Published March 4, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil

Description

Giacomini, Henrique Corrêa, Jr, Dilermando Pereira Lima, Latini, Anderson Oliveira, Espírito-Santo, Helder Mateus Viana (2011): Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 9 (1): 135-146, DOI: 10.1590/S1679-62252011005000011, URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-62252011000100012&lng=en&tlng=en

Files

source.pdf

Files (3.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d630120be866c5bd00ae378f725df41e
3.1 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:D630120BE866FFBDFFAEFF8F725DF41E

Related works

References

  • Berlow, E. L., A.-M. Neutel, J. E. Cohen, P. C. de Ruiter, B. Ebenman, M. C. Emmerson, J. W. Fox, V. A. A. Jansen, J. I. Jones, G. D. Kokkoris, D. O. Logofet, A. J. McKane, J. M. Montoya & O. Petchey. 2004. Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and oportunities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73: 585-598.
  • Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31: 343-366.
  • Chesson, P., M. J. Donahue, B. A. Melbourne & A. L. W. Sears. 2005. Scale transition theory for understanding mechanisms in metacommunities. Pp. 279-306. In: Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold & R. D. Holt (Eds.). Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Claessen, D., C. V. Oss, A. M. de Roos & L. Persson. 2002. The impact of size-dependent predation on population dynamics and individual life history. Ecology, 83: 1660-1675.
  • Cohen, J. E., T. Jonsson & S. R. Carpenter. 2003. Ecological community description using food web, species abundance, and body size. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, 100: 1781-1786.
  • Cohen, J. E., S. L. Pimm, P. Yodzis & J. Saldana. 1993. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 62: 67-78.
  • Cuddington, K. M. & P. Yodzis. 2000. Diffusion-limited predatorprey dynamics in euclidean environments: an allometric individual-based model. Theoretical Population, Biology, 58: 259- 278.
  • Drake, J. M. 2007. Parental investment and fecundity, but not brain size, are associated with establishment success in introduced fishes. Functional Ecology, 21: 963-968.
  • Drummond, G. M., C. S. Martins, A. B. M. Machado, F. A. Sebaio & Y.Antonini. 2005. Biodiversidade em Minas Gerais:Um atlas para sua conservacao. Fundacao Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, 222p.
  • Fernando, C. H. 1991. Impacts of fish introductions in tropical Asia and America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48: 24-32.
  • Godinho, A. L. 1994. The ecology of predator fish introductions: the case of Rio Doce valley lakes. Pp. 77-83. In: Pinto-Coelho, R. M., A. Giani & E. C. von Sperling (Eds.). Ecology and human impact on lakes and reservoirs in Minas Gerais with special reference to future development and management strategies. SEGRAC VL - EN, 193p.
  • Gotelli, N. J. 1991. Metapopulation Models: The Rescue Effect, the Propagule Rain, and the Core-Satellite Hypothesis. American Naturalist, 138: 768-776.
  • Herendeen, R. A. 2004. Bottom-up and top-down effects in food chains depend on functional dependence: an explicit framework. Ecological Modelling, 171: 21-33.
  • Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 12: 197-229.
  • Holt, R. D., J. Grover & D. Tilman. 1994. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. The American Naturalist, 144: 741-771.
  • Holyoak, M., M.A. Leibold & R. D. Holt. 2005a. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. The University of Chicago Press, 513p.
  • Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, N. M. Mouquet, R. D. Holt & M. F. Hoopes. 2005b. Metacommunities: a framework for large scale community ecology. Pp. 1-32. In: Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold & R. D. Holt (Eds.). Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. The University of Chicago Press, 513p.
  • Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54: 187-211.
  • Jackson, D.A., P. R. Peres-Neto & J. D. Olden. 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities - the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58: 157-170.
  • Kitchell, J. F., D. E. Schindler, R. Ogutu-Ohwayo & P. N. Reinthal. 1997. The nile perch in lake Victoria: interactions between predation and fisheries. Ecological Aplications, 7: 653-664.
  • Kolar, C. S. & D. M. Lodge. 2002 Ecological Predictions and risk assessment for invasive fish in North America. Science, 298:1233-1236.
  • Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76: 5-13.
  • Latini, A. O. 2005. Inventario rapido e identificacao de variaveis que limitam a dispersao de exoticos: um estudo sobre peixes no medio rio Doce. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brasil, 110p.
  • Latini, A. O., D. P. Lima-Junior, H. C. Giacomini, R. O. Latini, D. C. Resende, H. M. V. Espirito-Santo, D. F. Barros & T. L. Pereira. 2004. Invasive fishes in lakes of the Doce river basin (Brazil): range, new occurrences and conservation of native communities. Lundiana, 5: 135-142.
  • Latini, A. O., T. L. Pereira, R. O. Latini, H. C. Giacomini, D. P. Lima-Junior, D. P. Oporto & H. M. V. Espirito-Santo. 2005. Distribuicao e efeitos de peixes exoticos sobre a ictiofauna nativa dos lagos do Medio Rio Doce, MG, Brasil. Pp. 99-118. In: Rocha, O., E. L. G. Espindola, N. Fenerich-Verani, J. R. Verani & A. C. Rietzler (Eds.). Especies invasoras em aguas doces: estudos de caso e propostas de manejo. Editora Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, 416p.
  • Latini, A. O. & M. Petrere, Jr. 2004. Reduction of a native fish fauna by invasive species: an example from Brazilian freshwater tropical lakes. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11: 71-79.
  • Latini, A. O. & M. Petrere, Jr. 2007. Which factors determine nonnative fish range. A study on red piranha Pygocentrus nattereri (Kner 1858) introduced in Brazilian tropical lakes. Pp. 415-422. In: Gherardi, F. (Ed.). Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution, and Threats, Vol. 2. Book Series Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology.Springer,Amsterdam.
  • Layman, C. A. & K. O. Winemiller. 2004. Size-based responses of prey to piscivore exclusion in a species-rich neotropical river. Ecology, 85: 1311-1320.
  • Layman, C. A., K. O. Winemiller, D. A. Arrington & D. B. Jepsen. 2005. Body size and trophic position in a diverse tropical food web. Ecology, 86: 2530-2535.
  • Legendre, P., D. Borcard & P. R. Peres-Neto. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecological Monographs, 75: 435-450.
  • Legendre, P. & L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology., 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdan.
  • Leibold, M.A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P.Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M.F.Hoopes, R.D. Holt, J. B.Shurin, R.Law, D.Tilman,M.Loreau &A. Gonzalez.2004.The metacommunity concept:a framework for multi-scale community ecology.Ecology Letters,7: 601-613.
  • Leibold,M.A., R.D. Holt& M.Holyoak.2005.Adaptive and coadaptive dynamics in metacommunities: tracking environmental change at different spatial scales.Pp.439-464.In:Holyoak, M., M.A. Leibold & R. D. Holt (Eds.). Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities.The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lockwood, J. L., M. F. Hoopes & M. P. Marchetti. 2007. Invasion Ecology. Blackwell Publishing.
  • MacArthur, R. H. & E. O.Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 224p.
  • Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout & F.A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: cause, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications, 10: 689-710.
  • Magurran,A.E.2004.Measuringbiologicaldiversity.BlackwellScienceLtd.
  • Manly, B. F. J. 2004. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in Biology. University of Otago, Otago, New Zeland.
  • de Marco,P.Jr.1999.Invasion by the introduced aquatic snail Melanoides tuberculata (Muller, 1774) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia:Thiaridae) of the Rio Doce State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 34(3): 186-189.
  • McKinney, M. L. & J. A. Drake. 1998. Biodiversity dynamics: turnover of populations, taxa and communities. Columbia University Press, 552p.
  • McKinney, M. L. & J. L. Lockwood. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 450-453.
  • McPeek, M. A. 1996. Trade-offs, food web structure, and the coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. The American Naturalist, 148: 124-138.
  • Mittelbach, G. G. & L. Persson. 1998. The ontogeny of piscivory and its ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55: 1454-1465.
  • Morton,D.&R.Law.1997.Regional species pools and the assembly of local ecologicalcommunities.JournalofTheoreticalBiology,187:321-331.
  • Moyle,P.B.&T.Light.1996.Biologicalinvasionsoffreshwater:empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation, 78: 149-161.
  • Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. Fonseca & J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858.
  • Nimer, E. 1989. Climatologia do Brasil. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
  • Olden, J. D. 2006. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography.Journal of Biogeography,33: 2027-2039.
  • Olden, J. D., N. L. Poff, M. R. Douglas, M. E. Douglas & K. D. Fausch.2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19: 18-23.
  • Persson, L. 1985. Asymetrical competition: are larger animals competitively superior? The American Naturalist, 126: 261-266.
  • Persson, L., K. Leonardsson, A. M. de Roos, M. Gyllenberg & B. Christensen. 1998. Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. Theoretical Population Biology, 54: 270-293.
  • Pimentel, D., S. McNair, J. Janecka, J. Wightam, C. Simmonds, C. O'Connell, R. Wong, L. Russel, J. Zern, T. Aquino & T. Tsomond. 2001. Economic and environmental threats of invasive plant, animal, and microbe invasion. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 84: 1-20.
  • Rahel, F. J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 291-315.
  • Reis, R. E. 1997. Revision of the neotropical catfish genus Hoplosternum (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes: Callichthyidae), with the description of two new genera and three new species. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 7: 299-326.
  • de Roos, A. M., E. McCauley & W. G. Wilson. 1991. Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 246: 117-122.
  • Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Sih,A.,P.Crowley,M.McPeek,J.Petranka&K.Strohmeier.1985.Predation, Competition, and prey communities: A review of field experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16: 269-311.
  • Simberloff,D.&B.VonHolle.1999.Positiveinteractionsofnonindigenous species:invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions,1: 21-32.
  • Sinclair,A.R.E., S. Mduma& J. S. Brashares.2003.Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system. Nature, 425: 288-290.
  • Sunaga, T. & J. R. Verani. 1985. Preliminary report of comparative study on fish community of the Rio Doce Valley lakes. Pp. 167-174. In: Saijo, Y. & J. G. C. P. Tundisi (Eds.). Limnological studies in Rio Doce Valley lakes and Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Nagoya University, 187p.
  • Sunaga, T. & J. R. Verani. 1987. Second report of comparative study on fish community of the Rio Doce Valley lakes.Pp.129-135.In:Saijo, Y. & J. G. C. P. Tundisi (Eds.). Limnological studies in Rio Doce Valley lakes and Pantanal wetland, Brazil.Nagoya University, 187p.
  • Sunaga, T. & J. R. Verani. 1991. The fish communities of the lakes in Rio Doce Valley, Northeast, Brazil. Verhandlungen der internationalen Vereinigung fur, 24:2563-2566.
  • Thorp, J. H. & M. L. Cothran. 1984. Regulation of freshwater community structure at multiple intensities of dragonfly predation. Ecology, 65:1546-1555.
  • Tundisi, J. G. & M. R. M. de Meis. 1985. Geomorphology and limnological processes at the Middle Rio Doce Valley. Pp 11-17. In: Saijo, Y.& J.G.C.P. Tundisi (Eds.). Limnological studies in Rio Doce Valley lakes and Pantanal wetland, Brazil.Nagoya University.
  • Vono, V. & F. A. R. Barbosa. 2001. Habitats and littoral zone fish community structure of two natural lakes in southeast Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 61(4): 371-379.
  • Wellborn, G. A., D. K. Skelly & E. E. Werner. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27: 337-363.
  • Woodward, G., B. Ebenman, M. C. Emmerson, J. M. Montoya, J. M. Olesen,A. Valido & P.H.Warren.2005.Body size in ecological networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 402-409.
  • Woodward, G. & A. G. Hildrew. 2002. Body size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 1063-1074.
  • Wooton R. J. 1992. Fish ecology. New York, Blackie.
  • Zaret, T. M. 1972. Predator-prey interacion in a tropical lacustrine ecosystem. Ecology, 53: 248-257.
  • Zaret, T. M. & R. T. Paine. 1973. Species introductions in a tropical lake. Science, 182: 449-455.