Published February 8, 2022 | Version v1

Comparative phylogeography of two troglobitic Coleoptera (Leiodidae, Leptodirini) species from Romania based on mitochondrial DNA

  • 1. Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania|Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • 2. University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • 3. Unaffiliated, Berlin, Germany
  • 4. Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania|Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology, Bucharest, Romania
  • 5. Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania|Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Description

About 50 species of cave-obligate Leptodirini (Leiodidae) beetles have been described so far in Romania, most of them populating caves in the Apuseni Mountains (north-western Romania) and the Southern Carpathians. In this contribution, we present the first molecular phylogeographic study of the two troglobiotic Pholeuon species from the Apuseni Mountains. The two species are Pholeuon (s.str.) leptodirum and Pholeuon (Parapholeuon) gracile, endemic to Bihorului Mountains and Pădurea Craiului Mountains, respectively. To examine the genetic divergence within and between the two species we sequenced 571 bp of the mitochondrial COI gene in a total of 145 specimens, 56 specimens of the first species (collected in five caves) and 89 of the second species (collected in eight caves) across their geographic ranges. We found very low genetic variation, four haplotypes in P. leptodirum and seven haplotypes in P. gracile, and a maximum of 0.7% and 0.9% intraspecific divergence, respectively. However, a significant genetic divergence of 6.55% was found between species. The results are consistent with previous definitions of the two species based on morphological characters, while caution should be taken in considering attributions to different subspecies. Our research contributes to the phylogeographic information of troglobitic beetles, providing a solid basis for future comparison with other terrestrial or aquatic cave adapted species.

Files

SB_article_73524.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size
md5:d76c9f18f6191e60d6d3a40fe5393859
1.8 MB Preview Download

System files (144.2 kB)

Name Size
md5:1502b129e442805248b19d3e5abca494
144.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details