Published February 21, 2022 | Version v1

Comparing PCR-generated artifacts of different polymerases for improved accuracy of DNA metabarcoding

  • 1. Research Center for Bioinformatics and Biosciences, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Yokohama, Japan
  • 2. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
  • 3. AXIOHELIX Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4. Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5. Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Description

Accuracy of PCR amplification is vital for obtaining reliable amplicon-sequencing results by metabarcoding. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of error profiles in the PCR products by 14 different PCR kits using a mock eukaryotic community DNA sample mimicking metabarcoding analysis. To prepare a mock eukaryotic community from the marine environment, equal amounts of plasmid DNA from 40 microalgal species were mixed and used for amplicon-sequencing by a high-throughput sequencing approach. To compare the differences in PCR kits used for this experiment, we focused on the following seven parameters: 1) Quality, 2) Chimera, 3) Blast top hit accuracy, 4) Deletion, 5) Insertion, 6) Base substitution and 7) Amplification bias amongst species. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for all of the seven parameters depending on the PCR kits used. These differences may result from the different DNA polymerases included in each kit, although the result can also be influenced by PCR reaction conditions. Simultaneous analysis of several parameters suggested that kits containing KOD plus Neo (TOYOBO) and HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (BiONEER, CA, US) at the annealing temperature of 65 °C displayed better results in terms of parameters associated with chimeras, top hit similarity and deletions.

Files

MBMG_article_77704.pdf

Files (1.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ceb2d6d29272791bb1e455c979d5926f
1.4 MB Preview Download

System files (157.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:216ba31284198ae247e39a92fd0c00b8
157.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details