Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published May 24, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

The concept of genus within the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Parasitiformes): historical review and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Neoseiulus Hughes

Authors/Creators

Description

Tsolakis, Haralabos, Tixier, Marie Stephane, Kreiter, Serge, Ragusa, Salvatore (2012): The concept of genus within the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Parasitiformes): historical review and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Neoseiulus Hughes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (2): 253-273, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00809.x, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00809.x

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/4720240">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:757D3758244CE87EFFA1F016FF961375
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/757D3758244CE87EFFA1F016FF961375

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/89444F202448E87BFC16F183FDE91295 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720244 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720246 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720248 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720250 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720254 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720256 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720258 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.4720260 (DOI)

References

  • Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255-266.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1957. Typhlodromus ornatus n.sp. et Typhlodromus longilaterus n.sp. (Acarina, Phytoseiidae) Mesostigmates predateurs d'Algerie. Revue de Pathologie Vegetale et Entomologie Agricole de France 36: 215-222.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1958. Contribution a la connaissance du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten. (Acariens Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Description de deux especes nouvelles d'Algerie et cle des especes du groupe finlandicus. Revue de Pathologie Vegetale et Entomologie Agricole de France 37: 181-186.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1960a. Nouveaux Amblyseius d'Algerie (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 2: 287-299.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1960b. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Algerie. IV. Genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857. Bulletin de la Societe d'Histoire Naturelle d'Afrique du Nord 51: 62-107.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1962. Amblyseius swirskii, un nouveau Phytoseiidae voisin d' A. andersoni (Acariens anactinotriches). Annales de l'Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture d'Alger 3: 1-7.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1966. Contribution a l'etude des Amblyseius palearctiques (Acariens anactinotriches, Phytoseiidae). Bulletin Scientifique de Bourgogne 24: 182-230.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1967. L'appareil d'insemination Laelapoide. Remarques preliminaires sur la possibilite d'emploi a des fins taxonomiques (Acariens anactinotriches, Laelapoidea). Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Acarology: 191-193.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1968. L'appareil d'insemination Laelapoide (Acariens anactinotriches: Laelapoidea). Premieres observations, possibilites d'emploi a des fins taxonomiques. Bulletin Scientique de Bourgogne 25: 230-274.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1971. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini (Gamasides Podospermiques, Phytoseiidae). I. La depilation des genuaux et tibias des pattes. Acarologia 13: 4-15.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1975. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. II - Le releve organotaxique de la face dorsale adulte (Gamasides Protoadeniques, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 17: 20-29.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1977. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. III. Sur le genre Cydnodromus: redefinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 22: 61-73.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1978. Definition de Dictyonotus nov. gen., avec description de deux especes nouvelles de France meridionale (Gamasides, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 23: 189-194.
  • Beard JJ. 2001. A review of Australian Neoseiulus Hughes and Typhlodromips De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invertebrate Taxonomy 15: 73-158.
  • Berlese A. 1913. Acarotheca italica. Fasciculi I et II. Firenze: 1-19.
  • Berlese A. 1915. Acari nuovi. Manipulus IX. Redia 10: 113- 150.
  • Chant DA. 1957. Note on the status of some genera in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina). The Canadian Entomologist 89: 528-532.
  • Chant DA. 1959a. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in Southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Canadian Entomologist 91: 1-166.
  • Chant DA. 1959b. Observations sur la famille des Phytoseiidae. Acarologia 1: 11-22.
  • Chant DA. 1961. An experiment in biological control of Tetranychus telarius (L.)(Acarina: Tetranychidae) in a greenhouse using the predacious mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Entomologist 93: 437-443.
  • Chant DA. 1993. Discontinuous variation in the suppression of idiosomal setae in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Experimental and Applied Acarology 17: 187-195.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 20: 223-316.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2003a. A review of the subfamilies Amblyseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part II. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology 29: 3-46.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2003b. A review of the subfamilies Amblyseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part II. The tribe Kampimodromini. International Journal of Acarology 29: 179-224.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2004a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina N. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology 30: 171-228.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2004b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part IV. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology 30: 291- 312.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part V. Tribe Amblyseiini, subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology 31: 3-22.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VI. The tribe Euseiini N. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina, N. subtribe, Euseiina N. subtribe and Ricoseiina N. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology 31: 187-224.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005c. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VII. Typhlodromipsini n. tribe. International Journal of Acarology 31: 315-340.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2006a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VIII. The tribes Macroseiini Chant, Denmark and Baker, Phytoseiulini n. tribe, Africoseiulini n. tribe and Indoseiulini Ehara and Amano. International Journal of Acarology 32: 13-25.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2006b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part IX. An overview. International Journal of Acarology 32: 125-152.
  • Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). West Bloomfield, MI: Indira Publishing House, 220.
  • Chant DA, Yoshida-Shaul E. 1989. Adult dorsal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology 15: 219-233.
  • Chant DA, Yoshida-Shaul E. 1991. Adult ventral setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology 17: 187-199.
  • De Leon D. 1962. Twenty-three new phytoseiids, mostly from southeastern United States (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Entomologist 45: 11-27.
  • De Moraes GJ, Mcmurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434: 1-494.
  • Dosse G. 1957. Morphologie und Biologie von Typhlodromus zwolferi n.sp. (Acar., Phytoseiidae). Zeitschift fur angewante Entomologie 41: 301-311.
  • Dosse G. 1958. Die Spermathecae, ein zusatzliches Bestimmingsmerkmal bei Raubmilben (Acar., Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutz-Berichte 20: 1-11.
  • Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Cheung M, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Thierer T, Wilson A. 2007. Geneious v3.5. Available at: http://www.geneious.com/
  • Farris JS. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
  • Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
  • Garman P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 520: 5-27.
  • Hansell RIC. 1970. New methods for comparative systematic studies of phytoseiid mites. University of California, Riverside, Ph.D. Thesis: 1-97.
  • Hansell RIC, Chant DA. 1971. An analysis of the classical taxonomic method with particular reference to the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina:Mesostigmata). Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Acarology: 283-286.
  • Hirschmann W. 1957. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 1. Rumpfberhaarung und Ruckenflachen. Acarologie Schriftenreihe fur Vergleichende Milbenkunde, Hirschmann, Furth/Bay, 1-20 + 26 plates.
  • Hirschmann W. 1962. Gangystematik der Parasitiformes. Acarologie Schriftenreihe fur Vergleichende Milbenkunde, Hirschmann-Verlag, Furth/Bay, 5(5-6), 80 pp.+ 32 plates.
  • Jeyaprakash A, Hoy M. 2002. Mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences used to design a molecular ladder assay to identify six commercially available phytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 25: 136-142.
  • Jordal BH, Hewitt GM. 2004. The origin and radiation of macaronesian beetles breeding in Euphorbia: the relative importance of multiple data partitions and population sampling. Systematic Biology 53: 711-734.
  • Kanouh M, Tixier MS, Okassa M, Kreiter S. 2010. Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the genus Phytoseiulus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zoologica Scripta 39: 450-461.
  • Knox EB. 1998. The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 1-49.
  • Lindquist E, Evans GW. 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memorium of the Entomological Society of Canada 47: 1-64.
  • McMurtry JA. 1982. The use of phytoseiids for biological control: progress and future prospects. In: Hoy MA, ed. Recent advances in knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. Berkeley: University of California, Publication 3284: 23-48.
  • McMurtry JA, Croft BA. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 291-321.
  • McMurtry JA, Morse JG, Johnson HG. 1992. Studies of the impact of Euseius species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on citrus mites using predator exclusion and predator release experiments. Experimental and Applied Acarology 15: 233-248.
  • Mickevich MF, Farris FJ. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30: 351-369.
  • Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434: 1-494.
  • Muma MH. 1961. Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bulletin of Florida State Museum 5: 267-302.
  • Muma MH, Denmark HA. 1968. Some generic descriptions and name changes in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina:Mesostigmata). Florida Entomologist 51: 229-240.
  • Navajas M, Lagnel J, Fauvel G, Moraes GJ. 1999. Sequence variation of Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) in commercially important Phytoseiidae mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology 23: 851-859.
  • Nesbitt HHJ. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zoologische Verhandelingen 12: 1-64.
  • Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves- Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47-67.
  • Oatman ER, McMurtry JA. 1966. Biological control of the two-spotted spider mite on strawberry in southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology 59: 433-439.
  • Oudemans AC. 1928. Acarologische Aanteekeningen LXXXIX. Entomologische Berichten 159: 285.
  • Oudemans AC. 1930a. Acarologisches Aanteekeningen CI. Entomologische Berichten 171: 48-53.
  • Oudemans AC. 1930b. Acarologisches Aanteekeningen CII. Entomologische Berichten 172: 63-74.
  • Parrott PJ, Hodgkiss HE, Schoene WJ. 1906. The apple and pear mites. New York Agricultural Experimental Station of Geneve Bulletin 283: 281-318.
  • Pickett KM, Randle CP. 2005. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological prior imply non-uniform clade priors. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 34: 203-211.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
  • Ragusa S. 2000. A new Cydnodromus (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae), from the desert of the northern Chile. Phytophaga 10: 3-10.
  • Ragusa S, Athias-Henriot C. 1983. Observations on the genus Neoseiulus Hughes (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Redefinition. Composition. Geography. Description of two new species. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 90: 657-678.
  • Ragusa Di Chiara S, Tsolakis H. 1994. Revision of the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt 1951 (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae), with a description of a new species. Acarologia 35: 305-322.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 19: 1572-1574.
  • Rowell HJ, Chant DA, Hansell RIC. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Canadian Entomologist 110: 859-876.
  • Schuster RO, Smith LM. 1960. The spermathecae as taxonomic features in phytoseiid mites of western North America (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proceedings of Entomological Society of Washington 62: 181-188.
  • Sellnick M. 1944. Zercon C.L. KOCH. - Acari (Lotzen) Nr. 5: 30-41.
  • Simmons MP, Pickett KM, Miya M. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 188-199.
  • Smith LM, Summers FM. 1949. The structure and biology of the red spider predator, 'Hypoaspis ' macropilis (Banks). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 51: 209-218.
  • Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 16138-16143.
  • Swirski E, Amitai S, Dorzia N. 1970. Laboratory studies on the feeding habits, post-embryonic survival and oviposition of the predaceous mites Amblyseius chilenensis Dosse and Amblyseius hibisci Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Entomophaga 15: 93-106.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Ver. 4.0b.10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Takahashi F, Chant DA. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Phytoseiulus Evans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). II. Taxonomic review. International Journal of Acarology 19: 23-36.
  • Templeton AR. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
  • Tixier M-S, Okassa M, Liguori ML, Poinso A, Salerno B, Kreiter S. 2010. Voucher specimens for DNA sequences of Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). Acarologia 22: 487- 494.
  • Tuttle DM, Muma MH. 1973. Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) inhabiting agricultural and other plants in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 208: 1-55.
  • Wainstein BA. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et sistematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese,1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia 4: 5-30.
  • Wiens JJ. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Systematic Biology 47: 625-640.