Proceedings of the International Naval Engineering Conference & Exhibition (INEC)
Published October 5, 2020 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Experimental study on a retrofitted marine size spark-ignition engine running on portinjected 100% methanol

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Delft University of Technology, NL
  • 2. Netherlands Defence Academy, NL
  • 3. Pon Power Papendrecht, NL
  • 4. TNO Powertrains, NL

Description

The maritime sector is currently facing a serious challenge of reducing emissions to meet the strict international and national emission regulations. In response to this challenge, the industry is initiating several research initiatives focused towards employment of alternative fuels in marine internal combustion engines. One of the promising alternatives is methanol. Methanol has multiple advantages such as higher volumetric energy density (including storage) compared to alternative fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia. Methanol is available at a relatively larger scale than hydrogen. Furthermore, compared to liquefied fuel storage of alternative fuels, methanol can be easily stored as a liquid onboard ships because of its liquid aggregation state at atmospheric conditions. Other advantages such as low flash point compared to LNG, fast biodegradation capabilities, and high water miscibility make it a high potential marine fuel with good safety considerations. Recognizing these benefits of methanol, the Green Maritime Methanol (GMM) project aims to investigate the uptake of methanol as an alternative shipping fuel for maritime vessels. GMM is a Dutch collaborative project among the entire sector. Research on application of methanol in marine engines is in its infancy stages and there is a knowledge gap pertaining to validated effects of methanol combustion in marine engines. This paper focusses on experimental investigations of methanol combustion in a marine spark ignited engine. To study the impact of combusting methanol, experiments were performed on a CAT G3508A natural gas (NG) engine, which is a turbocharged, spark-ignited (SI) engine with 8 cylinders and a rated power of 500 kWe at 1500 rpm. The engine was retrofitted and controlled to allow port-fuel injection (PFI) of methanol. Tests with stable engine operation were achieved with 100% methanol at 25%, 50% and 75% engine loading and constant engine speed of 1500 rpm. Engine performance on 100% methanol was also studied for varying ignition timings. In this paper, we discuss the retrofitting and safety considerations required for methanol combustion. We also present the experimental methodology employed to allow operation of the SI NG test engine on 100% methanol. The performance results of the engine operating on methanol are analyzed and compared against the results for natural gas. The engine performance for the two fuels is compared with respect to cyclic variations, in-cylinder combustion performance, engine efficiency. The results showed that engine efficiency improved by 2.2% and 0.9% at 50% and 75% load with methanol compared to natural gas for the same test conditions of ignition timing and NOx emissions. These preliminary methanol engine results show that improvements in engine efficiency can be obtained from a retrofitted SI NG engine converted to operate on 100% methanol without making any modifications to the geometrical engine specifications.

Files

INEC_2020_Paper_91.pdf

Files (2.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4a914714809c3cd7f5ddac8356605a0c
2.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • R. G. van de Ketterij, "Emissions reduction at the Netherlands ministry of defence: potential, possibilities and impact," Proc. Int. Nav. Eng. Conf. Exhib., vol. 14, no. October, 2018.
  • IEA 2009, "'Transport, Energy and CO2 – Moving toward sustainability,'" IEA / OECD report, 2009.
  • Maritime Knowledge Centre, TNO, and Delft University of Technology, "Final Report-Framework CO2 reduction in shipping," 2017.
  • H. Sapra et al., "SOFC-ICE Integration for maritime applications," To be Publ., pp. 1–50, 2020.
  • E. P. A. (EPA), "INTERIM ACUTE EXPOSURE GUIDELINE LEVELS ( AEGLs ) METHANOL," Www.Epa.Gov, no. 67, 2005.
  • E. P. A. (EPA), Acute exposure guideline leves for selected airborne chemicals: amonia, vol. 67, no. 6. 2007.
  • L. Bromberg and W. K. Cheng, "Methanol as an alternative transportation fuel in the US: Options for sustainable and/or energy-secure transportation," 2010.
  • M. Buitendijk, "Methanol as a marine fuel on the rise as Stena Germanica hits milestone - SWZ Maritime," 2020. .
  • Methanex, "Methanex monthly average regional posted contract price history," 2020.
  • P. Huyskens and Damen Shipyards, "LeanShips Low Energy And Near to zero emissions Ships," 2017.
  • J. Ellis et al., "Final Report-Summary of the SUMMETH Project Activities and Results," 2018.
  • S. Verhelst, J. W. Turner, L. Sileghem, and J. Vancoillie, "Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines," Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 70, pp. 43–88, 2019.
  • L. Sileghem, A. Ickes, T. Wallner, and S. Verhelst, "Experimental Investigation of a DISI Production Engine Fuelled with Methanol, Ethanol, Butanol and ISO-Stoichiometric Alcohol Blends," in SAE Technical Papers, 2015, vol. 2015-April, no. April.
  • J. Vancoillie, J. Demuynck, L. Sileghem, M. Van De Ginste, and S. Verhelst, "Comparison of the renewable transportation fuels, hydrogen and methanol formed from hydrogen, with gasoline - Engine efficiency study," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 9914–9924, Jun. 2012.
  • G. Merker, C. Schwarz, G. Stiesch, and F. Otto, Simulating Combustion: Simulation of combustion and pollutant formation for engine-development, no. 1. 2014.
  • A. Kumar, A. Anirudh, G. Nikhil, S. Akhilendra, and P. Singh, Methanol and the Alternate Fuel Economy Energy, Environment, and Sustainability Series Editors: Avinash Kumar Agarwal · Ashok Pandey. .
  • H. Sapra, M. Godjevac, P. De Vos, W. Van Sluijs, Y. Linden, and K. Visser, "Hydrogen-natural gas combustion in a marine lean-burn SI engine: A comparitive analysis of Seiliger and double Wiebe function-based zero–dimensional modelling," Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 207, no. January, p. 112494, 2020.
  • M. Institute, "Methanol Safe Handling Manual," no. October, 2008.
  • H. Sapra, Y. Linden, W. van Sluijs, M. Godjevac, and K. Visser, "Experimental investigations of performance variations in marine hydrogen-natural gas engines," in Cimac Congress 2019, 2019, pp. 1– 17.
  • F. Xie, X. Li, X. Wang, Y. Su, and W. Hong, "Research on using EGR and ignition timing to control load of a spark-ignition engine fueled with methanol," Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1084–1091, 2013.
  • F. Ma, Y. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Li, J. Wang, and S. Ding, "Effects of hydrogen addition on cycle-by-cycle variations in a lean burn natural gas spark-ignition engine," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 823–831, 2008.
  • J. B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Fundamentals, vol. 21. 2015.
  • D. E. Winterbone and A. Turan, "Combustion and Flames," Adv. Thermodyn. Eng., pp. 323–344, 2015.
  • M. Ghaderi Masouleh, K. Keskinen, O. Kaario, H. Kahila, S. Karimkashi, and V. Vuorinen, "Modeling cycle-to-cycle variations in spark ignited combustion engines by scale-resolving simulations for different engine speeds," Appl. Energy, vol. 250, pp. 801–820, Sep. 2019.
  • P. Power, "Caterpillar gas engine data ID: APERFAB30," vol. 1, no. August, 1993
  • J. P. Szybist, K. Chakravathy, and C. S. Daw, "Analysis of the impact of selected fuel thermochemical properties on internal combustion engine efficiency," Energy and Fuels, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2798–2810, 2012
  • H. Sapra, M. Godjevac, K. Visser, D. Stapersma, and C. Dijkstra, "Experimental and simulation-based investigations of marine diesel engine performance against static back pressure," Appl. Energy, vol. 204, pp. 78–92, 2017.
  • Y. Ding, D. Stapersma, T. Netherland, H. Knoll, and H. Grimmelius, "Characterising Heat Release in a Diesel Engine: A comparison between Seiliger Process and Vibe Model," CIMAC Congr. 2010, 2010.