Published June 26, 2021 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Medical Students' Perceptions of a Curricular Shift at a South African University: from problem-based learning to modified case-based learning

  • 1. University of Witwatersrand
  • 2. University of British Columbia

Description

Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) are two widely used pedagogical approaches to small-group learning (SGL) in medical education. They offer comparable learner benefits; however, the implementation of these approaches vary considerably, resulting in institution-specific educational outcomes and learner experiences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the delivery of these two teaching methods at a single university in South Africa in the context of a curriculum shift in response to local pedagogical needs and resource constraints.

 

Method: Medical Students at the University of the Witwatersrand were surveyed in their final year of the curriculum (MBBCh Year 6) regarding their experiences of both PBL and modified-CBL (mCBL) during their preclinical years (MBBCh Year 3 and Year 4 respectively). A total of 322 students were invited to complete a questionnaire designed to identify their educational background (whether graduate entry or high-school leaver) and their perceptions of PBL in comparison to mCBL as well as potential improvements to both pedagogies.

 

Results: There was no significant difference between students who preferred PBL (n=63, 34.1%), mCBL (n=64, 34.6%), or ‘neither’ (n=58, 31.4%) mode of study (P = 0.449). Where students found that the respective learning method prepared them for clinical practice, they were more than twice as likely to select that method over neither option (PBL OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.6-6.8 P=0.001) (mCBL OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.2-4.5 P=0.014). Furthermore, the majority of the students agreed that the background and expertise of facilitators were important to their learning experiences. For both PBL and mCBL, 79% of students preferred clinician facilitators and facilitators who were content experts (PBL - 77% and mCBL - 81%).

 

Conclusions: Medical students who experienced a curricular transition between two SGL methods did not prefer either teaching method over the other. This study highlights the need for institutions to explore and address context-specific challenges and expectations around SGL implementation both before and after adopting any curricular change.

 

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

Contact author - Dataset available upon reasonable request

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here