Journal article Open Access

Discussion on Existing Standards and Quality Criteria in Nanosafety Research - Summary of the NanoS-QM Expert Workshop

Binder, Kunigunde; Bonatto Minella, Christian; Elberskirch, Linda; Kraegeloh, Annette; Liebing, Julia; Petzold, Christiane; Razum, Matthias; Riefler, Norbert; Schins, Roel; Sofranko, Adriana; van Thriel, Christoph; Unfried, Klaus

The partners of the research project NanoS-QM (Quality- and Description Standards for Nanosafety Research Data) identified and invited relevant experts from research institutions, federal agencies, and industry to evaluate the traceability of the results generated with the existing standards and quality criteria. During the discussion it emerged that numerous studies seem to be of insufficient quality for regulatory purposes or exhibit weaknesses with regard to data completeness. Deficiencies in study design could be avoided by more comprehensive use of appropriate standards, many of which already exist. The use of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) that allow for early collection of metadata and enrichment of datasets could be one solution to enable data re-use and simplify quality control. Generally, earlier provision and curation of data and metadata indicating their quality and completeness (e.g. guidelines, standards, standard operating procedures (SOPs) that were used) would improve their findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) in the nanosafety research field.

Files (580.5 kB)
Name Size
2020-06-17_ExpertWorkshop_NanoS-QM_QualityCriteria.pdf
md5:fecc8b4b84922c07e8dfe451a0ad4617
524.8 kB Download
Supplement_MindMap-QualityCriteria.pdf
md5:8c290cba53df59d120057298402ab253
55.6 kB Download
300
246
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 300300
Downloads 246246
Data volume 120.7 MB120.7 MB
Unique views 268268
Unique downloads 209209

Share

Cite as