Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 25, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Effects of traffic noise on vocalisations of the rhacophorid tree frog Kurixalus chaseni (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Borneo

Authors/Creators

Description

Yi, Yeo Zhi, Sheridan, Jennifer A. (2019): Effects of traffic noise on vocalisations of the rhacophorid tree frog Kurixalus chaseni (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Borneo. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67: 77-82, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0007

Files

source.pdf

Files (323.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:46ef84b6dd7bbcc9f9fb9fbf474b38da
323.1 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33930F05-837B-4CD7-8BCC-9A850B6EAB48
LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFEFFFB6DD7BFFC9FFFBFFBF474BFFDA

References

  • Araya-Salas M & Smith-Vidaurre G (2016) warbleR: an R package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(2): 184-191.
  • Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission (2010) Asia-Pacific Forests and Forestry to 2020, 5-6: 135-186. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/ i1594e/i1594e03.pdf. (Accessed 27 October 2017).
  • Audacity Team (2016) Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer application]. https://www.audacityteam. org/. (Accessed 27 September 2017).Barber JR, Crooks KR & Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(3): 180-189.
  • Bayne EM, Habib L & Boutin S (2008) Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy-sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conservation Biology, 22(5): 1186-1193.
  • Bee MA & Swanson EM (2007) Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise. Animal Behaviour, 74(6): 1765-1776.
  • Bioacoustics Research Program (2014) Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.5). The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/raven. (Accessed 2 October 2017).Blickley JL, Blackwood D & Patricelli GL (2012) Experimental evidence for the effects of chronic anthropogenic noise on abundance of greater Sage- Grouse at Leks. Conservation Biology, 26(3): 461-471.
  • Brumm H (2004) The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(3): 434-440.
  • Brumm H & Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 35(05): 151-209.
  • Brumm H & Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Animal Behaviour, 63(5): 891-897.
  • Caorsi VZ, Both C, Cechin S, Antunes R & Borges-Martins M (2017) Effects of traffic noise on the calling behaviour of two Neotropical hylid frogs. PLOS ONE, 12(8).
  • Charif RA, Waack AM & Strickman LM (2010) Raven Pro 1.4 User's Manual. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/brp/raven/Raven14UsersManual. pdf. (Accessed 12 October 2017).
  • Cunnington GM & Fahrig L (2010) Plasticity in the vocalisations of anurans in response to traffic noise. Acta Oecologica, 36(5): 463-470.
  • de Soto NA (2016) Peer-reviewed studies on the effects of anthropogenic noise on marine invertebrates: from scallop larvae to giant squid. In: Popper AN & Hawkins A (eds.), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Springer New York, New York, NY. Pp. 17-26.
  • Diesmos A, Alcala A, Brown R, Afuang L, Gee G, Sukumaran J, Yaakob N, Leong TM, Chuaynkern Y, Thirakhupt K, Das I, Iskandar D, Mumpuni, Inger R, Stuebing R, Yambun P & Lakim M (2004) Kurixalus appendiculatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004. https://www.iucnredlist. org/species/58972/11863326. (Accessed 17 September 2017). Dorado-Correa AM, Rodriguez-Rocha M & Brumm H (2016) Anthropogenic noise, but not artificial light levels predicts song behaviour in an equatorial bird. Royal Society Open Science, 3(7): 160231.
  • Dowling JL, Luther DA & Marra PP (2012) Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs. Behavioural Ecology, 23(1): 201-209.
  • Francis CD & Barber JR (2013) A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(6): 305-313.
  • Gibbons MM & McCarthy TK (1986) The reproductive output of frogs Rana temporaria (L.) with particular reference to body size and age. Journal of Zoology, 209(4): 579-593.
  • Halliday TR & Verrell PA (1988) Body size and age in amphibians and reptiles. Journal of Herpetology, 22(3): 253.
  • Hanna DEL, Wilson DR, Blouin-Demers G & Mennill DJ (2014) Spring peepers Pseudacris crucifer modify their call structure in response to noise. Current Zoology, 60(4): 438-448.
  • Heatwole H, Torres F, Blasini De Austin S & Heatwole A (1969) Studies on anuran water balance-I. dynamics of evaporative water loss by the coqui, Eleutherodactylus portoricensis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 28(1): 245-269.
  • Hu Y & Cardoso GC (2010) Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalisations in urban noise? Animal Behaviour, 79(4): 863-867.
  • Inger RF, Stuebing RB, Grafe TU & Dehling JM (2017) A Field Guide to the Frogs of Borneo. 3rd Edition. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, 228 pp.Junqua JC, Fincke S & Field K (1999) The Lombard effect: a reflex to better communicate with others in noise. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings, 4: 2083-2086.
  • Kaiser K & Hammers JL (2009) The effect of anthropogenic noise on male advertisement call rate in the neotropical treefrog , Dendropsophus triangulum. Behaviour, 146(8): 1053-1069.
  • Kaiser K, Scofield D, Alloush M, Jones R, Oliva M, Marczak S & Martineau K (2011) When sounds collide: the effect of anthropogenic noise on a breeding assemblage of frogs in Belize, Central America. Behaviour, 148(2): 215-232.
  • Lampe U, Schmoll T, Franzke A & Reinhold K (2012) Staying tuned: grasshoppers from noisy roadside habitats produce courtship signals with elevated frequency components. Functional Ecology, 26(6): 1348-1354.
  • Laurance WF, Goosem M & Laurance SGW (2009) Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(12): 659-669.
  • Lengagne T (2008) Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biological Conservation, 141(8): 2023-2031.
  • Love EK & Bee MA (2010) An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope's grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Animal Behaviour, 80(3): 509-515.
  • Marsh CW & Greer AG (1992) Forest land-use in Sabah, Malaysia: an introduction to Danum Valley. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 335(1275): 331-339.
  • Matsui M, Kawahara Y, Eto K, Hamidy A, Ahmad N & Hossman MYB (2018) Distinct species status of Kurixalus chaseni (Rhacophoridae, Anura) as revealed by mitochondrial phylogeny. Alytes, 36: 170-177.
  • McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T, Shepherd M & Pedersen SB (1992) The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Animal Behaviour, 43(6): 987-998.
  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. The American Naturalist, 109(965): 17-34.
  • Nemeth E & Brumm H (2009) Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? Animal Behaviour, 78(3): 637-641.
  • Nemeth E & Brumm H (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive? The American Naturalist, 176(4): 465-475.
  • Parris KM (2002) More bang for your buck: the effect of caller position, habitat and chorus noise on the efficiency of calling in the spring peeper. Ecological Modelling, 156(2-3): 213-224.
  • Parris KM, Velik-Lord M & North JMA (2009) Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecology and Society, 14(1): 25.
  • Popper AN & Hastings MC (2009) The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 75(3): 455-489.
  • Potvin DA, Parris KM & Mulder RA (2011) Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717): 2464-2469.
  • Quinn JL, Whittingham MJ, Butler SJ & Cresswell W (2006) Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology, 37(6): 601-608.
  • R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/. (Accessed 27 September 2017).Rabin LA, McCowan B, Hooper SL & Owins DH (2003) Anthropogenic noise and its effect on animal communication: an interface between comparative psychology and conservation biology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16: 172-192.
  • Reynolds G, Payne J, Sinun W, Mosigil G & Walsh RPD (2011) Changes in forest land use and management in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 1990-2010, with a focus on the Danum Valley region. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1582): 3168-3176.
  • Rheindt FE (2003) The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? Journal of Ornithology, 144(3): 295-306.
  • Rowley J, Brown R, Bain R, Kusrini M, Inger R, Stuart B, Wogan G, Thy N, Chan-ard T, Trung CT, Diesmos A, Iskandar DT, Lau M, Ming LT, Makchai S, Truong NQ & Phimmachak S (2010) Impending conservation crisis for Southeast Asian amphibians. Biology Letters, 6(3): 336-338.
  • Senzaki M, Yamaura Y, Francis CD & Nakamura F (2016) Traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in wild owls. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 30602.
  • Sheridan JA & Bickford D (2011) Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 1(8): 401-406.
  • Sheridan JA, Howard SD, Yambun P, Rice JL, Cadwallader-Staub R, Karoulus A & Bickford D (2012) Novel behaviours of Southeast Asian rhacophorid frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae) with an updated anuran species list for Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Tropical Natural History, 12(1): 1-8.
  • Shieh B-S, Liang S-H, Chen C-C, Loa H-H & Liao C-Y (2012) Acoustic adaptations to anthropogenic noise in the cicada Cryptotympana takasagona Kato (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). Acta Ethologica, 15(1): 33-38.
  • Simmons AM (2003) Perspectives and progress in animal acoustic communication. In: Simmons AM, Popper AN & Fay RR (eds.) Acoustic Communication. Springer, New York. Pp. 1-15.
  • Slabbekoorn H & Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424(6946): 267-267.
  • Sun JWC & Narins PM (2005) Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation, 121(3): 419-427.
  • Terhune JM, Stewart RE. & Ronald K (1979) Influence of vessel noises on underwater vocal activity of harp seals. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57(6): 1337-1338.
  • Voellmy IK, Purser J, Simpson SD & Radford AN (2014) Increased noise levels have different impacts on the anti-predator behaviour of two sympatric fish species. PLoS ONE, 9(7).
  • Wells KD & Schwartz JJ (2007) The behavioural ecology of anuran communication. In: Popper AN, Narins PM, Feng AS & Fay RR (eds.) Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians. Springer, New York. Pp. 44-86.
  • Whiles MR, Lips KR, Pringle CM, Kilham SS, Bixby RJ, Brenes R, Connelly S, Colon-gaud JC, Hunte-brown M, Huryn AD, Montgomery C & Peterson S (2006) The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(November 2015): 27-34.