AN IN VITRO STUDY

  • 1. Post Graduate Student, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research.
  • 2. Professor, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research.
  • 3. Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research.
  • 4. Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology And Oral Microbiology, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research.

Description

 

Introduction: Pulpectomy helps in preserving a pulpally involved primary tooth by extirpating the diseased pulp associated with microorganism and debris from the canal and obturating with an antibacterial resorbable filling material

Aim: To evaluate and compare the obturation quality interms of underfilling,optimal filling, over fillings, and voids in single rooted teeth amongst the 4 different obturation techniques using cone beam computed tomography( C.B.C.T.)

Method:40 freshly extracted single rooted teeth were collected and where arranged on U shaped arch ,each arch contained 10 teeth each and 4 groups and obturated with lentulospiral technique, local anaesthetic syringe, endodontic pressure syringe, pastinject technique.The assessment of obturation technique was done using CBCT. For evaluating quality of obturation and voids in the obturated canals, based on the following criteria given by Coll and Sadrian (1996)was used for CBCT and checked for Under filling ,Optimal filling ,Over filling and Voids.

Results: Pastinject showed 90% of optimal filled canals and minimum void. Endodontic pressure syringe showed minimum number of optimum filled canals(20%)

Conclusion: Pastinject technique of obturation proved to be the best in terms of optimal filling and less number of voids.

Files

12.pdf

Files (331.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0a80b2d71081246f39786bc0012aa57b
331.4 kB Preview Download