Published December 1, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

International Journal of INTI

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Universiti Teknologi MARA

Description

Abstract

This study compared three design ideas development approaches implemented in fashion design course through students’ artworks and responses. It was observed that various design approaches were implemented within the same course and discipline, has resulting inconsistent outcomes in students’ artworks. Creativity may be stimulated in various approaches, nonetheless, the outcome of this study will further justify the ideal approach in fashion design ideas development process, depending on variable of requirements stated on design brief. Understanding the strengths of each approach will be beneficial to lecturers and students in enhancing design process and body of knowledge even further as a whole.

Files

Inti 1-merged.pdf

Files (142.1 MB)

Name Size
md5:e44d4fa91ec8d4fc40b5760b8b172e49
142.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Akin, Ö. (1994). Psychology of early design in architecture. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Engineering Design Research Center.
  • Aspelund, K. (2010). The design process. New York, NY: Fairchild Books.
  • Burke, S. (2011). Fashion Designer-Concept to Collection. United Kingdom: Burke Publishing.
  • Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.
  • Davis, M. L. (1996). Visual design in dress (3rd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.
  • Jones, S. J. (2011). Fashion Design. Great Britain: Laurence king Publishing Ltd.
  • Koberg, D., & Bagnall, J. (1981). The all new universal traveller: A soft-systems guide to creativity, problem-solving, & the process of reaching goals. Los Altos, CA: W. Kaufmann.
  • LaBat, K. L., & Sokolowski, S. L. (1999). A three-stage design process applied to an industry-university textile product design project. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(1), 11–20.
  • Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42–47.
  • Lee J. S. & Jirousek, C. (2015). The Development of Design Ideas in the Early Apparel Design Process: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Fashion Design, technology and Education. 8(2), 151-161.
  • Newell, A., & Simon, Herbert C. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Oxman, R. (2002). The thinking eye: Visual re-cognition in design emergence. Design Studies, 23(2), 135–164.
  • Petre, M., Sharp, H., & Johnson, J. (2006). Complexity through combination: An account of knitwear design. Design Studies, 27(2), 183–222.
  • Pipes, A. (2003). Foundations of art and design. London: Laurence King.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Seivewright, S. (2012). Basic Fashion Design 01: Research and Design. United Kingdom: AVA Publishing.
  • Shahriman, R. I. S. S. R., & Shaari, N. (2016). A Formative Conceptual Framework on Models of Teaching Strategies in Fashion Design Course. Proceedings from 2nd International Conference on Creative Media, Design & Technology (REKA2016). pp. 152-162 Penang, Malaysia. ISBN 978-967-13104-1-0
  • Watkins, S. M. (1988). Using the design process to teach functional apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(1), 10–14.
  • Wong, W. (1972). Principles of two-dimensional design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.