Published March 21, 2012 | Version v1

Data from: Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency

  • 1. University of Colorado Boulder
  • 2. Fort Lewis College

Description

BACKGROUND: Human-generated noise pollution now permeates natural habitats worldwide, presenting evolutionarily novel acoustic conditions unprecedented to most landscapes. These acoustics are not only harmful to humans, but threaten wildlife, and especially birds, via changes to species densities, foraging behavior, reproductive success, and predator-prey interactions. Explanations for the negative effects of noise on birds include the disruption of acoustic communication through energetic masking, potentially forcing species that rely upon acoustic communication to abandon otherwise suitable areas. However, this hypothesis has not been adequately tested because confounding stimuli often co-vary with noise and are difficult to separate from noise exposure. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using a natural experiment that controls for confounding stimuli, we evaluate whether species vocal features or urban-tolerance classification explain their responses to noise measured through habitat use. Two data sets representing nesting and abundance responses reveal that noise filters bird communities nonrandomly. Signal duration and urban tolerance failed to explain species-specific responses, but birds with low-frequency signals that are more susceptible to masking from noise avoided noisy areas and birds with higher pitched vocalizations remained. Signal frequency was also negatively correlated with body mass, suggesting that larger birds may be more sensitive to noise due to the link between body size and vocal frequency. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that acoustic masking by noise may be a strong selective force shaping the ecology of birds worldwide. Larger birds with lower frequency signals may be excluded from noisy habitat, whereas smaller species persist via transmission of higher pitched signals. We discuss our findings as they relate to interspecific relationships among body size, vocal amplitude and frequency and suggest that they are immediately relevant to the global problem of increases in noise by providing critical insight as to which species traits influence tolerance of these novel acoustics.

Notes

Files

Audio1_Compressor100m.wav

Files (7.3 MB)

Name Size
md5:acf22363330494673ebd4d1d323539db
2.2 MB Preview Download
md5:062b7c540a43288f55504f0ba486ab3d
2.0 MB Preview Download
md5:f36e03fa691fb93251c0eb87d0a34079
74.6 kB Preview Download
md5:a8407ce5e4c7558da765fb02f22dd9ce
253.9 kB Preview Download
md5:df10eb71f0ee97033bebf7fab25e54c0
447.9 kB Preview Download
md5:9b0e2cc4ffe5c346509965844547a345
444.3 kB Preview Download
md5:95fa5b53736ce4b9d5289e8724193a75
1.1 MB Preview Download
md5:3a2692eab09cedaeec49a0843a499da0
291.0 kB Preview Download
md5:8d3233fd626ba00d043153f2b2942f44
541.8 kB Preview Download
md5:22354015e35648989bf0a91e2caa9fc3
5.3 kB Preview Download
md5:f6713dffca016e6e70cf39ddb3f27d83
3.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works