Published October 5, 2020 | Version v1

A CASE STUDY INTO AN AUTOMATED DETAILED LAYOUT GENERATION APPROACH IN EARLY STAGE NAVAL SHIP DESIGN

  • 1. Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands
  • 2. Defence Materiel Organisation, the Netherlands

Description

The Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO) of the Netherlands Ministry of Defence identified that detailing warship layouts to space level of detail during the concept definition design phase is a complex and time consuming process. Currently it can take up to 150 man hours to complete a feasible general arrangement plan (GAP). Yet, these GAPs are crucial for balancing requirements and budget with technical feasible designs. Insufficient consideration of spatial details during concept definition increases the probability that sizing and integration issues will emerge later in the design process. This paper discusses the first steps undertaken to integrate a new layout generation tool, called WARGEAR (WARship GEneral ARrangement), into the DMO ship design process. WARGEAR is able to semi-automatically generate feasible and balanced detailed layouts in a matter of minutes, thus providing almost real-time feedback and design insight to naval architects. In this paper the issues of tool validation and user acceptance are addressed via a realistic warship design test case and a presentation of the test case results to a larger group of naval architects and senior management at the DMO respectively. The test case showed that WARGEAR is able to generate detailed layouts that compare well to GAPs manually generated by naval architects. The attendees at the presentation were generally positive, but also provided valuable feedback for further development of the WARGEAR tool and methodology. This shows the potential of WARGEAR to increase the speed of detailed layout generation to a matter of minutes and to improve the early stage design process by providing early insight into detailed layouts and their design drivers.

Files

INEC_2020_Paper_15.pdf

Files (1.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:060446c47ba39af2a1fbef736b7dfc51
1.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Andrews, D.J., 2011. Marine requirements elucidation and the nature of preliminary ship design. The International Journal of Maritime Engineering 153(1), A23–A39. doi:10.3940/rina.ijme.2011.a1.202
  • Andrews, D.J., 2012. Art and science in the design of physically large and complex systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 468, 891–912. doi:10.1098/rspa. 2011.0590.
  • Andrews, D.J., Dicks, C.A., 1997. The building block design methodology applied to advanced naval ship design, in: Proceedings of the International Marine Design Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom, pp. 3–19.
  • Van der Bles, R., 2019. A Design Tool for Machinery Space Arrangement. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology.
  • Carlson, C.M., Fireman, H., 1987. General arrangement design computer system and methodology. Naval Engineers Journal 99, 261–273.
  • DeNucci, T.W., 2012. Capturing Design: Improving conceptual ship design through the capture of design rationale. Ph.D. thesis. Delft University of Technology.
  • Le Poole, J.J., Duchateau, E.A.E., Van Oers, B.J., Hopman, J.J., Kana, A.A., 2019. Semi-automated approach for detailed layout generation during early stage surface warship design, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding, Issue 3, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 37–48.
  • Marson, F., Musse, S.R., 2010. Automatic real-time generation of floor plans based on squarified treemaps algorithm. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2010, 1–10.
  • Pedersen, K., Emblemsvag, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J.K., Mistree, F., 2000. Validating design methods and research: the validation square, in: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, pp. 1–12.
  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S., 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems 24, pp. 45–77.
  • Rigterink, D.T., 2014. Methods for Analyzing Early Stage Naval Distributed Systems Designs, Employing Simplex, Multislice, and Multiplex Networks. Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan.
  • Shields, C.P.F., Knight, J.T., Singer, D.J., 2016. The design process as a complex system, in: ASNE Day. Takken, E.H., 2009. Concept Design by using Functional Volume Blocks with variable Resolution. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology.
  • Van Oers, B., Takken, E., Duchateau, E., Zandstra, R., Cieraad, S., van den Broek-de Bruijn, W., Janssen, M., 2018. Warship Concept Exploration and Definition at The Netherlands Defence Materiel Organisation. Naval Engineers Journal 130, 63–84.
  • Van Oers, B.J., 2011. A Packing Approach for the Early Stage Design of Service Vessels. Ph.D. thesis. Delft University of Technology.
  • Van der Weg, H., 2020. Traceability in ship design: Connecting need, requirements and design in one information model. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology.