Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published April 19, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Biogeographic regions of Central Argentina based on snake distribution: evaluating two different methodological approaches

Description

Nori, Javier, Díaz Gómez, Juan M., Leynaud, Gerardo C. (2011): Biogeographic regions of Central Argentina based on snake distribution: evaluating two different methodological approaches. Journal of Natural History 45 (17-18): 1005-1020, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2010.547623, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2010.547623

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:5626FFFC281BFFFFFF8AFFFDE45D541E

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5203566 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5203569 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5203571 (DOI)

References

  • Aegesen L, Szumik CA, Zuloaga FO, Morrone O. 2009. Quantitative biogeography in the South America highlands-recognizing the Altoandina, Puna and Prepuna through the study of Poaceae. Cladistics. 25:1-16.
  • Acosta LE. 1991. Escorpiones y Opiliones de la provincia de Cordoba (Argentina): diversidad y zoogeografia. Bull Soc neuchatel Sci Nat. 116:11-17.
  • Arzamendia V, Giraudo AR. 2002. Lista y distribucion de los ofidios (Reptilia: Serpentes) de Santa Fe, Argentina. Cuadernos Herpetol. 16(1):15-32.
  • Arzamendia V, Giraudo AR. 2004. Usando patrones de biodiversidad para la evaluacion y diseno de areas protegidas: las serpientes de la provincia de Santa Fe(Argentina) como ejemplo. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 77(2):335-348.
  • Cabido M, Funes G, Pucheta E, Vendramini F, Diaz S. 1998. A chorological analysis of the mountains from central Argentina: is all what we call Sierra Chaco really Chaco? Contribution to the study of the flora and vegetation of the Chaco XII. Candollea 53:321-331.
  • Cabrera AL .1976. Regiones fitogeograficas Argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardineria. 2nd ed. Buenos Aires (Argentina): ACME.
  • Cabrera MR. 2001. Composicion comparativa de la fauna de serpientes (Reptilia, Squamata) de cuatro provincias biogeograficas del Dominio Chaqueno. Rev Mus Argent Cienc Nat. 3(2):109-118.
  • Carine MA, Humphries CJ, Guma IR, Reyes-Betancort JA, Guerra AS. 2009. Areas and algorithms: evaluating numerical approaches for the delimitation of areas of endemism in the Canary Islands archipelago. J Biogeogr. 36(4):596-611.
  • Capitanelli R. 1979. Geografia Fisica de la Provincia de Cordoba. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Boldt. Chapter 5. Geomorfologia. p. 213-297.
  • Cei JM. 1986. Reptiles del centro, centro-oeste y sur de la Argentina. Herpetofauna de las zonas aridas y semiaridas. 2nd ed. Torino (Italy): Museo regionale di Scienze Naturali.
  • De Queiroz K, Good DA. 1997. Phenetic clustering in biology: a critique. Q Rev Biol. 72(1): 3-30.
  • Diaz Gomez J. 2007. Endemism in Liolaemus (lguaria: Liolaemidae) from the Argentinian Puna. S Am J Herpetol. 2:59-68.
  • Di Fonzo A, Bucher EH. 1981. La fauna de serpientes de la provincia de Cordoba, Argentina. Ecosur. 8:89-98.
  • Di Fonzo A, Bucher EH. 1983. La fauna de serpientes de la provincia de Cordoba, Argentina. II. Comunidades asociadas a las formaciones Vegetales. Ecosur. 10:19-35.
  • Dominguez MC, Roig-Junent S, Tassin JJ, Ocampo FC, Flores GE. 2006. Areas of endemism of the Patagonian steppe: an approach based on insect distributional patterns using endemicity analysis. J Biogeogr. 33:1527-1537.
  • Escalante T, Sanchez-Cordero V, Morrone JJ, Linaje M. 2007. Deforestation affects biogeographical regionalization: a case study contrasting potential and extant distributions of Mexican terrestrial mammals. J Nat Hist. 41(13):965-984.
  • Farris JS. 1981. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis in Advances in Cladistics. presented at first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.
  • Fox NJ, Beckley LE. 2005. Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: a comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biol Conserv. 125:399-410.
  • Fuller T, Sanchez-Cordero V, Illoldi-Rangel P, Linaje M, Sarkar S. 2007. The cost of postponing biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 134:593-600.
  • Giraudo AR. 2001. Diversidad de serpientes de la selva Paranaense y del Chaco Humedo: Taxonomia, biogeografia y conservacion. Buenos Aires (Argentina): LOLA (Literature of Latin America).
  • Giraudo AR, Scrocchi GJ. 2002 Argentinean snakes: a commented checklist. Washington DC (USA): Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service.
  • InfoStat statistical programme: InfoStat Group . INFOSTAT statistical programme: InfoStat Group, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Cordoba, Argentina; [cited 15 June 2010]. Available from: www.infostat.com.ar.
  • IUCN Red List Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2006) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
  • Jackson, DA, Harvey HH. 1989. Biogeographic associations in fish assemblages: local vs. regional processes. Ecology 70(5):1472-1484.
  • Jain, N C, Lajpat LR. 1986. Pattern recognition. Vol. 19. No. I, p. 95-99.
  • Jenness J. 2004. Convex hulls around points (conv_hulls_pts.avx) extension for ARCVIEW 3.x [Internet]: Jenness Eterprises; [cited 18 June 2010]. Avaliable from http://www.jennessent.com.
  • Jenness J. 2005. Repeating shapes (repeat_shapes. avx) extension for ArcView 3.x [Internet]: Jenness Enterprises; [cited 18 June 2010]. Avaliable from: http://www.jennessent.com.
  • Leynaud G, Bucher EH. 1999. La fauna de serpientes del Chaco Sudamericano: diversidad, distribucion geografica y estado de conservacion. Acad Nacl Cienc (Cordoba, Argentina) Miscel. 98:1-46.
  • Lizarralde M, Szumik C. 2007. Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Pelinoides Cresson (Diptera-Ephydridae). Zootaxa. 1510:35-50.
  • Lopez HL, Menni RC, Donato M, Miquelarena AM. 2008. Biogeographical revision of Argentina (Andean and Neotropical Regions): an analysis using freshwater fishes. J Biogeogr. 35(9):1564-1579.
  • Luti R, Bertran M., Galera F, Muller N, Berzal M, Nores M, Herrera M, Barrera J. 1979 Geografia Fisica de la Provincia de Cordoba. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Boldt. Chapter 6. Vegetacion. p. 268-297.
  • Margules CR, Sarkar S. 2007. Systematic conservation planning. 1st ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  • Morrone JJ. 2006. Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistic analyses of the entomofauna. Annu Rev Entomol. 51:467-494.
  • Moline PM, Linder HP. 2006. Input data, analytical methods and biogeography of Elegia (Restionaceae). J Biogeogr. 33:47-62.
  • Nores M. 1987. Guia para la identificacion de las aves de Argentina y Uruguay. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vazques Mazzini (Eds). Zonas ornitogeograficas de Argentina. p. 295-305.
  • Orloci, L. 1967. An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J Ecol. 55:193-206.
  • Pressey RL. 1995. Conservation reserves in NSW. Crown jewels or leftovers? Search 26(2): 47-51.
  • Sanchez-Cordero V, Illoldi-Rangel P, Linaje M, Sarkar S, Peterson AT. 2005. Deforestation and extant distributions of Mexican endemic mammals. Biol Conserv. 126:465-473.
  • Scrocchi GJ, Aguer I, Arzamendia V, Cacivio P, Carcacha H, Chiaraviglio M, Giraudo A, Kretzschmar S, Leynaud G, Lopez MS, et al. 2000. Categorizacion de los Anfibios y Reptiles de la Republica Argentina. Buenos Aires (Argentina): E. Lavilla E. Richard, G. Scrocchi (Eds). Categorizacion de las serpientes de Argentina. p. 75-93.
  • Szumik CA, Cuezzo F, Goloboff PA, Chalup A. 2002. An optimality criterion to determin areas of endemism. Syst Biol. 51:806-816.
  • Szumik CA, Goloboff PA. 2004. Areas of endemism: an improved optimality criterion. Syst Biol. 53:973-980.
  • Szumik CA, Roig-Junent S. 2005. Regionalizacion biogeografica en Iberoamerica y topicos afines. Mexico D.F. (Mexico): J.J. Morrone, J. Llorente Bousquets (Eds). Criterio de optimalidad para areas de endemismo: El caso de America del Sur Austral. p. 495-508.
  • Turpie JK, Beckley LE, Katua SM. 2000. Biogeography and the selection of priority areas for conservation of South African coastal fishes. Biol Cons. 92:59-72.
  • Zak MR, Cabido M, Caceres D, Diaz S. 2008. What drives accelerated land cover change in Central Argentina? Synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic, and technological factors. Environ Manag. 42:181-189.