Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published June 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Larval chaetotaxy and morphology are highly homoplastic yet phylogenetically informative in Hydrobiusini water scavenger beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae)

Authors/Creators

Description

Archangelsky, Miguel, Martínez Román, Nicolás Rafael, Fikáček, Martin (2021): Larval chaetotaxy and morphology are highly homoplastic yet phylogenetically informative in Hydrobiusini water scavenger beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 192 (2): 416, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa050, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/192/2/416/6048374

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/5299597">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Cites
Publication: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa132 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541441 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF8289C37FCBBC22F3A732E31 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541443 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF8239C33FC65C1983C7E2C03 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541445 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF8259C2FFF05C1853FDF292A (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541447 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF83A9C2BFF70C63F3B7B2B5E (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541449 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF83F9C27FC6DC46C3AF52A50 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10541451 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF8339C26FCB5C5613CB12DB8 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5306279 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FE2D4AF8349C20FC1AC6E63ADE2F2F (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299599 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299601 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299603 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299605 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299607 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299609 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299611 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299613 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5318024 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299617 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5299619 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5318028 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5318032 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5318034 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5362536 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5318040 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/4e8bde44-3379-47ff-94ee-b5bdc99cc179 (URL)

References

  • Al Sayad S, Yassin A. 2019. Quantifying the extent of morphological homoplasy: a phylogenetic analysis of 490 characters in Drosophila. Evolution Letters 3: 286-298.
  • Alarie Y, Archangelsky M, Nilsson AN, Watts CHS. 2002. Larval morphology of genus Lancetes (Coleoptera: Adephaga: Dytiscidae): the hypothesis of sister-group relationships with the subfamily Dytiscinae revisited. Canadian Entomologist 134: 467-501.
  • Archangelsky M. 1997. Studies on the biology, ecology, and systematics of the immature stages of New World Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera: Staphyliniformia). Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey, New Series 12: 1-207.
  • Archangelsky M. 2000. Immature stages of Neotropical Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera): Hydramara argentina (Knisch, 1925) and Hemiosus bruchi Knisch, 1924. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 102: 280-291.
  • Archangelsky M. 2008. Phylogeny of the tribe Berosini (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilinae) based on larval and adult characters, and evolutionary scenarios related to habitat shift in larvae. Systematic Entomology 33: 635-650.
  • Archangelsky M. 2016. Chaetotaxy and larval morphometry of Cercyon praetextatus (Say) and C. quisquilius (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Sphaeridiinae) and their phylogenetic implications. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 74: 177-193.
  • Archangelsky M, Rodriguez G, Torres PLM. 2016. Primary chaetotaxy and larval morphometry of Phaenonotum ex str iat um a nd Da cty los ter num ca cti (C ole op ter a: Hydrophilidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 56: 167-193.
  • Ashe JS,Watrous LE. 1984. Larval chaetotaxy of Aleocharinae (Staphylinidae) based on a description of Atheta corticaria Kraatz. The Coleopterists Bulletin 38: 165-179.
  • Balfour-Browne WAF. 1910. On the life-history of Hydrobius fuscipes L. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 47: 317-340.
  • Berge Henegouwen AL. 1975. Description of the egg case and larva of Limnoxenus niger (Zschach) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Entomologische Berichten 35: 27-30.
  • Beutel RG. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of Adephaga (Coleoptera) based on characters of the larval head. Systematic Entomology 18: 127-147.
  • Beutel RG, Haas F. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the suborders of Coleoptera (Insecta). Cladistics 16: 103-141.
  • Beutel RG, Pollock DA. 2000. Larval head morphology of Phycosecis litoralis (Pascoe) (Coleoptera: Phycosecidae) with phylogenetic implications. Invertebrate Taxonomy 14: 825-835.
  • Beutel RG, Maddison DR, Haas A. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Myxophaga (Coleoptera) using larval characters. Systematic Entomology 24: 171-192.
  • Beutel RG, Friedrich F, Hornschemeyer H, Pohl H, Hunefeld F, Beckmann F,Meier R, Misof B,Whiting MF, Vilhelmsen L. 2011. Morphological and molecular evidence converge upon a robust phylogeny of the megadiverse Holometabola. Cladistics 27: 341-355.
  • Bousquet Y, Goulet H. 1984. Notation of primary setae and pores on larvae of Carabidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 573-588.
  • Boving AG, Henriksen KL. 1938. The developmental stages of the Danish Hydrophilidae. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 102: 27-162.
  • Byttebier B, Torres PLM. 2009. Description of the preimaginal stages of Enochrus (Hugoscottia) variegatus (Steinheil, 1869) and E. (Methydrus) vulgaris (Steinheil, 1869) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with emphasis on larval morphometry and chaetotaxy. Zootaxa 2139: 1-22.
  • Cranston PS, Edward D. 1998. Afrochlus Freeman:an African Gondwanan midge and the phylogeny of the Podonominae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Systematic Entomology 23: 77-90.
  • Crowson RA. 1955. The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. London: Nathaniel Lloyd.
  • Cussac E. 1856. Notice concernant les metamorphoses du Ceutorhynchus rhaphani et du Mycetochares linearis et remarques sur les moeurs de l' Hydrobius fuscipes. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 3: 241-248.
  • Fikacek M. 2006. Primary chaetotaxy of the larval head of the hydrophiloid beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea). Master's Thesis, Charles University in Prague.
  • Fikacek M, Archangelsky M, Torres PLM. 2008. Primary chaetotaxy of the larval head capsule and head appendages of the Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) based on larva of Hydrobius fuscipes (Linnaeus, 1758). Zootaxa 1874: 16-34.
  • Fikacek M, Gustafson GT, Short AEZ. 2017. On wet rocks with snorkels: immature stages of Tritonus cascade beetles with unusual modification of spiracles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Laccobiini). Annales Zoologici 67: 91-107.
  • Fikacek M, Minoshima YN, Jach MA. 2018. Larval morphology of Yateberosus, a New Caledonian endemic subgenus of Laccobius (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with notes on 'Berosus -like' larvae in Hydrophiloidea. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58: 195-206.
  • Fikacek M, Beutel RG, Cai C, Lawrence JF, Newton AF, Solodovnikov A, Slipinski A, Thayer MK, Yamamoto S. 2020. Reliable placement of beetle fossils via phylogenetic analyses - Triassic Leehermania as a case study (Staphylinidae or Myxophaga?). Systematic Entomology 45: 175-187.
  • Goloboff PA, Catalano SA. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32: 221-238.
  • Grebennikov VV, Maddison DR. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Trechitae (Coleoptera: Carabidae) based on larval morphology, with a description of first instar Phrypeus and key to genera. Systematic Entomology 30: 38-59.
  • Hadley A. 2010. CombineZP. Available at: https://combinezp. software.informer.com
  • Hansen M. 1999. World catalogue of insects 2: Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera). Stenstrup: Apollo Books.
  • Jia FL, Zhao S. 2013. Taxonomic notes on Chinese Ametor and Hydrocassis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Sperchopsini). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 53: 127-139.
  • Kovarik PW, Passoa S. 1993. Chaetotaxy of larval Histeridae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) based on a description of Onthophilus nodatus LeConte. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86: 560-576.
  • Kristensen NP. 1999. Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms. European Journal of Entomology 96: 237-253.
  • Lawrence JF, Newton AF. 1982. Evolution and classification of beetles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 261-290.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2019. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.61. Available at: http://www.mesquiteproject.org
  • Makarov KV. 1996. Patterns of chaetome modifications in ground-beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 60: 391-413.
  • Meier R, Lim GS. 2009. Conflict, convergent evolution and the relative importance of immature and adult characters in endopterygote phylogenetics. Annual Review of Entomology 54: 85-104.
  • Michat MC, Alarie Y, Miller KB. 2017. Higher-level phylogeny of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) based on larval characters. Systematic Entomology 42: 734-767.
  • Minoshima Y, Hayashi M. 2011a. Larval morphology of the Japanese species of the tribes Acidocerini, Hydrobiusini and Hydrophilini (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae).Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 51: 1-118.
  • Minoshima Y, Hayashi M. 2011b. Larval morphology of the genus Hydrocassis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Journal of Natural History 45: 2757-2784.
  • Minoshima Y, Hayashi M. 2012. The first instar larva of Hydrobius pauper Sharp (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Elytra, New Series 2: 279-284.
  • Minoshima Y, Hayashi M. 2015. Description of the larval stages of the berosine genera Berosus and Regimbartia based on the Japanese species B. japonicus and R. attenuata (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 55: 47-83.
  • Perkins PD. 1972 . A study of the Hydraenidae and Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) of the San Gabriel River, with emphasis in larval taxonomy. Master's Thesis, California State University.
  • Pietrykowska-Tudruj E , Staniec B , Wojas T , Solodovnikov A. 2014. Immature stages and phylogenetic importance of Astrapeus, a rove beetle genus of puzzling systematic position (Coleoptera,Staphylinidae,Staphylinini). Contributions to Zoology 83: 41-65.
  • Richmond EA. 1920. Studies on the biology of aquatic Hydrophilidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 42: 1-94.
  • Rodriguez G, Archangelsky M, Torres PLM. 2015. Description of immatures of Berosus decolor Knisch, 1924, with emphasis on the chaetotaxy and morphometry. Zootaxa 3981: 577-591.
  • Rodriguez G, Archangelsky M, Michat MC, Torres PLM. 2018. Comparative analysis of diagnostic and phylogenetic chaetotaxic characters of Berosus Leach and their implications on the relationships of the tribe Berosini (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 277: 203-217.
  • Rodriguez G, Fikacek M, Yoshitomi YN, Archangelsky M, Torres PLM. 2020. Going underwater: multiple origins and functional morphology of piercing-sucking feeding and tracheal system adaptations in water scavenger beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa132
  • Schiodte JC. 1862. De metamorphosi eletheratorum observations. Bidrag til insekternes udviklingshistorie. Pars I. Gyrini, Hydrophili, Silphae. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift 1: 193-232.
  • Schiodte JC. 1872. De metamorphosi eletheratorum observations. Bidrag til insekternes udviklingshistorie. Pars VI. Carabi (Suppl.), Dytisci (Suppl.), Hydrophili (Suppl.). Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift 8: 165-226.
  • Schodl S, Ji L. 1995. Hydrophilidae: 2. Synopsis of Hydrocassis Deyrolle & Fairmaire and Ametor Semenov, with description of three new species (Coleoptera). In: Jach MA, Ji L, eds. Water beetles of China, vol. 1. Vienna: Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft in Osterreich / Wiener Coleopterologenverein, 221-243.
  • Seidel M, Minoshima YN, Arriagada-Varela E, Fikacek M. 2018. Breaking a disjunct distribution: a review of the southern hemisphere genera Cylorygmus and Relictorygmus gen. nov. (Hydrophilidae: Cylominae). Annales Zoologici 68: 375-402.
  • Short AEZ, Fikacek M. 2011. World catalogue of the Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera): additions and corrections II (2006-2010). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 51: 83-122.
  • Short AEZ, Fikacek M. 2013. Molecular phylogeny, evolution and classification of the Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera). Systematic Entomology 38: 723-752.
  • Short AEZ, Liebherr JK. 2007. Systematics and biology of the endemic water scavenger beetles of Hawaii (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Systematic Entomology 32: 601-624.
  • Short AEZ, Cole J, Toussaint EFA. 2017. Phylogeny, classification and evolution of the water scavenger beetle tribe Hydrobiusini inferred from morphology and molecules (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Hydrophilinae). Systematic Entomology 42: 677-691.
  • Sipek P, Fabrizi S, Eberle J, Ahrens D. 2011. A molecular phylogeny of rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) reveals a complex and concerted morphological evolution related to their flight mode.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 101: 163-175.
  • Solodovnikov AY. 2007. Larval chaetotaxy of Coleoptera (Insecta) as a tool for evolutionary research and systematics: less confusion, more clarity. Zoological Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary Research 45: 120-127.
  • Spangler PJ. 1961. Notes on the biology and distribution of Sperchopsis tessellatus (Ziegler), (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 15: 105-112.
  • Spangler PJ. 1962. Description of the larva and pupa of Ametor scabrosus (Horn), (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 16: 15-19.
  • Spangler PJ. 1979. Hydramara argentina, a description of its larva and a report on its distribution (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 81: 536-543.
  • Thayer MK. 2000. Glypholoma larvae at last: phylogenetic implications for basal Staphylinidae ? (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Glypholomatinae). Invertebrate Taxonomy 14: 741-754.
  • Torres PLM, Michat MC, Archangelsky M. 2011. The immature stages of Tropisternus (Pleurhomus) sahlbergi (Sharp) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with considerations on the preimaginal morphology and primary chaetotaxy of the subtribe Hydrophilina. Zootaxa 2777: 25-40.
  • Torres PLM , Michat MC , Archangelsky M , Fernandez LA. 2014. Description of immatures of the genus Tropisternus Solier, subgenus Pristoternus Orchymont (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with emphasis on the chaetotaxy and morphometry of larval forms. Zootaxa 3790: 380-398.
  • Toussaint EFA, Fikacek M, Short AEZ. 2016. India- Madagascar vicariance explains cascade beetle biogeography. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 118: 982-991.
  • Toussaint EFA, Short AEZ. 2018. Transoceanic steppingstones between Cretaceous waterfalls? The enigmatic biogeography of pantropical Oocyclus cascade beetles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127: 416-428.
  • Van Emden FI. 1956. The Georyssus larva - a hydrophilid. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society,London 31: 20-24.
  • Van Tassell RE. 1966. Taxonomy and biology of the subfamily Berosinae of North and Central America and the West Indies. Ph.D. Thesis, The Catholic University of America.
  • Watts CHS. 2002. The larvae of some Australian aquatic Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera: Insecta). Records of the South Australian Museum 35: 105-138.
  • Wesenberg-Lund C. 1913. Fortpflanzungsverhaltnisse: Paarung und Eiablage der Susswasserinsekten. Fortschritte der Naturwissenschaftlichen Forschung 8: 161-286.
  • Wiley EO. 1981. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Williams FX. 1936. Biological studies in Hawaiian waterloving insects, part I Coleoptera or beetles, part II Odonata or dragonflies. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 9: 235-249.