Published January 24, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Restrictive filling pattern in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Insights after surgical ventricular restoration

  • 1. Department of Cardiology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • 2. Division of Cardiology, Santo Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy. Electronic address: anna.toso@libero.it.
  • 3. Cardiac Surgery Department, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • 4. Cardiothoracic and Cardiovascular Department, IRCCS Vita-Salute University San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Description

Dataset from Fantini F, Toso A, Menicanti L, Moroni F, Castelvecchio S. Restrictive filling pattern in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Insights after surgical ventricular restoration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.173. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PMID: 31767363.

Abstract

Objective: To examine factors possibly involved in the resolution or persistence of restrictive filling pattern (RFP) after surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) in a series of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and RFP.

Methods: Echocardiography was performed at baseline (pre-SVR), discharge, and follow-up in 43 patients with ICM and RFP (E/A ratio ≥2). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on E/A ratio at discharge: improved (E/A ratio <2; 22 patients) and unchanged (E/A ratio ≥2; 21 patients).

Results: The improved group had a significantly increased mean deceleration time (from 137 ± 22 ms to 194 ± 68 ms; P = .002) and mean A wave velocity (from 43 ± 10 cm/s to 92 ± 37 cm/s; P = .001), and decreased E/e' ratio (from 27.7 ± 9.5 to 19.2 ± 7.8; P = .01) after SVR. The unchanged group did not show any significant variations in diastolic parameters. The only significant differences at baseline between the two groups were thinner left ventricle posterior wall and lower relative wall thickness (RWT) in the unchanged group. RWT was the sole baseline parameter independently associated with persistent RFP.

Conclusions: RFP was reversed after SVR in 22 of our 43 patients with ICM with a response that remained stable over time, associated with improved New York Heart Association class. RWT was the sole baseline echocardiographic parameter significantly associated with the evolution of RFP after SVR.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

These data are available upon duly motivated request to the corresponding author of the article

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here