Assessing Q&A Trends in Scholarly Communications: a Quantitative Study of ResearchGate
Authors/Creators
- 1. Chandigarh University
- 2. Panajb University
- 3. Panjab University
Description
The purpose of the study is to explore and analyse the disciplinary question and answer (Q&A) trends prevailing in the scientific social network (SCN)/scientific collaborative network (SCN) also known as an academic social network (ASN), ResearchGate (RG) and to examine the subject wise status of Q&A, content sharing trends of Q & A on RG and statistical analysis of various tests. The present study adopted a quantitative research design (Correlational as well as explanatory) to pursue the research questions and objectives for conducting the study. The data was collected from the research gate (RG) platform and 35 subjects were selected from the subject area and seven different types of variables were selected from each subject i.e., Posts, Questions, Publications, Articles, Preprints, Conference paper, Literature review. Various tests viz, Descriptive statistics, t-test, normality test and correlation, JASP software were performed for analysis of the data. The findings of the study reveal Findings of the study reveals the subject-wise status in different variables such as Statistics has the maximum number (4575) and Genealogy has the minimum number of posts (48) and so on. On the basis of the total content of the subject areas, the Literature review is (1%) followed by Preprints (5%), Questions (6%), Conference paper (7%), Posts (16%), Articles (65%). Publications possess maximum value while measuring central tendency (mean & median) & dispersion (std. deviation & std. error) and those are the minimum in the case of Literature Review. Publications, Preprints & Conference paper shows normal distribution (p>0.05) with low p-value, and the data-set for other four variables don’t possess a normal distribution (p<0.05). The statistics of the Student's t-test shows a maximum value in the case of ‘articles’ (viz. 50.19) and the ‘p’ value of all the variables taken to be <0.001 except literature review (i.e., 0.005). Among the 21 correlation types, 7 possess negative correlation value suggests the presence of no correlation between those variables. Whereas, the other 14 possess a positive correlation value ranges from 0.013 to 0.906 depending upon respective p-values.
Files
4. Assessing Q&A Trends in Scholarly Communications -- a Quantitative Study of ResearchGate.pdf
Additional details
References
- Admin. (2021, June 1). Top Free and Open-Source Statistical Analysis Software. Top IT Firms - Result of In-Depth Research & Analysis. https://www.itfirms.co/top-open-source-statistical-analysissoftware/#9
- Ayoub, A., Amin, R., & Wani, Z. A. (2020). The Leading Answerers of Social Q&A Sites: Exploring their Characteristics and Contributions. International Journal of Information Studies and Libraries, 5(2). http://www.publishingindia.com/ijisl/107/the-leading-answerers-of-social-q-a-sites-exploringtheir-characteristics-and-contributions/912/6285/
- Barbour, K., & Marshall, D. (2012). The academic online: Constructing persona through the World Wide Web. First Monday, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969
- Deng, S., Tong, J., & Fu, S. (2018, May 23). Interaction on An Academic Social Networking Sites. Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3197062
- Deng, S., Tong, J., Lin, Y., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Motivating scholars' responses in academic social networking sites: An empirical study on ResearchGate Q&A behavior. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102082
- JASP Team (2021). JASP (Version 0.14.1.0) [Computer Software]
- Jeng, W., DesAutels, S., He, D., & Li, L. (2016). Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23692
- Jeng, W., He, D., & Jiang, J. (2014). User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23225
- Li, L., He, D., Jeng, W., Goodwin, S., & Zhang, C. (2015). Answer Quality Characteristics and Prediction on an Academic Q&A Site. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2742129
- Li, L., He, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Evaluating Academic Answer Quality: A Pilot Study on ResearchGate Q&A. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9751, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-39396-4_6
- Li, L., He, D., Zhang, C., Geng, L., & Zhang, K. (2018). Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-11-2017-0246
- Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934093
- ResearchGate. (n.d.). Q&A Guidelines. ResearchGate Help Center. Retrieved June 18, 2021, from https://explore.researchgate.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=14155852
- ResearchGate. (2018). ResearchGate App (Designed for iPhone). Mac App Store. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/researchgate/id1208163937?ls=1
- ResearchGate. (2019). About ResearchGate. ; https://www.researchgate.net/about
- Sellke, T., Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2001). Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses. The American Statistician, 55(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339950
- Xiang, Y., Wang, R., Wang, Z., & Chen, Z. (2012, October). Extracting Keyphrase for Social Q&A Sites. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference