Published April 23, 2019 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Agricultural pastures challenge the attractiveness of natural saltmarsh for a migratory goose

  • 1. Cornell University
  • 2. University of Groningen
  • 3. University of Amsterdam
  • 4. Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie

Description

1. Broad-scale land conversions and fertilizer use have dramatically altered the available staging area for herbivorous long-distance migrants. Instead of natural land, these birds rely increasingly on pastures for migratory fuelling and stopover, often conflicting with farming practices. To be able to predict and manage birds' future habitat use, the relative advantages and disadvantages of natural (e.g. saltmarsh, intertidal) versus anthropogenic staging sites for foraging need to be understood. 2. We compared the migratory staging of brent geese on saltmarsh and pasture sites in spring. Food quality (nitrogen and fibre content), intra-specific antagonistic behaviour, and body weight were quantified at nearby sites in simultaneous seasons. Individuals were tracked with high-resolution GPS and accelerometers to compare timing of migration and time-budgets during fuelling. 3. On pastures, birds rested more and experienced higher ingestion rates, similar or superior food quality and reduced antagonistic interactions than on saltmarsh. 4. Brent geese using fertilized grasslands advanced their fuelling and migration schedules compared to those using saltmarsh. Pasture birds reached heavy weights earlier, departed sooner, and arrived in the Arctic earlier. 5. Intertidal mudflats were frequently visited by saltmarsh birds during the day, and available food there (algae, some seagrass) was of higher quality than terrestrial resources. Availability of intertidal resources was an important factor balancing the otherwise more favourable conditions on pastures relative to saltmarsh. 6. Policy implications: Disadvantages of longer foraging effort, more antagonistic interactions and delayed fuelling schedules on traditional saltmarshes may cause a trend of geese exchanging this traditional niche in favour of pastures, especially in a warming climate that requires advancement of migratory schedules. However, the high quality of intertidal forage allows it to complement terrestrial foraging, potentially removing the incentive for habitat switches to pastures. The relatively high quality of green algae and seagrass, and birds' remarkable preference for these resources when available, provides a key for managers to create landscapes that can sustain this specialist's intertidal lifestyle. To keep natural habitats attractive to staging geese with the purpose to prevent conflicts with farming practices, management actions should focus on conservation and restoration of saltmarsh and especially intertidal habitat.

Notes

Files

behavioural_observations_schiermonnikoog.csv

Files (24.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c9f10c174ea6557f3bf0d1350d44c0f3
12.0 kB Preview Download
md5:78d0fabf784da50c5b6ee6f94c9b96ba
2.4 kB Preview Download
md5:66c565e14cf2988cd63c992b379fdfe3
13.0 MB Preview Download
md5:10e214e108ef13533f89262e6ce6649c
11.0 MB Preview Download
md5:0bae4652f4593b1de736b3ee3a6ee38e
2.6 kB Preview Download
md5:97ac92b9a5a1552fcdedd25fef1d4e4a
25.9 kB Preview Download
md5:bcec782d5ec8f4972a69a291fc179a08
1.3 kB Preview Download
md5:830bb19c9b2360d755ea40971de04276
452 Bytes Preview Download
md5:1e73217112f7ff376b4f70534bf9b781
2.1 kB Preview Download
md5:c81b8cdfe4fcb0b3968e042412c1bca8
3.0 kB Preview Download
md5:af832c4d210c4fc52d5c43a9197b5c7c
719 Bytes Preview Download
md5:d4f3a2bbc2cd50e7ee554d0e7365f4aa
1.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/1365-2664.13168 (DOI)
Is supplemented by
10.5061/dryad.6b55m22 (DOI)