Published February 1, 2021 | Version v0.2
Dataset Open

Continental Europe Digital Terrain Model geomorphometry derivatives at 30 m, 100 m and 250 m

  • 1. OpenGeoHub foundation

Description

Digital Terrain Model geomorphometry derivatives based on the DTM for Continental Europe using the EPSG:3035 projection system. Processed using SAGA GIS, GRASS 7 GIS and GDAL at 3 standard spatial resolutions: 30-m, 100-m and 250-m. Derivatives include:

  • devmean = deviation from mean value derived using SAGA GIS,
  • downlocal / down = downslope local and general curvature derived using SAGA GIS,
  • hillshade = hillshading derived using using GDAL gdaldem functions,
  • mnr = Module Melton Ruggedness Number derived using SAGA GIS,
  • northerness/easterness = derived using GRASS 7 GIS,
  • openp / openn = openness positive negative derived using SAGA GIS,
  • slope = slope in percent derived using GDAL gdaldem functions,
  • topidx = a topographic index (wetness index) derived using GRASS 7 GIS,
  • tpi = Topographic Wetness Index derived using SAGA GIS,
  • vbf = Multiresolution Index of Valley Bottom Flatness derived using SAGA GIS,

Detailed processing steps can be found here. Read more about the processing steps here.

Derivatives were chosen aiming to support soil and vegetation mapping projects. The slope.percent map at 30-m has been converted from 0-100% scale to 0-200% (Byte format) to help decrease the file size.

Notes

This work has received funding from the European Union's the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) under Grant Agreement Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Telecom project 2018-EU-IA-0095 (https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/2018-eu-ia-0095).

Files

001_dtm_derivatives_EU.png

Files (41.6 GB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2313e114d72a05bd04204197c795acda
1.8 MB Preview Download
md5:aec5568c9ce0849a808a83345ea35e3c
159.1 MB Preview Download
md5:75db9f79e9f662f8485a451a3ebcd9fb
1.2 GB Preview Download
md5:9bf0745d3cc93782bc101caf9da70141
196.3 MB Preview Download
md5:e41f81c8d1aeed6b37f543a6211571c3
1.2 GB Preview Download
md5:b2d42160e63c93f6bc24aa79beaf2db1
194.0 MB Preview Download
md5:2efe67cd7c57faf2fa2df34b78ff7dba
604.4 MB Preview Download
md5:b7a066defd5f1026a1c79d91f44ffccc
90.1 MB Preview Download
md5:dd03816c0faa626d77ceb01800c98683
643.1 MB Preview Download
md5:946244f14820344f4d89be410518b551
95.9 MB Preview Download
md5:4ebf47dd198ea1ecc3f26c171d31656a
2.4 GB Preview Download
md5:27b348f26cdef56e2bad2366905053e9
4.4 GB Preview Download
md5:88e43f9b5e908ff68f78eac3bbc274d4
5.5 GB Preview Download
md5:a788d50b83ecfd955147529b5b1615ae
73.2 MB Preview Download
md5:422c31f0403bc3f60e788c091360ccbb
2.4 GB Preview Download
md5:7b5cd87e515ae553492df01c5492b43c
434.9 MB Preview Download
md5:1c0ae56e8cfcc1bb3f75a69960c542a2
5.5 GB Preview Download
md5:132dc3a60175e316df1ed0b281465565
423.3 MB Preview Download
md5:cb22e21e2ff9fea1fba085aed2154278
5.4 GB Preview Download
md5:2414bf616c732d6254ec35fcde9ab559
5.2 GB Preview Download
md5:18b143380fcd70d4349e7582d5fbb576
62.1 MB Preview Download
md5:cde5c44bd1d752e835f6d48673a7f5df
2.0 GB Preview Download
md5:e290324942f5fce1166faa1082687794
764.9 MB Preview Download
md5:a48b2b02f44c8c8403ae5efbd9e0a091
133.3 MB Preview Download
md5:acc62aadda02d112f86ba0f4eda53229
664.5 MB Preview Download
md5:025bb3d1e5f24a15473581c34fcca431
101.8 MB Preview Download
md5:d23df5d38e0f92daf81ded1484f5e5a4
778.5 MB Preview Download
md5:a8329254daed39ad92c3f902501b4a41
131.4 MB Preview Download
md5:54be9d1bd4f2a8e740444246ee738833
720.5 MB Preview Download
md5:291a77c98ab733e210d607fca788de7b
135.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Dataset: 10.5281/zenodo.4056634 (DOI)

References

  • Amatulli, G., McInerney, D., Sethi, T., Strobl, P., & Domisch, S. (2020). Geomorpho90m, empirical evaluation and accuracy assessment of global high-resolution geomorphometric layers. Scientific Data, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0479-6
  • Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., ... & Böhner, J. (2015). System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1. 4. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(7), 1991-2007.
  • Dubayah, R., Blair, J. B., Goetz, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Hansen, M., Healey, S., ... & Silva, C. (2020). The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography. Science of remote sensing, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002
  • Grohmann, C. H. (2018). Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sensing of Environment, 212, 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
  • Neteler, M., & Mitasova, H. (2013). Open source GIS: a GRASS GIS approach (Vol. 689). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Uuemaa, E., Ahi, S., Montibeller, B., Muru, M., & Kmoch, A. (2020). Vertical Accuracy of Freely Available Global Digital Elevation Models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482
  • Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Sosa, J., Bates, P. D., Allen, G. H., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2019). MERIT Hydro: a high‐resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resources Research, 55(6), 5053-5073. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024873