Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published August 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Geometric morphometrics of mandibular shape in the dwarf fat-tailed jerboa: relevancy for trinomial taxonomy

Authors/Creators

Description

Kryštufek, Boris, Shenbrot, Georgy, Klenovšek, Tina, Janžekovič, Franc (2021): Geometric morphometrics of mandibular shape in the dwarf fat-tailed jerboa: relevancy for trinomial taxonomy. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 192 (4): 1363-1372, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa130, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/192/4/1363/5999191

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFA96D51FFA43A2CFF86FFEAC16BFFAD

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5302841 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5302843 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5302845 (DOI)

References

  • Baker RJ, Bradley RD. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 643-662.
  • Bannikova A, Lebedev V, Dubrovskaya A, Solovyeva E, Moskalenko V, Krystufek B, Hutterer R, Bykova E, Zhumabekova B, Rogovin K, Shenbrot G. 2019. Genetic evidence for several cryptic species within the Scarturus elater species complex (Rodentia: Dipodoidea): when cryptic species are really cryptic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 16-39.
  • Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Braby MF, Eastwood R, Murray N. 2012. The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 699-716.
  • Burbrink FT, Lawson R, Slowinski JB. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54: 2107-20118.
  • Cardini A, Jansson A-U, Elton S. 2007. A geometric morphometric approach to the study of ecogeographical and clinal variation in vervet monkeys. Journal of Biogeography 34: 1663-1678.
  • Casanovas-Vilar I, Van Dam J. 2013. Conservatism and adaptability during squirrel radiation: what is mandible shape telling us? PLoS One 8: e61298.
  • Caumul R, Polly PD. 2005. Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59: 2460-2472.
  • Cronin MA. 2006. A proposal to eliminate redundant terminology for intra species groups. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 237-241.
  • Cronin MA, Canovas A, Bannasch DL, Oberbauer AM, Medrano JF. 2015. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation of wolves (Canis lupus) in southeast Alaska and comparison with wolves, dogs, and coyotes in North America. Journal of Heredity 106: 26-36.
  • Dianat M, Darvish J, Aliabadian M, Siahsarvie R, Krystufek B, Nicolas V. 2020. Systematics and evolution of the Libyan jird based on molecular and morphometric data. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58: 439-458.
  • Ehrlich PR. 2000. Human natures: genes, cultures, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Exeter Software. 2008. NTSYSpc, numerical taxonomy system, v.2.2. Available at: https://ntsyspc.software.informer. com/2.2/
  • Good JM, Demboski JR, Nagorsen DW, Sullivan J. 2003. Phylogeography and introgressive hybridization: chipmunks (genus Tamias) in the northern Rocky Mountains. Evolution 57: 1900-1916.
  • Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM, Draheim HM, Dugger BD, Dunham SM, Elliott-Smith E, Fontaine JB, Kesler DC, Knaus BJ, Lopes IF, Loschl P, Mullins TD, Sheffield LM. 2006. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20: 1584-1594.
  • Hird A, Sullivan J. 2009. Assessment of gene flow across a hybrid zone in red-tailed chipmunks (Tamias ruficaudus). Molecular Ecology 18: 3097-3109.
  • Kassambara A, Mundt F. 2017. Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses (R package v.1.0.5). Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ factoextra/index.html (accessed 11 October 2019).
  • Klingenberg CP. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 353-357.
  • Krystufek B, Janzekovic F, Shenbrot G, Ivajnsic D, Klenovsek T. 2019. Phenotypic plasticity under desert environment constraints: mandible variation in the dwarf fat-tailed jerboa, Pygeretmus pumilio (Rodentia: Dipodidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 97: 940-951.
  • Landsborough Thomson A. 1969. The subspecies concept. Bird Study 16: 1-13.
  • Lanyon WE. 1982. The subspecies concept: then, now, and always. Auk 99: 603-604.
  • Lebedev VS, Bannikova AA, Lu L, Snytnikov EA, Adiya Y, Solovyeva EN, Abramov AV, Surov AV, Shenbrot GI. 2018. Phylogeographical study reveals high genetic diversity in a widespread desert rodent, Dipus sagitta (Dipodidae: Rodentia). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 123: 445-462.
  • Lemaitre JF, Ramm SA, Jennings N, Stockley P. 2012. Genital morphology linked to social status in the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 97-105.
  • Livingstone FB. 1962. On the non-existence of human races. Current Anthropology 3: 279-281.
  • Marr MM, Macleod N. 2019. Geographical variation in Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L., 1758) mandibles and the issue of subspecies level organization: a failure of history? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 337-359.
  • Mayr E. 1965. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Mayr E, Ashlock PD. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Miller EH. 2010. Genitalic traits of mammals: systematics and variation. In: Leonard JL, Cordoba-Aguilar A, eds. The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. New York: Oxford University Press, 471-493.
  • Milligan SR. 1979. The copulatory pattern of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and speculation on the role of penile spines. Journal of Zoology, London 188: 279-300.
  • Moore JC. 1959. Relationships among the living squirrels of the Sciurinae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 118: 153-206.
  • Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M. 2010. The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers of Zoology 7: 16.
  • Patten MA. 2010. Null expectations in subspecies diagnosis. Ornithological Monographs 67: 35-41.
  • Patton JL, Conroy CJ. 2017. The conundrum of subspecies: morphological diversity among desert populations of the California vole (Microtus californicus, Cricetidae). Journal of Mammalogy 98: 1010-1026.
  • Pellegrin P. 1986. Aristotle's classification of animals. Biology and the conceptual unity of the Aristotelian corpus. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.Rproject.org/
  • Ramm SA. 2007. Sexual selection and genital evolution in mammals: a phylogenetic analysis of baculum length. American Naturalist 169: 360-369.
  • Remsen JV. 2010. Subspecies as a meaningful taxonomic rank in avian classification. Ornithological Monographs 67: 62-78.
  • Renaud S, Rodrigues HG, Ledevin R, Pisanu B, Chapuis JL, Hardouin EA. 2015. Fast evolutionary response of house mice to anthropogenic disturbance on a sub-Antarctic island. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114: 513-526.
  • RohlfFJ.1999.Shapestatistics:Procrustessuperimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 1 6: 197-223.
  • Rohlf FJ. 2015. The tps series of software. Hystrix 26: 9-12.
  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
  • Schmidt E, Fauteux D, Therrien J-F, Gauthier G, Seyer Y. 2020. Improving diet assessment of Arctic terrestrial predators with the size of mandibles. Journal of Zoology 311: 23-32.
  • Shenbrot GI, Sokolov VE, Heptner VG, Kowalskaya YM. 1995. Mammals of Russia and adjacent regions. Jerboas and birchmice. Moscow: Nauka Press. [In Russian with English summary; translated into English in 2008 and published by Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, N.H.]
  • StatSoft Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), v.7. Available at: https://statistica.software.informer.com/
  • Stillwell RC. 2010. Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive? Oikos 119: 1387-1390.
  • Stockley P. 2002. Sperm competition risk and male genital anatomy: comparative evidence for reduced duration of female sexual receptivity in primates with penile spines. Evolutionary Ecology 16: 123-137.
  • Vinogradov BS. 1937. Fauna of USSR. Mammals, III/4, Dipodidae. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of USSR [in Russian].
  • Weckworth BV, Dawson NG, Talbot SL, Cook JA. 2015. Genetic distinctiveness of Alexander Archipelago wolves (Canis lupus ligoni): reply to Cronin et al. (2015). Journal of Heredity 106: 1-3.
  • Wheeler QD. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Biology 359: 571-583.
  • Wilson EO, Brown WL. 1953. The subspecies concept and its taxonomic application. Systematic Zoology 2: 97-111.
  • Wu JJ. 2012. Advances in k -means clustering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Zink RM. 2004. The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences 271: 561-564.