Published September 29, 2020 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Modeling of ecological-economic effect socio-economic projects implementations

Description

Approaches to modeling the socio-ecological-economic effect based on the example of the sphere of health-improving nature management are considered, which is considered from three positions: as a phenomenon, process and type of activity and in which there is no clear causal link between measures, ecological state and results . Socio-ecological and economic efficiency is considered as a relative change in the entropy of the system "nature-humanity" due to the implementation of the project under the influence of three groups of factors: the number of incurable; the level of contamination of the territory; technogenic load on the ecosystem. This approach can be considered universal and used in all spheres and not only nature management but in general where there is no clear set of predictor variables and their values are unknown.

Files

30.pdf

Files (875.9 kB)

Name Size
md5:00f6c164d4c293a76d31311cbc10f6a5
875.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Hachaturov T.S. (1979). Effektivnost kapitalnyh vlogeniy [Capital investment efficiency] / Moscow. Ekonomika, 335 p. [in Russian].
  • 2. Hachaturov T.S. (1987). Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya [Environmental economics] /executive editor E.I. Kapustin; USSR Academy of Sciences, Department of Economics, 2nd ed. M. Science [in Russian].
  • 3. Gabor S.S., Gabor V.S. (2012). Efektyvnist yak ekonomichna kategoriya [Efficiency as an economic categor], Innovative economy, 7. 14-17. [in Ukrainian].
  • 4. Strelec E.М (2013) Efektyvnist yak ekonomichna kategoriya [Efficiency as an economic categor], Zaporizhzhya: KPU, P. 9. [in Ukrainian].
  • 5. Pavlov S.B (2001). Ekologichnyy ryzyk dlya zdorovya naselennya. [Environmental risk to public health] Medical research, Т. 1, 1, 16-19. [in Ukrainian].
  • 6. Sutonskaya I.V., Avhimenko M.M. (1993). O riske svyazanom s neblagopriyatnyim vozdeystviem faktorov okruzhayuschey sredyi i ee vospriyatie naselenim (zarubezhnyiy opyit). [On the risk associated with the adverse effects of environmental factors and its perception by the population (foreign experience)] / Hygiene and sanitation, 4, 60-62. [in Russian].
  • 7. Bondarchuk Е. (1999). Protsedura opovescheniya o riske pri adaptatsii metodologii otsenki riska zdorovyu naseleniya ot zagryazneniya okruzhayuschey sredyi [The risk notification procedure when adapting the methodology for assessing the risk to public health from environmental pollution] Management of risks, 1, 45-56.
  • 8. Knyazevskaya N.V, Knyazevskiy V.S. (1998). Prinyatie riskovyih situatsiy v ekonomike i biznese [Acceptance of risk situations in the economy and business ], Moscow: Contur, 160 p [in Russian].
  • 9. Byikov A, Solenova L, Zemlyanaya G. (1999). Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo uscherba ot narusheniya zdorovya naseleniya, obuslovlenogo zagryazneniem atmosfernogo vozduha [Guidelines for assessing socio-economic damage from public health impairment due to air pollution] Management of risks, 3. 51-59.
  • 10. Pirozhkov S.I. (1996). KontseptsIya riziku ta ekologIchna bezpeka [Riziku and ecologic bezpeka concept] Environment and health, 1.12-15.
  • 11. Classification of hazard experts on the GHS: terrestrial tnvironmental hazards. (2008). Document ENV/JM/HCL (2008)3. – to the terrestrial environment. A review. Draft report to the UN sub-committee of Paris: OECD, 42 p.
  • 12. Dokument implementacyjny do strategii rozwoju transportu do 2020 r. (z perspektyw№ do 2030r.). (2013). Ministerstwo infrastruktury i rozwoju. Warszawa, grudzieс. Access mode: http://www.transport.gov.pl/files/0/ 1796320/ZacznikNr11ProjektDokumentuImplementacyjnego.pdf.