Journal article Open Access

Discussion on Existing Standards and Quality Criteria in Nanosafety Research - Summary of the NanoS-QM Expert Workshop

Binder, Kunigunde; Bonatto Minella, Christian; Elberskirch, Linda; Kraegeloh, Annette; Liebing, Julia; Petzold, Christiane; Razum, Matthias; Riefler, Norbert; Schins, Roel; Sofranko, Adriana; van Thriel, Christoph; Unfried, Klaus

The partners of the research project NanoS-QM (Quality- and Description Standards for Nanosafety Research Data) identified and invited relevant experts from research institutions, federal agencies, and industry to evaluate the traceability of the results generated with the existing standards and quality criteria. During the discussion it emerged that numerous studies seem to be of insufficient quality for regulatory purposes or exhibit weaknesses with regard to data completeness. Deficiencies in study design could be avoided by more comprehensive use of appropriate standards, many of which already exist. The use of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) that allow for early collection of metadata and enrichment of datasets could be one solution to enable data re-use and simplify quality control. Generally, earlier provision and curation of data and metadata indicating their quality and completeness (e.g. guidelines, standards, standard operating procedures (SOPs) that were used) would improve their findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) in the nanosafety research field.

Files (580.5 kB)
Name Size
524.8 kB Download
55.6 kB Download
All versions This version
Views 371371
Downloads 302302
Data volume 145.4 MB145.4 MB
Unique views 330330
Unique downloads 260260


Cite as