Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published May 1, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Automatic identification of bird females using egg phenotype

Authors/Creators

Description

Šulc, Michal, Hughes, Anna E, Troscianko, Jolyon, Štětková, Gabriela, Procházka, Petr, Požgayová, Milica, Piálek, Lubomír, Piálková, Radka, Brlík, Vojtěch, Honza, Marcel (2022): Automatic identification of bird females using egg phenotype. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 195 (1): 33-44, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab051, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/195/1/33/6357656

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFDCFF98FF82FFCF425EFFF2FFCFFFF2

Cites
Publication: 10.1101/2020.04.27.063933 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.6530633 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF33667EFF84FFC942D1FA55FF2DF9E7 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF33667EFF85FFC842FDFF36FB48FF28 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.6530637 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.6530639 (DOI)

References

  • Christians JK. 2002. Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biological Reviews 77: 1-26.
  • Christin S, Hervet E, Lecomte N. 2019. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1632-1644.
  • Davies N. 2010. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: A&C Black.
  • De la Colina MA, Pompilio L, Hauber ME, Reboreda JC, Mahler B. 2012. Different recognition cues reveal the decision rules used for egg rejection by hosts of a variably mimetic avian brood parasite. Animal Cognition 15: 881-889.
  • Ferreira AC, Silva LR, Renna F, Brandl HB, Renoult JP, Farine DR, Covas R, Doutrelant C. 2020. Deep learningbased methods for individual recognition in small birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1072-1085.
  • Fossoy F, Antonov A, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Vikan JR, Moller AP, Shykoff JA, Stokke BG. 2011. Genetic differentiation among sympatric cuckoo host races: males matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B: Biological Sciences 278: 1639-1645.
  • Fossoy F, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Antonov A, Dyrcz A, Moskat C, Ranke PS, Rutila J, Vikan JR, Stokke BG. 2012. Sex allocation in relation to host races in the broodparasitic common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). PLoS One 7: e36884.
  • Gibbs HL, Sorenson MD, Marchetti K, Brooke M de L, Davies NB, Nakamura H. 2000. Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo. Nature 407: 183-186.
  • Gomez J, Gordo O, Minias P. 2021. Egg recognition: the importance of quantifying multiple repeatable features as visual identity signals. PLoS One 16: e0248021.
  • Gosler AG, Barnett PR, James Reynolds S. 2000. Inheritance and variation in eggshell patterning in the great tit Parus major. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 2469-2473.
  • Hanley D, Sulc M, Brennan PL, Hauber ME, Grim T, Honza M. 2016. Dynamic egg color mimicry. Ecology and Evolution 6: 4192-4202.
  • Hauber ME, Luro A, McCarty CJ, Barateli K, Cassey P, Hansen ES, Dale J. 2019. Interannual repeatability of eggshell phenotype in individual female common murres (Uria aalge). Canadian Journal of Zoology 97: 385-391.
  • Hewson CM, Thorup K, Pearce-Higgins JW, Atkinson PW. 2016. Population decline is linked to migration route in the common cuckoo. Nature Communications 7: 1-8.
  • Holtje H, Mewes W, Haase M, Ornes AS. 2016. Genetic evidence of female specific eggshell colouration in the common crane (Grus grus). Journal of Ornithology 157: 609-617.
  • Honza M, Voslajerova K, Moskat C. 2007. Eviction behaviour of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus chicks. Journal of Avian Biology 38: 385-389.
  • Honza M, Sulc M, Jelinek V, Pozgayova M, Prochazka P. 2014. Brood parasites lay eggs matching the appearance of host clutches. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B: Biological Sciences 281: 20132665.
  • Hou J, He Y, Yang H, Connor T, Gao J, Wang Y, Zeng Y, Zhang J, Huang J, Zheng B. 2020. Identification of animal individuals using deep learning: a case study of giant panda. Biological Conservation 242: 108414.
  • Jelinek V, Sulc M, Stetkova G, Honza M. 2021. Fast and furious:hostaggressionmodulatesbehaviourofbroodparasites. Ibis 163: 824833. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.063933.
  • Jones OR, Wang J. 2010. COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 551-555.
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647-1649.
  • Kolecek J, Pialkova R, Pialek L, Sulc M, Hughes AE, Brlik V, Prochazka P, Pozgayova M, Capek M, Sosnovcova K. 2021. Spatiotemporal patterns of egg laying in the common cuckoo. Animal Behaviour 177: 107-116.
  • Krause J, Krause S, Arlinghaus R, Psorakis I, Roberts S, Rutz C. 2013. Reality mining of animal social systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 541-551.
  • Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. 940. Methods 9: 541.
  • Larsson K, Forslund P. 1992. Genetic and social inheritance of body and egg size in the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis). Evolution 46: 235-244.
  • Lindberg MS. 2012. A review of designs for capture-mark- recapture studies in discrete time. Journal of Ornithology 152: 355-370.
  • Linhart P, Osiejuk TS, Budka M, Salek M, Spinka M, Policht R, Syrova M, Blumstein DT. 2019. Measuring individual identity information in animal signals: overview and performance of available identity metrics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1558-1570.
  • Lyon BE. 2003. Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422: 495-499.
  • Maia R, Gruson H, Endler JA, White TE. 2019. Pavo 2: new tools for the spectral and spatial analysis of colour in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1097-1107.
  • Marchetti K. 2000. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Animal Behaviour 59: 877-883.
  • Moksnes A,Roskaft E,Rudolfsen G,Skjelseth S,G. Stokke B, Kleven O, Lisle Gibbs H, Honza M, Taborsky B, Teuschl Y. 2008. Individual female common cuckoos Cuculus canorus lay constant egg types but egg appearance cannot be used to assign eggs to females. Journal of Avian Biology 39: 238-241.
  • Morales J, Kim SY, Lobato E, Merino S, Tomas G, Martinez-de la Puente J, Moreno J. 2010. On the heritability of blue-green eggshell coloration. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1783-1791.
  • Moreno J, Osorno JL. 2003. Avian egg colour and sexual selection: does eggshell pigmentation reflect female condition and genetic quality? Ecology Letters 6: 803-806.
  • Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y, Kashiwagi K. 2005. Behavior of radio-tracked common cuckoo females during the breeding season in Japan. Ornithological Science 4: 31-41.
  • Oien IJ, Moksnes A, Roskaft E. 1995. Evolution of variation in egg color and marking pattern in European passerines: adaptations in a coevolutionary arms race with the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Behavioral Ecology 6: 166-174.
  • Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2012. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7: e37135.
  • Petruskova T, Pisvejcova I, Kinstova A, Brinke T, Petrusek A. 2016. Repertoire-based individual acoustic monitoring of a migratory passerine bird with complex song as an efficient tool for tracking territorial dynamics and annual return rates. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 274-284.
  • Petrzelkova A, Poysa H, Klvana P, Albrecht T, Horak D. 2017. Egg morphology fails to identify nests parasitized by conspecifics in common pochard: a test based on protein fingerprinting and including female relatedness. Journal of Avian Biology 48: 229-234.
  • Pialek L, Burress E, Dragova K, Almiron A, Casciotta J, Rican O. 2019. Phylogenomics of pike cichlids (Cichlidae: Crenicichla) of the C. mandelburgeri species complex: rapid ecological speciation in the Iguazu River and high endemism in the Middle Parana basin. Hydrobiologia 832: 355-375.
  • Pozgayova M, Pialkova R, Honza M, Prochazka P. 2018. Sex-specific nestling growth in an obligate brood parasite: common cuckoo males grow larger than females. The Auk: Ornithological Advances 135: 1033-1042.
  • Purcell S,Neale B,Todd-Brown K,Thomas L,Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, De Bakker PI, Daly MJ. 2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics 81: 559-575.
  • R Development Core Team R. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing.
  • Ramey JA. 2012. Clusteval: evaluation of clustering algorithms. Available online from https://CRAN. R-project. org/package=clusteval 666 (date last accessed 20 August 2020).
  • Rochette NC, Rivera-Colon AG, Catchen JM. 2019. Stacks 2: analytical methods for paired-end sequencing improve RADseqbased population genomics. Molecular Ecology 28: 4737-4754.
  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 671.
  • Soler M. 2017. Brood parasitism in birds: a coevolutionary point of view. In: Soler M, ed. Avian brood parasitism. Behaviour, ecology, evolution and coevolution. Cham: Springer, 1-19.
  • Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. 2010. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 8672-8676.
  • Stone M. 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 36: 111133.
  • Stowell D, Petruskova T, Salek M, Linhart P. 2019. Automatic acoustic identification of individuals in multiple species: improving identification across recording conditions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 16: 20180940.
  • Sulc M, Troscianko J, Stetkova G, Hughes AE, Jelinek V, Capek M, Honza M. 2019. Mimicry cannot explain rejection type in a host-brood parasite system. Animal Behaviour 155: 111-118.
  • Sulc M, Stetkova G, Prochazka P, Pozgayova M, Sosnovcova K, Studecky J, Honza M. 2020. Caught on camera: circumstantial evidence for fatal mobbing of an avian brood parasite by a host. Journal of Vertebrate Biology 69: 1-6.
  • Troscianko J. 2014. A simple tool for calculating egg shape, volume and surface area from digital images. Ibis 156: 874-878.
  • Van den Berg CP, Troscianko J, Endler JA, Marshall NJ, Cheney KL. 2020. Quantitative colour pattern analysis (qcpa): a comprehensive framework for the analysis of colour patterns in nature. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 316-332.
  • de Villemereuil P, Gimenez O, Doligez B. 2013. Comparing parent-offspring regression with frequentist and Bayesian animal models to estimate heritability in wild populations: a simulation study for Gaussian and binary traits. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 260-275.
  • Weinstein BG. 2018. A computer vision for animal ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology 87: 533-545.
  • Wyllie I. 1981. The cuckoo. London: Batsford.