Published January 24, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Nursing self-efficacy for oral anticoagulant therapy management: Development and initial validation of a theory-grounded scale

  • 1. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • 2. Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • 3. Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy.
  • 4. Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy
  • 5. Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • 6. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • 7. Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: rosario.caruso@grupposandonato.it.

Description

Dataset from Magon A, Arrigoni C, Fava A, Pittella F, Villa G, Dellafiore F, Conte G, Caruso R. Nursing self-efficacy for oral anticoagulant therapy management: Development and initial validation of a theory-grounded scale. Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;59:151428. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151428. Epub 2021 Mar 23. PMID: 33947515.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to develop and validate a nursing self-efficacy scale for OAC management (SE-OAM).

Background: Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) requires specific nursing competencies. Given that self-efficacy acts as a proxy assessment of nursing competence, its measurement is pivotal for addressing educational programs to enhance nursing competence in managing OAC. Thus far, the measurement of self-efficacy in OAC is undermined by the unavailability of valid and reliable tools.

Methods: A multi-method and multi-phase design was adopted: Phase one was a methodological study encompassing developmental tasks for generating items. Phase two comprised the validation process for determining the content validity, construct and concurrent validity, and internal consistency through two cross-sectional data collections.

Results: In total, 190 nurses were enrolled for determining the psychometric structure of the SE-OAM through an exploratory approach, and 345 nurses were subsequently enrolled to corroborate its most plausible factor structure derived from the exploratory analysis. The SE-OAM showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct, concurrent validity, good internal consistency, and stability. The final version of the scale encompassed 21 items kept by five domains: clinical management, care management, education, clinical monitoring, and care monitoring.

Conclusions: The SE-OAM showed evidence of initial validity and reliability, fulfilling a current gap in the availability of tools for measuring nursing self-efficacy in managing OAC. SE-OAM could be strategic for performing research to improve the quality of OAC management by enhancing nursing self-efficacy.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

These data are available upon duly motivated request to the corresponding author of the article

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here