Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published December 2, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Do male tree frogs feed during the breeding season? Stomach flushing of five syntopic hylid species in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Authors/Creators

Description

Solé, Mirco, Pelz, Birgit (2007): Do male tree frogs feed during the breeding season? Stomach flushing of five syntopic hylid species in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Natural History 41 (41-44): 2757-2763, DOI: 10.1080/00222930701661282, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701661282

Files

source.pdf

Files (251.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:429aa2e02a865624d757eefd16d135b9
251.9 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF9AFFE0FF865624D757FFFDFFD1FFB9

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5233521 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5233523 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5233525 (DOI)

References

  • Anderson AM, Haukos DA, Anderson JT. 1999. Diet composition of three anurans from the Playa Wetlands of Northwest Texas. Copeia 1999:515-520.
  • Brandao RA, Garda A, Braz V, Fonseca B. 2003. Observations on the ecology of Pseudis bolbodactyla (Anura, Pseudidae) in central Brazil. Phyllomedusa 2(1):3-8.
  • Di-Bernardo M, Oliveira RB, Pontes GMF, Melchiors J, Sole M, Kwet A. 2004. Anfibios anuros da regiao de extracao e processamentos de carvao de Candiota, RS, Brasil. In: Teixeira EC, editor. Estudos Ambientais em Candiota: Carvao e seus impactos. (Brazil): FINEP/PDACT/CIAMB/FAPERGS/FEPAM. p 163-175.
  • Donnelly MA, Guyer C. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia 98:291-302.
  • Engels W, Hampp R, Tzschupke W. 2002. BMBF Project Araucaria forest. Reforestation of a highly endangered subtropical rainforest ecosystem, originally covering large areas of the Southern Mata Atlantica. Pro- Araucaria online. http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/entw-phys/CD/Evaluation.pdf.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55:207-217.
  • Haddad CFB, Sawaya RJ. 2000. Reproductive modes of Atlantic forest hylid frogs: a general overview and the description of a new mode. Biotropica 32:862-871.
  • Heinle S. 2002. Schlussbericht uber die 1. Phase des Forschungsprojektes Araukarienwald. Pro-Araucaria online. http://www.stz-rottenburg.de/easylit/modul15/html/schlussbericht.html.
  • Kime NM, Turner WR, Ryan MJ. 2000. The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behavioral Biology 11:71-83.
  • Korschgen LJ, Moyle DL. 1955. Food habits of the bullfrog in central Missouri farm ponds. American Midland Naturalist 54:332-341.
  • Kwet A. 2001. Frosche im brasilianischen Araukarienwald: Anurengemeinschaft des Araukarienwaldes von Rio Grande do Sul: Diversitat, Reproduktion und Ressourcenaufteilung. Munster: Natur und Tier-Verlag.
  • Kwet A. 2004. Frosche im brasilianischen Araukarienwald. Biologie in Unserer Zeit 34:170-178.
  • Kwet A, Di-Bernardo M. 1999. Pro-Mata-Anfibios, Amphibien, Amphibians. Porto Alegre (Brazil): EDIPUCRS.
  • Lahanas PN. 1995. The function of near neighbors in decreasing call latency period by the Tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Biotropica 27:262-265.
  • Maneyro R, da Rosa I. 2004. Temporal and spatial changes in the diet of Hyla pulchella (Anura, Hylidae) in southern Uruguay. Phyllomedusa 3:101-113.
  • Maneyro R, Naya DE, da Rosa I, Canavero A, Camargo A. 2004. Diet of the South American frog Leptodactylus ocellatus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in Uruguay. Iheringia, Serie Zoologia 94:57-61.
  • Martins M. 1993. Observations on the reproductive behaviour in the Smith Frog, Hyla faber. Herpetological Journal 3:31-34.
  • Melchiors J, Di-Bernardo M, Pontes GMF, Oliveira RB, Sole M, Kwet A. 2004. Reproducao de Pseudis minuta (Anura, Hylidae) no sul do Brasil. Phyllomedusa 3:61-68.
  • Regosin JV, Windmiller BS, Homan RN, Reed M. 2005. Variation in terrestrial use by four pool-breeding amphibian species. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:1481-1493.
  • Richter SC, Young JE, Seigel RA, Johnson GN. 2001. Postbreeding movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Herpetology 35:316-321.
  • Ryan MJ. 1985. The Tungara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Taft LK. 1981. The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8:273-278.
  • Sole M, Beckmann O, Pelz B, Kwet A, Engels W. 2005. Stomach-flushing for diet analysis in anurans: an improved protocol evaluated in a case study in Araucaria forests, southern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 40:23-28.
  • Sole M, Ketterl J, Di-Bernardo M, Kwet A. 2002. Ants and termites are the diet of the microhylid frog Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799) at an Araucaria forest in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Herpetological Bulletin 79:14-17.
  • Toledo LF, Haddad CFB. 2005. Reproductive biology of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 39:3029-3037.
  • Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF. 2005. Borror and Delong's introduction to the study of insects. 7th ed. Belmont (CA): Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  • Van Sluys M, Rocha CFD, Souza MB. 2001. Diet, reproduction, and density of the leptodactylid litter frog Zachaenus parvulus in an Atlantic rain forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 35:322-325.
  • Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC. 2005. Diversidade, distribuicao espacial e temporal de anfibios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5:137-150.
  • Wells KD, Taigen TL. 1986. The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19:9-18.
  • Zina J, Haddad CFB. 2005. Reproductive activity and vocalization of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 5:119-129.