Published November 4, 2022 | Version v1

Detectability and impact of repetitive surveys on threatened West African crocodylians: Data M1

  • 1. Université Nangui Abrogoua
  • 2. Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves*
  • 3. Wildlife Conservation Society
  • 4. Florida International University

Description

West African crocodylians are among the most threatened and least studied crocodylian species globally. Assessing population status and establishing a basis for population monitoring is the highest priority action for this region. Monitoring of crocodiles is influenced by many factors that affect detectability, including environmental variables and individual or population-level wariness. We investigated how these factors affect detectability and counts of the Critically Endangered Mecistops cataphractus and the newly recognized Crocodylus suchus. We implemented 195 repetitive surveys at 38 sites across Côte d'Ivoire between 2014 and 2019. We used an occupancy-based approach and a count-based GLMM analysis to determine the effect of environmental and anthropogenic variables on detection, and modeled crocodile wariness over repetitive surveys. Despite their rarity and level of threat, detection probability of both species was relatively high (0.75 for M. cataphractus and 0.81 for C. suchus), but a minimum of two surveys was required to infer absence of either species with 90% confidence. We found that detection of M. cataphractus was significantly negatively influenced by fishing net encounter rate, while high temperature for the previous 48h of the day of the survey increased C. suchus detection. Precipitation and aquatic vegetation had significant negative and positive influence, respectively, on M. cataphractus counts and showed the opposite effect for C. suchus counts. We also found that fishing encounter rate had a significant negative effect on C. suchus counts. Interestingly, survey repetition did not generally affect wariness for either species, though there was some indication that at least C. suchus was more wary by the fourth replicate. These results are informative for designing future survey and monitoring protocols for these threatened crocodylians in West Africa, and for other endangered crocodylians globally.

Notes

There are misssing values on the dataset and I included the code used for imputed them.

Funding provided by: Save Our Species Fund*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017843
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Christmas CrocFest*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: St. Augustine Alligator Farm*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Oklahoma City Zoo*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Minnesota Zoo*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Future for Nature Foundation*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: AZA Crocodilian Advisory Group*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Files

Files (11.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:27461c64efd8717e4e5180076a6c2645
4.6 kB Download
md5:9cc807ffbf1d92b43f98ba27d94646b3
3.0 kB Download
md5:fea2f69afe399df4fe0f4268ef4c8c38
4.2 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is source of
10.5061/dryad.15dv41nz5 (DOI)