Published December 15, 2021 | Version v1

Data from: A burning issue: Savanna fire management can generate enough carbon revenue to help restore Africa's rangelands and fill Protected Area funding gaps

  • 1. Biodiversity Research Institute
  • 2. The Nature Conservancy
  • 3. Cape York NRM
  • 4. Syracuse University
  • 5. Universidade Eduardo Mondlane
  • 6. University of Washington
  • 7. Wildlife Conservation Network
  • 8. Wildlife Conservation Society
  • 9. Oxford University
  • 10. National Conservation Area Administration of Mozambique

Description

Many savanna-dependent species in Africa including large herbivores and apex predators are at increasing risk of extinction.  Achieving effective management of protected areas (PAs) in Africa where lions live will cost an estimated USD >$1-2 B/year in new funding. We explored the potential for fire management-based carbon-financing programs to fill this funding gap and benefit degrading savanna ecosystems. We demonstrated how introducing early dry season fire management programs could produce potential carbon revenues (PCR) from either a single carbon-financing method (avoided emissions) or from multiple sequestration methods ranging from USD $59.6-$655.9 M/year (at USD $5/ton) or USD $155.0 M–$1.7 B/year (at USD $13/ton).  We highlighted variable but significant PCR for savanna PAs from USD $1.5–$44.4 M/year per PA. We suggest investing in fire management programs to jump-start the United Nations Decade of Ecological Restoration to help restore degraded African savannas and conserve imperiled keystone herbivores and apex predators. 

Open Access article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.013

Notes

Provided here are two tables and five zipped shapefiles and associated readme files.  The tables expand on the information provided in the publication (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.013). The shapefiles include the data used to produce figures 1 and 2 in the publication and figure S1 in the supplementary information. Table columns are often labeled as Mt for metric tonnes, not megatonnes. All emissions data expressed as tCO2eq/yr. Read the methods section in the publication for more details.

Files

fig1a_LDSminusEDS_tCO2e.zip

Files (10.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:99c838ef7dfc8936f36a23cd0e0eb309
98.6 kB Preview Download
md5:009b3ee36052617d21938f757cabdbc4
1.1 kB Preview Download
md5:7a032805d3c460eb520fa78fab1aebe0
6.4 MB Preview Download
md5:461ab72a92c0c2973d8bd7c657f2dd00
657 Bytes Preview Download
md5:6f0cdf55c80e166b53ef513b3f4c1446
229.8 kB Preview Download
md5:a81ddd8ef0dab2f323a1121fcc38ca58
1.1 kB Preview Download
md5:0fc3bc86220149f97fbf96a7ad59e8d7
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:a850b64cf7ec93a8bb73f74f0982301f
1.3 kB Preview Download
md5:99d7839ee9a6d43daf26e27888e40238
1.8 MB Preview Download
md5:3b08882204d2a9cb2cac6665c60b4c51
2.0 kB Preview Download
md5:8a340918d889c7fadbc5110b2257bf16
49.3 kB Download
md5:b6e033131b5f4c5aad0a0509b5bf0e40
1.4 kB Preview Download
md5:824d9f0ee272ed8525390c62767f624d
23.0 kB Download
md5:d5957473adcf5ae52f508ac8ed5636ba
531 Bytes Preview Download