Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published April 30, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology

Creators

Description

Padial, José M., Chaparro, Juan C., Riva, Ignacio De La (2008): Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (4): 737-773, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00372.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00372.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e2d670e89bd3afb17500701e9b990fbf
1.4 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFD6FFE8FFD3FFB17500701EFF99FFBF
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD6FFE8FFD3FFB17500701EFF99FFBF

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10545900 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFD4FFB675E574ABFB43FB8B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFDFFFA175C77571FAD0FE50 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC3FFA3765E7222FE46FCFA (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC1FFA475B3739EFD6FF989 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC6FFA775AC769CFEA1FEE9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC5FFA775E57187FACFFAA6 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10545902 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC5FFA67667754AFD86F928 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC4FFAB75DE76D4FE3DFEE9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC9FFAB75C7718AFB38FBC4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10545904 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC9FFAA766874ABFF65FA12 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8790FFC8FFAA75FE75F9FC0BF998 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5442694 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5442696 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5442698 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5442700 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5442702 (DOI)

References

  • Alcaide de Pucci MFS, De Mopty S, Teran HR. 1992. Analisis histoquimico de las mucinas de la lengua de tres especies de la fam. Leptodactylidae (Anura). Acta Zoologica Lilloana 42: 35-40.
  • Boulenger GA. 1902. Description of new batrachians and reptiles from the Andes of Peru and Bolivia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7: 394-402.
  • Boulenger GA. 1903. Descriptions of new Batrachians in the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7: 552-557.
  • Cantino PD, de Queiroz K. 2004. Phylocode: a phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature, version 2b. Available at http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/
  • Caramaschi U, Canedo C. 2006. Reassessment of the taxonomic status of the genera Ischnocnema Reinhardt and Lutken, 1862 and Oreobates Jimenez de la Espada 1872, with notes on the synonymy of Leiuperus verrucosus Reinhardt and Lutken, 1862 (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Zootaxa 1116: 43-54.
  • Cei JM. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore Zoologico Italiano. Monografie 2: 1-609.
  • Cei JM. 1987. Additional notes to 'Amphibians of Argentina': an update, 1980-86. Museo Regionale Di Science Naturali Torino, Monografie 21: 209-272.
  • Chaparro JC, Pramuk JB, Gluesenkamp AG. 2007. A new species of arboreal Rhinella (Anura: Bufonidae) from cloud forest of southeastern Peru. Herpetologica 63: 203-212.
  • Crawford AJ, Smith EE. 2005. Cenozoic biogeography and evolution in direct-developing frogs of Central America (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus) as inferred from a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 536-555.
  • Darst CR, Cannatella DC. 2004. Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 462- 475.
  • Dayrat B. 2005. Toward integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407-415.
  • De la Riva I. 1990. Lista preliminar comentada de los anfibios de Bolivia con datos sobre su distribucion. Bolletino Del Museo Regionale Di Scienze Naturali, Torino 8: 261-319.
  • De la Riva I. 1993. Sinopsis del genero Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) en Bolivia y adicion de tres especies nuevas para el pais. Revista Espanola de Herpetologia 7: 97-105.
  • De la Riva I, Kohler J, Lotters S, Reichle S. 2000. Ten years of research on Bolivian amphibians: updated checklist, distribution, taxonomic problems, literature and iconography. Revista Espanola de Herpetologia 14: 19-164.
  • De Mopty S, Teran HR, Alcaide de Pucci MFS. 1992. Histomorfologia lingual en relacion con los habitos alimenticios en tres especies de anuros (Fam. Leptodactylidae). Acta Zoologica Lilloana 42: 143-148.
  • Doan TM. 2003. A south-to-north biogeographic hypothesis for Andean speciation: evidence from the lizard genus Proctoporus (Reptilia: Gymnophthalmidae). Journal of Biogeography 30: 361-374.
  • Doan TM, Arizabal W. 2002. Microgeographic variation in species composition of the herpetofauna communities of Tambopata region, Peru. Biotropica 34: 101-117.
  • Duellman WE. 1978. The biology of an Equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. University of Kansas Museum of Natural, History Miscellaneous Publications 55: 1-352.
  • Duellman WE. 1990. A new species of leptodactylid frog, genus Ischnocnema, from Peru. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 138: 1-7.
  • Duellman WE. 2005. Cusco Amazonico: the Lives of Amphibians and Reptiles in an Amazonian Rainforest. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986. The Biology of Amphibians. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.
  • Faivovich J, Hadad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to the Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294: 1-240.
  • Frost DR. 2006. Amphibian species of the world 4.0, an online reference. New York: American Museum of Natural History. 17 September 2006. Electronic Database accessible at http:// research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  • Frost D, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, De Sa R, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC. 2006. The Amphibia tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1-370.
  • Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. The frequency, causes and consequences of species level paraphyly and polyphyly: insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 397-423.
  • Gavetti E, Andreone F. 1993. Revised catalogue of the herpetological collection in Turin University. I. Amphibia. Museo Regionale Di Scienze Naturali Di Torino, Cataloghi 10: 1-185.
  • Glaw F, Kohler J. 1998. Amphibian species diversity exceeds that of mammals. Herpetological Review 29: 11-12.
  • Goebel AM, Donnelly JM, Atz ME. 1999. PCR Primers and amplification methods for 12S Ribosomal DNA, the Control Region, Cytochrome Oxidase I, and Cytochrome b in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 163-199.
  • Gonzalez JE. 2006. Anfibios colectados por la Comision Cientifica del Pacifico (entre 1862 y 1865) conservados en el Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid. Graellsia 62: 111-158.
  • Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in Dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58: 1781-1793.
  • Gregory-Wodzicki KM. 2000. Uplift history of the Central and Northern Andes: a review. GSA Bulletin 112: 1091-1105.
  • Harvey MB, Keck MB. 1995. A new species of Ischnocnema (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from high elevations in the Andes of central Bolivia. Herpetologica 51: 56-66.
  • Harvey MB, Sheehy CM. 2005. A new species of Ischnocnema (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from La Paz, Bolivia. Herpetologica 61: 268-275.
  • Haupl M, Tiedeman F, Grillitsch H. 1994. Katalog der Typen der Herpetologischen Sammlung nach dem Stand vom 1. Janner 1994. Teil I: Amphibia. Kataloge der wissenschaftlichen Sammlungen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien, Vertebrata 9: 1-46.
  • Hayek LA, Heyer WR, Gascon C. 2001. Frog morphometrics: a cautionary tale. Alytes 18: 153-177.
  • Hedges SB, Duellman WE, Heinicke MP. 2008. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): Molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa, in press.
  • Heinicke MP, Duellman WE, Hedges SB. 2007. Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 10092-10097.
  • Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Heyer WR, Gascon C. 1995. Collection notes and call characteristics for Ischnocnema quixensis and Phyzelaphryne miriamae (Amphibia: Anura; Leptodactylidae). Journal of Herpetology 29: 304-307.
  • Heyer WR, Munoz AM. 1999. Validation of Eleutherodactylus crepitans Bokermann, 1965, notes on the types and type locality of Telatrema[sic] heterodactylum Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937, and description of a new species of Eleutherodactylus from Mato Grosso, Brazil (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 112: 1-18.
  • Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. 1996. Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBAYES: Bayesian inferences of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 8: 754-755.
  • Hughes C, Eastwood R. 2006. Island radiation on a continental scale: exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 10334-10339.
  • Jimenez de la Espada M. 1872. Nuevos Batracios Ameri- canos. Anales de la Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural 1: 85-88.
  • Jimenez de la Espada M. 1875. Vertebrados Del ViaJe Al Pacifico. Batracios. Madrid: Imprenta Miguel Ginesta.
  • Kohler J. 2000. Amphibian diversity in Bolivia: a study with special reference to montane forest regions. Bonner Zoologische Monographien 48: 1-243.
  • Kress WJ, Heyer WR, Acevedo P, Coddington J, Cole D, Erwin TL, Meggers BJ, Pogue M, Thorington RW, Vari RP, Weitzman MJ, Weitzman SH. 1998. Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1577-1587.
  • Lavilla EO, Cei JM. 2001. Amphibians of Argentina. A second update, 1987-2000. Museo Regionale Di Science Naturali Torino, Monografie 28: 1-177.
  • Leviton AER, Gibbs H, Heal E, Dawson CE. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 3: 802-832.
  • Lynch JD. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of Leptodactylid frogs. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications 53: 1-238.
  • Lynch JD. 1974. A new species of leptodactylid frog (Ischnocnema) from the Cordillera del Condor in Ecuador. Journal of Herpetology 8: 85-87.
  • Lynch JD. 1976. The species groups of the South American frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 61: 1-24.
  • Lynch JD. 1986. The definition of the Middle American clade of Eleutherodactylus based on jaw musculature (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica 42: 248-258.
  • Lynch JD. 1989. Intrageneric relationships of mainland Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae). I. A review of the frogs assigned to the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group. Milwaukee Public Museum, Contributions in Biology and Geology 79: 1-25.
  • Lynch JD. 2001. Four osteological synapomorphies within Eleutherodactylus: (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) and their bearing on subgeneric classifications. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales 25: 127-136.
  • Lynch JD, Duellman WE. 1997. Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae) in western Ecuador: systematics, ecology, and biogeography. University of Kansas Natural History Museum Special Publications 23: 1-236.
  • Lynch JD, Myers CW. 1983. Frogs of the fitzingeri group of Eleutherodactylus in eastern Panama and Chocoan South America (Leptodactylidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 175: 481-572.
  • Lynch JD, Schwartz A. 1971. Taxonomic disposition of some 19th Century leptodactylid frog names. Journal of Herpetology 5: 103-114.
  • Padial JM, Chaparro JC, De la Riva I. 2007. A new species of the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis group (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from cloud forests of Peru. Herpetologica 63: 114-122.
  • Padial JM, De la Riva I. 2005. Rediscovery, redescription and advertisement call of Eleutherodactylus heterodactylus (Miranda Ribeiro, 1937) (Anura: Leptodactylidae), and notes on other Eleutherodactylus. Journal of Herpetology 39: 372- 379.
  • Padial JM, De la Riva I. 2006. Taxonomic inflation and the stability of species lists: the perils of ostrich's behavior. Systematic Biology 55: 859-867.
  • Padial JM, Gonzalez L, De la Riva I. 2005b. A new species of the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis group (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Andean humid montane forest of Bolivia. Herpetologica 61: 318-325.
  • Padial JM, Kohler J, Munoz A, De la Riva I. 2008. Assessing the taxonomic status of tropical frogs through bioacoustics: geographical variation in the advertisement call in the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152: 353-365.
  • Padial JM, Reichle S, De la Riva I. 2005a. A new species of Ischnocnema (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from the Andes of Bolivia. Journal of Herpetology 39: 186-191.
  • Pennington RT, Prado DE, Pendry CA. 2000. Neotropical seasonally dry forest and Quaternary vegetation changes. Journal of Biogeography 27: 261-273.
  • Peracca MG. 1895. Viaggio del Dott. Alfredo Borelli nella Repubblica Argentina e nel Paraguay. Rettili e Anfibi. Bollettino di Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata de lla R. Universita di Torino 10: 1-32.
  • Peracca MG. 1897. Viaggio del Dott. Alfredo Borelli nel Chaco boliviano e nella Repubblica Argentina. Rettili e Anfibi. Bollettino di Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata de lla R. Universita di Torino 12: 1-19.
  • Rannala B, Yang Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 304-311.
  • Reichle S. 1999. Zur Kenntnis dreier Leptodactylidae aus Bolivien, Ischnocnema sanctaecrucis Harvey & Keck, 1995, Eleutherodactylus fenestratus (Steindachner, 1864) und Eleutherodactylus samaipatae Kohler & Jungfer, 1995. Herpetofauna 123: 5-9.
  • Reichle S, Kohler J. 1997. A new species of Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from the Andean slopes of Bolivia. Amphibia-Reptilia 18: 333-337.
  • Reichle S, Lotters S, De la Riva I. 2001. A new species of the discoidalis group of Eleutherodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from inner-Andean dry valleys of Bolivia. Journal of Herpetology 35: 21-26.
  • Reinhardt J, Lutken Ch. 1862. Bidrag til kundsrab on Brasiliens paddes og krybdyr. Vodenskabelgige Meddelelser Fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I KJObenhavn, Series 2: 143-242.
  • Rodriguez LO, Duellman WE. 1994. Guide to the frogs of the Iquitos Region, Amazonian Peru. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Special Publications 22: 1-80.
  • Sambrook E, Fritsch F, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
  • Savage JM. 1987. Systematics and distribution of the Mexican and Central American rainfrogs of the Eleutherodactylus gollmeri group (Amphibian: Leptodactylidae). Fieldiana Zoologica 33: 1-57.
  • Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony* and other methods, version 4b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTALX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876- 4882.
  • Vences M, Kohler J. 2006. The current status of genetic exploration in amphibians: taxonomic and geographical disparities. In: Vences M, Kohler J, Ziegler T, Bohme W, eds. Herpetologica Bonnensis II. Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica. Bonn: SHE, 193-195.
  • Weir JT. 2006. Divergent timing and patterns of species accumulation in lowland and highland neotropical birds. Evolution 60: 842-855.
  • Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 844-851.
  • Wohltmann A, Kohler J, Martin P. 2006. Endoparasitic mite infections of anuran amphibians from Bolivian montane rain forests, with descriptions of two new Hannemania species (Acari: Parasitengona: Trombiculidae: Leeuwenhoekiinae). Organisms Diversity and Evolution 6: 141-150.
  • Yang Z, Rannala B. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.