PIK3CA alterations and benefit with neratinib: analysis from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III ExteNET trial
-
Chia Stephen K. L.1
- Miguel Martin2
- Holmes Frankie A.3
- Ejlertsen Bent4
- Delaloge Suzette5
- Moy Beverly6
- Iwata Hiroji7
- von Minckwitz Gunter8
- Mansi Janine9
- Barrios Carlos H10
- Gnant Michael11
- Tomašević Zorica12
- Denduluri Neelima13
- Šeparović Robert14
- Kim Sung-Bae15
- Jakobsen Erik Hugger16
- Harvey Vernon17
- Robert Nicholas18
- Smith II John19
- Harker Graydon20
- Zhang Bo21
- Eli Lisa D22
- Ye Yining22
- Lalani Alshad S22
- Buyse Marc23
- Chan Arlene24
- 1. 1British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, 600 West10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z4E6, Cana
- 2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
- 3. Texas Oncology, P.A, Houston, TX, USA.
- 4. Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 5. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
- 6. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- 7. Aichi Cancer Center, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
- 8. Luisenkrankenhaus, German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Düsseldorf, Neu-isenburg, Germany
- 9. Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
- 10. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- 11. Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- 12. Daily Chemotherapy Hospital, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- 13. Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA, USA.
- 14. University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
- 15. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
- 16. Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
- 17. Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
- 18. McKesson Specialty Health and The US Oncology Network, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
- 19. Compass Oncology, Portland, OR, USA. 20Utah Cancer Specialists, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- 20. Utah Cancer Specialists, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- 21. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 22. 21Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 23. International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- 24. Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth & Curtin University, Nedlands, Australia
Description
Background:Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits PI3K/Akt and MAPK signalingpathways after HER2 receptor activation. The ExteNET study showed that neratinib significantly improved 5-yearinvasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in women who completed trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy for early breastcancer (EBC). We assessed the prognostic and predictive significance ofPIK3CAalterations in patients in ExteNET.Methods:Participants were women aged≥18 years (≥20 years in Japan) with stage 1–3c (modified to stage 2–3cin February 2010) operable breast cancer, who had completed (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab≤2years before randomization, with no evidence of disease recurrence or metastatic disease at study entry. Patientswere randomized to oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 1 year. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primarytumor specimens underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR)PIK3CAtesting for two hotspot mutations in exon 9,one hot-spot mutation in exon 20, an fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis forPIK3CAamplification.The primary endpoint (iDFS) was tested with log-rank test and hazard ratios (HRs) estimated using Coxproportional-hazards models.Results:Among the intent-to-treat population (n= 2840), tumor specimens were available for PCR testing (991patients) andPIK3CAFISH (702 patients). Overall, 262 samples werePIK3CAaltered: 201 were mutated (77%), 52(20%) were amplified, and 9 (3%) were mutated and amplified. iDFS was non-significantly worse in placebo-treatedpatients with altered vs wild-typePIK3CA(HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.72–2.50;P= 0.357). Neratinib’s effect over placebo wassignificant in patients withPIK3CA-altered tumors (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.17–0.90,P= 0.028) but notPIK3CAwild-typetumors (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.36–1.41;P= 0.34). The interaction test was non-significant (P=0.309). Conclusions: Although there was a greater absolute risk reduction associated with neratinib treatment of patients with PIK3CA-altered tumors in ExteNET, current data do not supportPIK3CAalteration as a predictive biomarker ofresponse to neratinib in HER2-positive EBC.
Notes
Files
Chia-2019-Pikca-alterations-and-benefit-with--1.pdf
Files
(930.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:53302d5108eb1e622957748e002de0e8
|
930.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplemented by
- https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13058-019-1115-2 (URL)