Published February 7, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Dataset related to article "Is Anti-Müllerian Hormone a Marker of Ovarian Reserve in Young Breast Cancer Patients Receiving a GnRH Analog during Chemotherapy?"

  • 1. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20072 Rozzano (Mi) - Italy
  • 2. Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Humanitas, Castellanza, Italy;
  • 3. Medical Oncology Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania, Italy;
  • 4. Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy;
  • 5. Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Humanitas, Castellanza, Italy; AND Medical Oncology Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania, Italy
  • 6. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56,20089 Rozzano (Mi) - Italy AND Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy

Description

 This record contains raw data related to article “Is Anti-Müllerian Hormone a Marker of Ovarian Reserve in Young Breast Cancer Patients Receiving a GnRH Analog during Chemotherapy?"

Introduction: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is the most reliable biomarker of ovarian reserve; however, its role in predicting ovarian recovery after chemotherapy is unclear. Administration of a GnRH analog (GnRHa) during chemotherapy significantly reduces the ovarian failure rate and increases the pregnancy rate. The available data on the behavior of AMH during concurrent administration of chemotherapy and GnRHa are inconsistent. We investigated whether concurrent administration of triptorelin and adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce the expected drop of AMH. Methods: Eligible patients were premenopausal women aged <40 years, with a diagnosis of early breast cancer, and candidates to 4–8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Triptorelin (3.75 mg i.m.) was started before chemotherapy and administered every 4 weeks thereafter. The principal endpoint was the proportion of patients with an AMH percent change ≤50% between 12 months after chemotherapy and basal levels. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving postchemotherapy AMH levels above the threshold of 0.2 ng/mL. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 of whom had blood samples available at baseline and 1 year after the end of chemotherapy. AMH decreased to nearly undetectable levels after chemotherapy and recovered after 12 months, but they did not exceed 1 tenth of the pretreatment levels. As for the secondary endpoint, 15 of the 31 patients recovered AMH levels above the threshold. Conclusions: This study did not reach its principal endpoint; however, the rate of 48% of patients who recovered AMH above threshold levels favorably compared with those in studies without concurrent GnRHa, supporting a better recovery of AMH with triptorelin.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

This set of raw data is accessible under request because they include sensitive data.

Please write your request at biblioteca@humanitas.it

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
10.1159/000514445 (DOI)